Cargando…
Which health technologies should be funded? A prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money
BACKGROUND: Deciding which health technologies to fund involves confronting some of the most difficult choices in medicine. As for other countries, the Israeli health system is faced each year with having to make these difficult decisions. The Public National Advisory Committee, known as ‘the Basket...
Autores principales: | Golan, Ofra, Hansen, Paul |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-1-44 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Should science only be funded if it makes money?
Publicado: (2009) -
Health technology assessments as a mechanism for increased value for money: recommendations to the Global Fund
por: Teerawattananon, Yot, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
How Should Global Fund Use Value-for-Money Information to Sustain its Investments in Graduating Countries?
por: Kanpirom, Kitti, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery
por: Ma Quintana, José, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
When tainted money should fund public goods: fundraising professional and public moral preferences
por: Rahwan, Zoe, et al.
Publicado: (2023)