Cargando…

Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline?

Species in many ecosystems are facing declines of key resources. If we are to understand and predict the effects of resource loss on natural populations, we need to understand whether and how the way animals use resources changes under resource decline. We investigated how the abundance of arboreal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banks, Sam C., Lindenmayer, David B., Wood, Jeff T., McBurney, Lachlan, Blair, David, Blyton, Michaela D. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23320100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053672
_version_ 1782255179276484608
author Banks, Sam C.
Lindenmayer, David B.
Wood, Jeff T.
McBurney, Lachlan
Blair, David
Blyton, Michaela D. J.
author_facet Banks, Sam C.
Lindenmayer, David B.
Wood, Jeff T.
McBurney, Lachlan
Blair, David
Blyton, Michaela D. J.
author_sort Banks, Sam C.
collection PubMed
description Species in many ecosystems are facing declines of key resources. If we are to understand and predict the effects of resource loss on natural populations, we need to understand whether and how the way animals use resources changes under resource decline. We investigated how the abundance of arboreal marsupials varies in response to a critical resource, hollow-bearing trees. Principally, we asked what mechanisms mediate the relationship between resources and abundance? Do animals use a greater or smaller proportion of the remaining resource, and is there a change in cooperative resource use (den sharing), as the availability of hollow trees declines? Analyses of data from 160 sites surveyed from 1997 to 2007 showed that hollow tree availability was positively associated with abundance of the mountain brushtail possum, the agile antechinus and the greater glider. The abundance of Leadbeater’s possum was primarily influenced by forest age. Notably, the relationship between abundance and hollow tree availability was significantly less than 1∶1 for all species. This was due primarily to a significant increase by all species in the proportional use of hollow-bearing trees where the abundance of this resource was low. The resource-sharing response was weaker and inconsistent among species. Two species, the mountain brushtail possum and the agile antechinus, showed significant but contrasting relationships between the number of animals per occupied tree and hollow tree abundance. The discrepancies between the species can be explained partly by differences in several aspects of the species’ biology, including body size, types of hollows used and social behaviour as it relates to hollow use. Our results show that individual and social aspects of resource use are not always static in response to resource availability and support the need to account for dynamic resource use patterns in predictive models of animal distribution and abundance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3539978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35399782013-01-14 Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline? Banks, Sam C. Lindenmayer, David B. Wood, Jeff T. McBurney, Lachlan Blair, David Blyton, Michaela D. J. PLoS One Research Article Species in many ecosystems are facing declines of key resources. If we are to understand and predict the effects of resource loss on natural populations, we need to understand whether and how the way animals use resources changes under resource decline. We investigated how the abundance of arboreal marsupials varies in response to a critical resource, hollow-bearing trees. Principally, we asked what mechanisms mediate the relationship between resources and abundance? Do animals use a greater or smaller proportion of the remaining resource, and is there a change in cooperative resource use (den sharing), as the availability of hollow trees declines? Analyses of data from 160 sites surveyed from 1997 to 2007 showed that hollow tree availability was positively associated with abundance of the mountain brushtail possum, the agile antechinus and the greater glider. The abundance of Leadbeater’s possum was primarily influenced by forest age. Notably, the relationship between abundance and hollow tree availability was significantly less than 1∶1 for all species. This was due primarily to a significant increase by all species in the proportional use of hollow-bearing trees where the abundance of this resource was low. The resource-sharing response was weaker and inconsistent among species. Two species, the mountain brushtail possum and the agile antechinus, showed significant but contrasting relationships between the number of animals per occupied tree and hollow tree abundance. The discrepancies between the species can be explained partly by differences in several aspects of the species’ biology, including body size, types of hollows used and social behaviour as it relates to hollow use. Our results show that individual and social aspects of resource use are not always static in response to resource availability and support the need to account for dynamic resource use patterns in predictive models of animal distribution and abundance. Public Library of Science 2013-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3539978/ /pubmed/23320100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053672 Text en © 2013 Banks et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Banks, Sam C.
Lindenmayer, David B.
Wood, Jeff T.
McBurney, Lachlan
Blair, David
Blyton, Michaela D. J.
Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline?
title Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline?
title_full Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline?
title_fullStr Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline?
title_full_unstemmed Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline?
title_short Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline?
title_sort can individual and social patterns of resource use buffer animal populations against resource decline?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23320100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053672
work_keys_str_mv AT bankssamc canindividualandsocialpatternsofresourceusebufferanimalpopulationsagainstresourcedecline
AT lindenmayerdavidb canindividualandsocialpatternsofresourceusebufferanimalpopulationsagainstresourcedecline
AT woodjefft canindividualandsocialpatternsofresourceusebufferanimalpopulationsagainstresourcedecline
AT mcburneylachlan canindividualandsocialpatternsofresourceusebufferanimalpopulationsagainstresourcedecline
AT blairdavid canindividualandsocialpatternsofresourceusebufferanimalpopulationsagainstresourcedecline
AT blytonmichaeladj canindividualandsocialpatternsofresourceusebufferanimalpopulationsagainstresourcedecline