Cargando…
Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals?
BACKGROUND: Revalidation for UK doctors is expected to be introduced from late 2012. For general practitioners (GPs), this entails collecting supporting information to be submitted and assessed in a revalidation portfolio every five years. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of GPs...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23253694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-123 |
_version_ | 1782255323012136960 |
---|---|
author | Coomber, Jane Charlton, Rodger Thistlethwaite, Jill E England, Liz |
author_facet | Coomber, Jane Charlton, Rodger Thistlethwaite, Jill E England, Liz |
author_sort | Coomber, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Revalidation for UK doctors is expected to be introduced from late 2012. For general practitioners (GPs), this entails collecting supporting information to be submitted and assessed in a revalidation portfolio every five years. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of GPs working in secure environments to collect supporting information for the Royal College of General Practitioners’ (RCGP) proposed revalidation portfolio. METHODS: We invited GPs working in secure environments in England to submit items of supporting information collected during the previous 12 months using criteria and standards required for the proposed RCGP revalidation portfolio and complete a GP issues log. Initial focus groups and initial and follow-up semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were held to explore GPs’ views of this process. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and identifying themes respectively. RESULTS: Of the 50 GPs who consented to participate in the study, 20 submitted a portfolio. Thirty-eight GPs participated in an initial interview, nine took part in a follow-up interview and 17 completed a GP issues log. GPs reported difficulty in collecting supporting information for valid patient feedback, full-cycle clinical audits and evidence for their extended practice role(s) as sessional practitioners in the high population turnover custodial environment. Peripatetic practitioners experienced more difficulty than their institution based counterparts collating this evidence. CONCLUSIONS: GPs working in secure environments may experience difficulties in collecting the newer types of supporting information for the proposed RCGP revalidation portfolio primarily due to their employment status within a non-medical environment and characteristics of the detainee population. Increased support from secure environment service commissioners and employers will be a prerequisite for these practitioners to enable them to re-license using the RCGP revalidation proposals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3541221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35412212013-01-11 Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? Coomber, Jane Charlton, Rodger Thistlethwaite, Jill E England, Liz BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Revalidation for UK doctors is expected to be introduced from late 2012. For general practitioners (GPs), this entails collecting supporting information to be submitted and assessed in a revalidation portfolio every five years. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of GPs working in secure environments to collect supporting information for the Royal College of General Practitioners’ (RCGP) proposed revalidation portfolio. METHODS: We invited GPs working in secure environments in England to submit items of supporting information collected during the previous 12 months using criteria and standards required for the proposed RCGP revalidation portfolio and complete a GP issues log. Initial focus groups and initial and follow-up semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were held to explore GPs’ views of this process. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and identifying themes respectively. RESULTS: Of the 50 GPs who consented to participate in the study, 20 submitted a portfolio. Thirty-eight GPs participated in an initial interview, nine took part in a follow-up interview and 17 completed a GP issues log. GPs reported difficulty in collecting supporting information for valid patient feedback, full-cycle clinical audits and evidence for their extended practice role(s) as sessional practitioners in the high population turnover custodial environment. Peripatetic practitioners experienced more difficulty than their institution based counterparts collating this evidence. CONCLUSIONS: GPs working in secure environments may experience difficulties in collecting the newer types of supporting information for the proposed RCGP revalidation portfolio primarily due to their employment status within a non-medical environment and characteristics of the detainee population. Increased support from secure environment service commissioners and employers will be a prerequisite for these practitioners to enable them to re-license using the RCGP revalidation proposals. BioMed Central 2012-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3541221/ /pubmed/23253694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-123 Text en Copyright ©2012 Coomber et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Coomber, Jane Charlton, Rodger Thistlethwaite, Jill E England, Liz Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
title | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
title_full | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
title_fullStr | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
title_short | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
title_sort | can gps working in secure environments in england re-license using the royal college of general practitioners revalidation proposals? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23253694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coomberjane cangpsworkinginsecureenvironmentsinenglandrelicenseusingtheroyalcollegeofgeneralpractitionersrevalidationproposals AT charltonrodger cangpsworkinginsecureenvironmentsinenglandrelicenseusingtheroyalcollegeofgeneralpractitionersrevalidationproposals AT thistlethwaitejille cangpsworkinginsecureenvironmentsinenglandrelicenseusingtheroyalcollegeofgeneralpractitionersrevalidationproposals AT englandliz cangpsworkinginsecureenvironmentsinenglandrelicenseusingtheroyalcollegeofgeneralpractitionersrevalidationproposals |