Cargando…

Urgent surgical management for embolized occluder devices in childhood: single center experience

BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to analyze our experience in urgent surgical management for embolized cardiac septal and ductal occluder devices resulting from trans-catheter closure of atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect and patent ductus arteriosus in childhood patient group. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gokaslan, Gokhan, Ustunsoy, Hasim, Deniz, Hayati, Ozcaliskan, Ozerdem, Yasim, Alptekin, Baspinar, Osman, Guzel, Gokalp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3540020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23217122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-7-127
_version_ 1782255189306114048
author Gokaslan, Gokhan
Ustunsoy, Hasim
Deniz, Hayati
Ozcaliskan, Ozerdem
Yasim, Alptekin
Baspinar, Osman
Guzel, Gokalp
author_facet Gokaslan, Gokhan
Ustunsoy, Hasim
Deniz, Hayati
Ozcaliskan, Ozerdem
Yasim, Alptekin
Baspinar, Osman
Guzel, Gokalp
author_sort Gokaslan, Gokhan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to analyze our experience in urgent surgical management for embolized cardiac septal and ductal occluder devices resulting from trans-catheter closure of atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect and patent ductus arteriosus in childhood patient group. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 9 patients (aged 2–15 years) who underwent urgent surgery due to cardiac septal and ductal occluder embolization between January 2007 and December 2010. Congenital defects were atrial septal defect (n = 6), ventricular septal defect (n = 1), and patent ductus arteriosus (n = 2). Risk factors for device embolization and urgent surgical management techniques for embolized device removal were discussed. RESULTS: Removal of embolized devices in all cases and repair of damaged tricuspid valve in 2 patients were performed. Inevitably, all congenital defects were closed or ligated up to the primary defect. Total circulator arrest necessitated in 1 patient with ascending aortic device embolization. All operations were completed successfully and no hospital mortality or morbidity was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Although closure of left to right shunting defects by percutaneous occluder devices has a lot of advantages, device embolization is still a major complication. If embolized device retrieval fails with percutaneous intervention attempts, surgical management is the only method to remove embolized devices. In this circumstance, to provide an uneventful perioperative course, urgent management strategies should be well planned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3540020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35400202013-01-10 Urgent surgical management for embolized occluder devices in childhood: single center experience Gokaslan, Gokhan Ustunsoy, Hasim Deniz, Hayati Ozcaliskan, Ozerdem Yasim, Alptekin Baspinar, Osman Guzel, Gokalp J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to analyze our experience in urgent surgical management for embolized cardiac septal and ductal occluder devices resulting from trans-catheter closure of atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect and patent ductus arteriosus in childhood patient group. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 9 patients (aged 2–15 years) who underwent urgent surgery due to cardiac septal and ductal occluder embolization between January 2007 and December 2010. Congenital defects were atrial septal defect (n = 6), ventricular septal defect (n = 1), and patent ductus arteriosus (n = 2). Risk factors for device embolization and urgent surgical management techniques for embolized device removal were discussed. RESULTS: Removal of embolized devices in all cases and repair of damaged tricuspid valve in 2 patients were performed. Inevitably, all congenital defects were closed or ligated up to the primary defect. Total circulator arrest necessitated in 1 patient with ascending aortic device embolization. All operations were completed successfully and no hospital mortality or morbidity was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Although closure of left to right shunting defects by percutaneous occluder devices has a lot of advantages, device embolization is still a major complication. If embolized device retrieval fails with percutaneous intervention attempts, surgical management is the only method to remove embolized devices. In this circumstance, to provide an uneventful perioperative course, urgent management strategies should be well planned. BioMed Central 2012-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3540020/ /pubmed/23217122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-7-127 Text en Copyright ©2012 Gokaslan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gokaslan, Gokhan
Ustunsoy, Hasim
Deniz, Hayati
Ozcaliskan, Ozerdem
Yasim, Alptekin
Baspinar, Osman
Guzel, Gokalp
Urgent surgical management for embolized occluder devices in childhood: single center experience
title Urgent surgical management for embolized occluder devices in childhood: single center experience
title_full Urgent surgical management for embolized occluder devices in childhood: single center experience
title_fullStr Urgent surgical management for embolized occluder devices in childhood: single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Urgent surgical management for embolized occluder devices in childhood: single center experience
title_short Urgent surgical management for embolized occluder devices in childhood: single center experience
title_sort urgent surgical management for embolized occluder devices in childhood: single center experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3540020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23217122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-7-127
work_keys_str_mv AT gokaslangokhan urgentsurgicalmanagementforembolizedoccluderdevicesinchildhoodsinglecenterexperience
AT ustunsoyhasim urgentsurgicalmanagementforembolizedoccluderdevicesinchildhoodsinglecenterexperience
AT denizhayati urgentsurgicalmanagementforembolizedoccluderdevicesinchildhoodsinglecenterexperience
AT ozcaliskanozerdem urgentsurgicalmanagementforembolizedoccluderdevicesinchildhoodsinglecenterexperience
AT yasimalptekin urgentsurgicalmanagementforembolizedoccluderdevicesinchildhoodsinglecenterexperience
AT baspinarosman urgentsurgicalmanagementforembolizedoccluderdevicesinchildhoodsinglecenterexperience
AT guzelgokalp urgentsurgicalmanagementforembolizedoccluderdevicesinchildhoodsinglecenterexperience