Cargando…

On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host–Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations

[Image: see text] We use thermodynamic integration (TI) and explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to estimate the absolute free energy of host–guest binding. In the unbound state, water molecules visit all of the internally accessible volume of the host, which is fully hydrated on all...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogers, Kathleen E., Ortiz-Sánchez, Juan Manuel, Baron, Riccardo, Fajer, Mikolai, de Oliveira, César Augusto F., McCammon, J. Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2012
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23316123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct300515n
_version_ 1782255406613004288
author Rogers, Kathleen E.
Ortiz-Sánchez, Juan Manuel
Baron, Riccardo
Fajer, Mikolai
de Oliveira, César Augusto F.
McCammon, J. Andrew
author_facet Rogers, Kathleen E.
Ortiz-Sánchez, Juan Manuel
Baron, Riccardo
Fajer, Mikolai
de Oliveira, César Augusto F.
McCammon, J. Andrew
author_sort Rogers, Kathleen E.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] We use thermodynamic integration (TI) and explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to estimate the absolute free energy of host–guest binding. In the unbound state, water molecules visit all of the internally accessible volume of the host, which is fully hydrated on all sides. Upon binding of an apolar guest, the toroidal host cavity is fully dehydrated; thus, during the intermediate λ stages along the integration, the hydration of the host fluctuates between hydrated and dehydrated states. Estimating free energies by TI can be especially challenging when there is a considerable difference in hydration between the two states of interest. We investigate these aspects using the popular TIP3P and TIP4P water models. TI free energy estimates through MD largely depend on water-related interactions, and water dynamics significantly affect the convergence of binding free energy calculations. Our results indicate that wetting/dewetting transitions play a major role in slowing the convergence of free energy estimation. We employ two alternative approaches—one analytical and the other empirically based on actual MD sampling—to correct for the standard state free energy. This correction is sizable (up to 4 kcal/mol), and the two approaches provide corrections that differ by about 1 kcal/mol. For the system considered here, the TIP4P water model combined with an analytical correction for the standard state free energy provides higher overall accuracy. This observation might be transferable to other systems in which water-related contributions dominate the binding process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3541752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35417522013-01-11 On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host–Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations Rogers, Kathleen E. Ortiz-Sánchez, Juan Manuel Baron, Riccardo Fajer, Mikolai de Oliveira, César Augusto F. McCammon, J. Andrew J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] We use thermodynamic integration (TI) and explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to estimate the absolute free energy of host–guest binding. In the unbound state, water molecules visit all of the internally accessible volume of the host, which is fully hydrated on all sides. Upon binding of an apolar guest, the toroidal host cavity is fully dehydrated; thus, during the intermediate λ stages along the integration, the hydration of the host fluctuates between hydrated and dehydrated states. Estimating free energies by TI can be especially challenging when there is a considerable difference in hydration between the two states of interest. We investigate these aspects using the popular TIP3P and TIP4P water models. TI free energy estimates through MD largely depend on water-related interactions, and water dynamics significantly affect the convergence of binding free energy calculations. Our results indicate that wetting/dewetting transitions play a major role in slowing the convergence of free energy estimation. We employ two alternative approaches—one analytical and the other empirically based on actual MD sampling—to correct for the standard state free energy. This correction is sizable (up to 4 kcal/mol), and the two approaches provide corrections that differ by about 1 kcal/mol. For the system considered here, the TIP4P water model combined with an analytical correction for the standard state free energy provides higher overall accuracy. This observation might be transferable to other systems in which water-related contributions dominate the binding process. American Chemical Society 2012-10-26 2013-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3541752/ /pubmed/23316123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct300515n Text en Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org.
spellingShingle Rogers, Kathleen E.
Ortiz-Sánchez, Juan Manuel
Baron, Riccardo
Fajer, Mikolai
de Oliveira, César Augusto F.
McCammon, J. Andrew
On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host–Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations
title On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host–Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations
title_full On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host–Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations
title_fullStr On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host–Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations
title_full_unstemmed On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host–Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations
title_short On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host–Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations
title_sort on the role of dewetting transitions in host–guest binding free energy calculations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23316123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct300515n
work_keys_str_mv AT rogerskathleene ontheroleofdewettingtransitionsinhostguestbindingfreeenergycalculations
AT ortizsanchezjuanmanuel ontheroleofdewettingtransitionsinhostguestbindingfreeenergycalculations
AT baronriccardo ontheroleofdewettingtransitionsinhostguestbindingfreeenergycalculations
AT fajermikolai ontheroleofdewettingtransitionsinhostguestbindingfreeenergycalculations
AT deoliveiracesaraugustof ontheroleofdewettingtransitionsinhostguestbindingfreeenergycalculations
AT mccammonjandrew ontheroleofdewettingtransitionsinhostguestbindingfreeenergycalculations