Cargando…
Biogas from Macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea?
The economic and environmental viability of dedicated terrestrial energy crops is in doubt. The production of large scale biomass (macroalgae) for biofuels in the marine environment was first tested in the late 1960’s. The culture attempts failed due to the engineering challenges of farming offshore...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23186536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-86 |
_version_ | 1782255436349571072 |
---|---|
author | Hughes, Adam D Kelly, Maeve S Black, Kenneth D Stanley, Michele S |
author_facet | Hughes, Adam D Kelly, Maeve S Black, Kenneth D Stanley, Michele S |
author_sort | Hughes, Adam D |
collection | PubMed |
description | The economic and environmental viability of dedicated terrestrial energy crops is in doubt. The production of large scale biomass (macroalgae) for biofuels in the marine environment was first tested in the late 1960’s. The culture attempts failed due to the engineering challenges of farming offshore. However the energy conversion via anaerobic digestion was successful as the biochemical composition of macroalgae makes it an ideal feedstock. The technology for the mass production of macroalgae has developed principally in China and Asia over the last 50 years to such a degree that it is now the single largest product of aquaculture. There has also been significant technology transfer and macroalgal cultivation is now well tried and tested in Europe and America. The inherent advantage of production of biofuel feedstock in the marine environment is that it does not compete with food production for land or fresh water. Here we revisit the idea of the large scale cultivation of macroalgae at sea for subsequent anaerobic digestion to produce biogas as a source of renewable energy, using a European case study as an example. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3542030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35420302013-01-11 Biogas from Macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea? Hughes, Adam D Kelly, Maeve S Black, Kenneth D Stanley, Michele S Biotechnol Biofuels Review The economic and environmental viability of dedicated terrestrial energy crops is in doubt. The production of large scale biomass (macroalgae) for biofuels in the marine environment was first tested in the late 1960’s. The culture attempts failed due to the engineering challenges of farming offshore. However the energy conversion via anaerobic digestion was successful as the biochemical composition of macroalgae makes it an ideal feedstock. The technology for the mass production of macroalgae has developed principally in China and Asia over the last 50 years to such a degree that it is now the single largest product of aquaculture. There has also been significant technology transfer and macroalgal cultivation is now well tried and tested in Europe and America. The inherent advantage of production of biofuel feedstock in the marine environment is that it does not compete with food production for land or fresh water. Here we revisit the idea of the large scale cultivation of macroalgae at sea for subsequent anaerobic digestion to produce biogas as a source of renewable energy, using a European case study as an example. BioMed Central 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3542030/ /pubmed/23186536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-86 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hughes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Hughes, Adam D Kelly, Maeve S Black, Kenneth D Stanley, Michele S Biogas from Macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea? |
title | Biogas from Macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea? |
title_full | Biogas from Macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea? |
title_fullStr | Biogas from Macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea? |
title_full_unstemmed | Biogas from Macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea? |
title_short | Biogas from Macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea? |
title_sort | biogas from macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23186536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-86 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hughesadamd biogasfrommacroalgaeisittimetorevisittheidea AT kellymaeves biogasfrommacroalgaeisittimetorevisittheidea AT blackkennethd biogasfrommacroalgaeisittimetorevisittheidea AT stanleymicheles biogasfrommacroalgaeisittimetorevisittheidea |