Cargando…

Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible

BACKGROUND: Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, DBPCFC, the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy, is time-consuming and potentially dangerous. A basophil allergen threshold sensitivity test, CD-sens, has shown promising results as a diagnostic tool in food allergy. OBJECTIVES: To ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glaumann, Susanne, Nopp, Anna, Johansson, S. G. O., Borres, Magnus P., Nilsson, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053465
_version_ 1782255324464414720
author Glaumann, Susanne
Nopp, Anna
Johansson, S. G. O.
Borres, Magnus P.
Nilsson, Caroline
author_facet Glaumann, Susanne
Nopp, Anna
Johansson, S. G. O.
Borres, Magnus P.
Nilsson, Caroline
author_sort Glaumann, Susanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, DBPCFC, the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy, is time-consuming and potentially dangerous. A basophil allergen threshold sensitivity test, CD-sens, has shown promising results as a diagnostic tool in food allergy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reproducibility of oral peanut challenge and compare the outcome to CD-sens in peanut-sensitized children. METHODS: Twenty-seven children (4–19 years) underwent a DBPCFC followed by a single-blind oral food-challenge. The peanut challenges (1 mg to 5 g) were evaluated by severity scoring. Blood samples were drawn for CD-sens before the two first challenges. RESULTS: Thirteen children (48%) did not react at any of the challenges. Fourteen reacted at both peanut challenges but not to placebo. Only two of these children reacted at the same threshold dose and with the same severity score. All other children scored differently or reacted at different doses. For children with a positive challenge the geometric mean of the ratio of the doses was 1.834 (p = 0.307) and the arithmetic mean of the difference between the severity scores was 0.143 (p = 0.952). No association was obtained between the two peanut challenges regarding severity score (r(s) = 0.11, p = 0.71) or threshold dose (r(s) = 0.35, p = 0.22). Among the children positive in peanut challenge, 12 were positive in CD-sens. Two were low-responders and could not be evaluated. Geometric mean of the ratio of CD-sens values in children with a positive challenge was 1.035 (p = 0.505) but unlike for the severity score and the threshold dose the association between the two CD-sens values was strong (r(s) = 0.94, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For a positive/negative test the reproducibility is 100% for both peanut challenge and CD-sens. However, a comparison of the degree of allergen threshold sensitivity between the two tests is not possible since the threshold dose and severity scoring is not reproducible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3541227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35412272013-01-16 Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible Glaumann, Susanne Nopp, Anna Johansson, S. G. O. Borres, Magnus P. Nilsson, Caroline PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, DBPCFC, the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy, is time-consuming and potentially dangerous. A basophil allergen threshold sensitivity test, CD-sens, has shown promising results as a diagnostic tool in food allergy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reproducibility of oral peanut challenge and compare the outcome to CD-sens in peanut-sensitized children. METHODS: Twenty-seven children (4–19 years) underwent a DBPCFC followed by a single-blind oral food-challenge. The peanut challenges (1 mg to 5 g) were evaluated by severity scoring. Blood samples were drawn for CD-sens before the two first challenges. RESULTS: Thirteen children (48%) did not react at any of the challenges. Fourteen reacted at both peanut challenges but not to placebo. Only two of these children reacted at the same threshold dose and with the same severity score. All other children scored differently or reacted at different doses. For children with a positive challenge the geometric mean of the ratio of the doses was 1.834 (p = 0.307) and the arithmetic mean of the difference between the severity scores was 0.143 (p = 0.952). No association was obtained between the two peanut challenges regarding severity score (r(s) = 0.11, p = 0.71) or threshold dose (r(s) = 0.35, p = 0.22). Among the children positive in peanut challenge, 12 were positive in CD-sens. Two were low-responders and could not be evaluated. Geometric mean of the ratio of CD-sens values in children with a positive challenge was 1.035 (p = 0.505) but unlike for the severity score and the threshold dose the association between the two CD-sens values was strong (r(s) = 0.94, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For a positive/negative test the reproducibility is 100% for both peanut challenge and CD-sens. However, a comparison of the degree of allergen threshold sensitivity between the two tests is not possible since the threshold dose and severity scoring is not reproducible. Public Library of Science 2013-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3541227/ /pubmed/23326435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053465 Text en © 2013 Glaumann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Glaumann, Susanne
Nopp, Anna
Johansson, S. G. O.
Borres, Magnus P.
Nilsson, Caroline
Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible
title Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible
title_full Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible
title_fullStr Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible
title_full_unstemmed Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible
title_short Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible
title_sort oral peanut challenge identifies an allergy but the peanut allergen threshold sensitivity is not reproducible
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053465
work_keys_str_mv AT glaumannsusanne oralpeanutchallengeidentifiesanallergybutthepeanutallergenthresholdsensitivityisnotreproducible
AT noppanna oralpeanutchallengeidentifiesanallergybutthepeanutallergenthresholdsensitivityisnotreproducible
AT johanssonsgo oralpeanutchallengeidentifiesanallergybutthepeanutallergenthresholdsensitivityisnotreproducible
AT borresmagnusp oralpeanutchallengeidentifiesanallergybutthepeanutallergenthresholdsensitivityisnotreproducible
AT nilssoncaroline oralpeanutchallengeidentifiesanallergybutthepeanutallergenthresholdsensitivityisnotreproducible