Cargando…

Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND: Low risk prostate cancers are commonly treated with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy involving I-125 seeds. The implementation of a ‘live-planning’ technique at the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) in 2007 enabled the completion of the whole procedure (i.e. scanning, planning and implant)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moorrees, Joshua, Lawson, John M, Marcu, Loredana G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3540010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23173620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-196
_version_ 1782255186904875008
author Moorrees, Joshua
Lawson, John M
Marcu, Loredana G
author_facet Moorrees, Joshua
Lawson, John M
Marcu, Loredana G
author_sort Moorrees, Joshua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low risk prostate cancers are commonly treated with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy involving I-125 seeds. The implementation of a ‘live-planning’ technique at the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) in 2007 enabled the completion of the whole procedure (i.e. scanning, planning and implant) in one sitting. ‘Live-planning’ has the advantage of a more reliable delivery of the planned treatment compared to the ‘traditional pre-plan’ technique (where patient is scanned and planned in the weeks prior to implant). During live planning, the actual implanted needle positions are updated real-time on the treatment planning system and the dosimetry is automatically recalculated. The aim of this investigation was to assess the differences and clinical relevance between the planned dosimetry and the updated real-time implant dosimetry. METHODS: A number of 162 patients were included in this dosimetric study. A paired t-test was performed on the D90, V100, V150 and V200 target parameters and the differences between the planned and implanted dose distributions were analysed. Similarly, dosimetric differences for the organs at risk (OAR) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Small differences between the primary dosimetric parameters for the target were found. Still, the incidence of hotspots was increased with approximately 20% for V200. Statistically significant increases were observed in the doses delivered to the OAR between the planned and implanted data; however, these increases were consistently below 3% thus probably without clinical consequences. CONCLUSIONS: The current study assessed the accuracy of prostate implants with I-125 seeds when compared to initial plans. The results confirmed the precision of the implant technique which RAH has in place. Nevertheless, geographical misses, anatomical restrictions and needle displacements during implant can have repercussions for centres without live-planning option if dosimetric changes are not taken into consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3540010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35400102013-01-10 Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy Moorrees, Joshua Lawson, John M Marcu, Loredana G Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Low risk prostate cancers are commonly treated with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy involving I-125 seeds. The implementation of a ‘live-planning’ technique at the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) in 2007 enabled the completion of the whole procedure (i.e. scanning, planning and implant) in one sitting. ‘Live-planning’ has the advantage of a more reliable delivery of the planned treatment compared to the ‘traditional pre-plan’ technique (where patient is scanned and planned in the weeks prior to implant). During live planning, the actual implanted needle positions are updated real-time on the treatment planning system and the dosimetry is automatically recalculated. The aim of this investigation was to assess the differences and clinical relevance between the planned dosimetry and the updated real-time implant dosimetry. METHODS: A number of 162 patients were included in this dosimetric study. A paired t-test was performed on the D90, V100, V150 and V200 target parameters and the differences between the planned and implanted dose distributions were analysed. Similarly, dosimetric differences for the organs at risk (OAR) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Small differences between the primary dosimetric parameters for the target were found. Still, the incidence of hotspots was increased with approximately 20% for V200. Statistically significant increases were observed in the doses delivered to the OAR between the planned and implanted data; however, these increases were consistently below 3% thus probably without clinical consequences. CONCLUSIONS: The current study assessed the accuracy of prostate implants with I-125 seeds when compared to initial plans. The results confirmed the precision of the implant technique which RAH has in place. Nevertheless, geographical misses, anatomical restrictions and needle displacements during implant can have repercussions for centres without live-planning option if dosimetric changes are not taken into consideration. BioMed Central 2012-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3540010/ /pubmed/23173620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-196 Text en Copyright ©2012 Moorrees et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Moorrees, Joshua
Lawson, John M
Marcu, Loredana G
Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy
title Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy
title_full Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy
title_fullStr Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy
title_short Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy
title_sort assessment of i-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3540010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23173620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-196
work_keys_str_mv AT moorreesjoshua assessmentofi125seedimplantaccuracywhenusingtheliveplanningtechniqueforlowdoserateprostatebrachytherapy
AT lawsonjohnm assessmentofi125seedimplantaccuracywhenusingtheliveplanningtechniqueforlowdoserateprostatebrachytherapy
AT marculoredanag assessmentofi125seedimplantaccuracywhenusingtheliveplanningtechniqueforlowdoserateprostatebrachytherapy