Cargando…

Reaction wood – a key cause of variation in cell wall recalcitrance in willow

BACKGROUND: The recalcitrance of lignocellulosic cell wall biomass to deconstruction varies greatly in angiosperms, yet the source of this variation remains unclear. Here, in eight genotypes of short rotation coppice willow (Salix sp.) variability of the reaction wood (RW) response and the impact of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brereton, Nicholas JB, Ray, Michael J, Shield, Ian, Martin, Peter, Karp, Angela, Murphy, Richard J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23173900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-83
_version_ 1782255306248552448
author Brereton, Nicholas JB
Ray, Michael J
Shield, Ian
Martin, Peter
Karp, Angela
Murphy, Richard J
author_facet Brereton, Nicholas JB
Ray, Michael J
Shield, Ian
Martin, Peter
Karp, Angela
Murphy, Richard J
author_sort Brereton, Nicholas JB
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recalcitrance of lignocellulosic cell wall biomass to deconstruction varies greatly in angiosperms, yet the source of this variation remains unclear. Here, in eight genotypes of short rotation coppice willow (Salix sp.) variability of the reaction wood (RW) response and the impact of this variation on cell wall recalcitrance to enzymatic saccharification was considered. RESULTS: A pot trial was designed to test if the ‘RW response’ varies between willow genotypes and contributes to the differences observed in cell wall recalcitrance to enzymatic saccharification in field-grown trees. Biomass composition was measured via wet chemistry and used with glucose release yields from enzymatic saccharification to determine cell wall recalcitrance. The levels of glucose release found for pot-grown control trees showed no significant correlation with glucose release from mature field-grown trees. However, when a RW phenotype was induced in pot-grown trees, glucose release was strongly correlated with that for mature field-grown trees. Field studies revealed a 5-fold increase in glucose release from a genotype grown at a site exposed to high wind speeds (a potentially high RW inducing environment) when compared with the same genotype grown at a more sheltered site. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence for a new concept concerning variation in the recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis of the stem biomass of different, field-grown willow genotypes (and potentially other angiosperms). Specifically, that genotypic differences in the ability to produce a response to RW inducing conditions (a ‘RW response’) indicate that this RW response is a primary determinant of the variation observed in cell wall glucan accessibility. The identification of the importance of this RW response trait in willows, is likely to be valuable in selective breeding strategies in willow (and other angiosperm) biofuel crops and, with further work to dissect the nature of RW variation, could provide novel targets for genetic modification for improved biofuel feedstocks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3541151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35411512013-01-11 Reaction wood – a key cause of variation in cell wall recalcitrance in willow Brereton, Nicholas JB Ray, Michael J Shield, Ian Martin, Peter Karp, Angela Murphy, Richard J Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: The recalcitrance of lignocellulosic cell wall biomass to deconstruction varies greatly in angiosperms, yet the source of this variation remains unclear. Here, in eight genotypes of short rotation coppice willow (Salix sp.) variability of the reaction wood (RW) response and the impact of this variation on cell wall recalcitrance to enzymatic saccharification was considered. RESULTS: A pot trial was designed to test if the ‘RW response’ varies between willow genotypes and contributes to the differences observed in cell wall recalcitrance to enzymatic saccharification in field-grown trees. Biomass composition was measured via wet chemistry and used with glucose release yields from enzymatic saccharification to determine cell wall recalcitrance. The levels of glucose release found for pot-grown control trees showed no significant correlation with glucose release from mature field-grown trees. However, when a RW phenotype was induced in pot-grown trees, glucose release was strongly correlated with that for mature field-grown trees. Field studies revealed a 5-fold increase in glucose release from a genotype grown at a site exposed to high wind speeds (a potentially high RW inducing environment) when compared with the same genotype grown at a more sheltered site. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence for a new concept concerning variation in the recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis of the stem biomass of different, field-grown willow genotypes (and potentially other angiosperms). Specifically, that genotypic differences in the ability to produce a response to RW inducing conditions (a ‘RW response’) indicate that this RW response is a primary determinant of the variation observed in cell wall glucan accessibility. The identification of the importance of this RW response trait in willows, is likely to be valuable in selective breeding strategies in willow (and other angiosperm) biofuel crops and, with further work to dissect the nature of RW variation, could provide novel targets for genetic modification for improved biofuel feedstocks. BioMed Central 2012-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3541151/ /pubmed/23173900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-83 Text en Copyright ©2012 Brereton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Brereton, Nicholas JB
Ray, Michael J
Shield, Ian
Martin, Peter
Karp, Angela
Murphy, Richard J
Reaction wood – a key cause of variation in cell wall recalcitrance in willow
title Reaction wood – a key cause of variation in cell wall recalcitrance in willow
title_full Reaction wood – a key cause of variation in cell wall recalcitrance in willow
title_fullStr Reaction wood – a key cause of variation in cell wall recalcitrance in willow
title_full_unstemmed Reaction wood – a key cause of variation in cell wall recalcitrance in willow
title_short Reaction wood – a key cause of variation in cell wall recalcitrance in willow
title_sort reaction wood – a key cause of variation in cell wall recalcitrance in willow
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23173900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-83
work_keys_str_mv AT breretonnicholasjb reactionwoodakeycauseofvariationincellwallrecalcitranceinwillow
AT raymichaelj reactionwoodakeycauseofvariationincellwallrecalcitranceinwillow
AT shieldian reactionwoodakeycauseofvariationincellwallrecalcitranceinwillow
AT martinpeter reactionwoodakeycauseofvariationincellwallrecalcitranceinwillow
AT karpangela reactionwoodakeycauseofvariationincellwallrecalcitranceinwillow
AT murphyrichardj reactionwoodakeycauseofvariationincellwallrecalcitranceinwillow