Cargando…

Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol

BACKGROUND: Little is known about shared decision-making (SDM) with Métis, First Nations and Inuit women (“Aboriginal women”). SDM is a collaborative process that engages health care professional(s) and the client in making health decisions and is fundamental for informed consent and patient-centred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jull, Janet, Stacey, Dawn, Giles, Audrey, Boyer, Yvonne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-146
_version_ 1782255417717424128
author Jull, Janet
Stacey, Dawn
Giles, Audrey
Boyer, Yvonne
author_facet Jull, Janet
Stacey, Dawn
Giles, Audrey
Boyer, Yvonne
author_sort Jull, Janet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about shared decision-making (SDM) with Métis, First Nations and Inuit women (“Aboriginal women”). SDM is a collaborative process that engages health care professional(s) and the client in making health decisions and is fundamental for informed consent and patient-centred care. The objective of this study is to explore Aboriginal women’s health and social decision-making needs and to engage Aboriginal women in culturally adapting an SDM approach. METHODS: Using participatory research principles and guided by a postcolonial theoretical lens, the proposed mixed methods research will involve three phases. Phase I is an international systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions for Aboriginal peoples’ health decision-making. Developed following dialogue with key stakeholders, proposed methods are guided by the Cochrane handbook and include a comprehensive search, screening by two independent researchers, and synthesis of findings. Phases II and III will be conducted in collaboration with Minwaashin Lodge and engage an urban Aboriginal community of women in an interpretive descriptive qualitative study. In Phase II, 10 to 13 Aboriginal women will be interviewed to explore their health/social decision-making experiences. The interview guide is based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and previous decisional needs assessments, and as appropriate may be adapted to findings from the systematic review. Digitally-recorded interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively to identify participant decision-making approaches and needs when making health/social decisions. In Phase III, there will be cultural adaptation of an SDM facilitation tool, the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide, by two focus groups consisting of five to seven Aboriginal women. The culturally adapted guide will undergo usability testing through individual interviews with five to six women who are about to make a health/social decision. Focus groups and individual interviews will be digitally-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively to identify the adaptation required and usability of the adapted decision guide. DISCUSSION: Findings from this research will produce a culturally sensitive intervention to facilitate SDM within a population of urban Aboriginal women, which can subsequently be evaluated to determine impacts on narrowing health/social decision-making inequities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3541952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35419522013-01-11 Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol Jull, Janet Stacey, Dawn Giles, Audrey Boyer, Yvonne BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Little is known about shared decision-making (SDM) with Métis, First Nations and Inuit women (“Aboriginal women”). SDM is a collaborative process that engages health care professional(s) and the client in making health decisions and is fundamental for informed consent and patient-centred care. The objective of this study is to explore Aboriginal women’s health and social decision-making needs and to engage Aboriginal women in culturally adapting an SDM approach. METHODS: Using participatory research principles and guided by a postcolonial theoretical lens, the proposed mixed methods research will involve three phases. Phase I is an international systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions for Aboriginal peoples’ health decision-making. Developed following dialogue with key stakeholders, proposed methods are guided by the Cochrane handbook and include a comprehensive search, screening by two independent researchers, and synthesis of findings. Phases II and III will be conducted in collaboration with Minwaashin Lodge and engage an urban Aboriginal community of women in an interpretive descriptive qualitative study. In Phase II, 10 to 13 Aboriginal women will be interviewed to explore their health/social decision-making experiences. The interview guide is based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and previous decisional needs assessments, and as appropriate may be adapted to findings from the systematic review. Digitally-recorded interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively to identify participant decision-making approaches and needs when making health/social decisions. In Phase III, there will be cultural adaptation of an SDM facilitation tool, the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide, by two focus groups consisting of five to seven Aboriginal women. The culturally adapted guide will undergo usability testing through individual interviews with five to six women who are about to make a health/social decision. Focus groups and individual interviews will be digitally-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively to identify the adaptation required and usability of the adapted decision guide. DISCUSSION: Findings from this research will produce a culturally sensitive intervention to facilitate SDM within a population of urban Aboriginal women, which can subsequently be evaluated to determine impacts on narrowing health/social decision-making inequities. BioMed Central 2012-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3541952/ /pubmed/23249503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-146 Text en Copyright ©2012 Jull et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Jull, Janet
Stacey, Dawn
Giles, Audrey
Boyer, Yvonne
Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
title Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
title_full Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
title_fullStr Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
title_short Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
title_sort shared decision-making and health for first nations, métis and inuit women: a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-146
work_keys_str_mv AT julljanet shareddecisionmakingandhealthforfirstnationsmetisandinuitwomenastudyprotocol
AT staceydawn shareddecisionmakingandhealthforfirstnationsmetisandinuitwomenastudyprotocol
AT gilesaudrey shareddecisionmakingandhealthforfirstnationsmetisandinuitwomenastudyprotocol
AT boyeryvonne shareddecisionmakingandhealthforfirstnationsmetisandinuitwomenastudyprotocol