Cargando…

Tagmatization in Stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (Verunipeltata, Hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils

INTRODUCTION: We describe the tagmatization pattern of the anterior region of the extant stomatopod Erugosquilla massavensis. For documentation we used the autofluorescence capacities of the specimens, resulting in a significant contrast between sclerotized and membranous areas. RESULTS: The anterio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haug, Carolin, Sallam, Wafaa S, Maas, Andreas, Waloszek, Dieter, Kutschera, Verena, Haug, Joachim T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-9-31
_version_ 1782255451299119104
author Haug, Carolin
Sallam, Wafaa S
Maas, Andreas
Waloszek, Dieter
Kutschera, Verena
Haug, Joachim T
author_facet Haug, Carolin
Sallam, Wafaa S
Maas, Andreas
Waloszek, Dieter
Kutschera, Verena
Haug, Joachim T
author_sort Haug, Carolin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We describe the tagmatization pattern of the anterior region of the extant stomatopod Erugosquilla massavensis. For documentation we used the autofluorescence capacities of the specimens, resulting in a significant contrast between sclerotized and membranous areas. RESULTS: The anterior body region of E. massavensis can be grouped into three tagmata. Tagma I, the sensorial unit, comprises the segments of the eyes, antennules and antennae. This unit is set-off anteriorly from the posterior head region. Ventrally this unit surrounds a large medial sclerite, interpreted as the anterior part of the hypostome. Dorsally the antennular and antennal segments each bear a well-developed tergite. The dorsal shield is part of tagma II, most of the ventral part of which is occupied in the midline by the large, partly sclerotized posterior part of a complex combining hypostome and labrum. Tagma II includes three more segments behind the labrum, the mandibular, maxillulary and maxillary segments. Tagma III includes the maxillipedal segments, bearing five pairs of sub-chelate appendages. The dorsal sclerite of the first of these tagma-III segments, the segment of the first maxillipeds, is not included in the shield, so this segment is not part of tagma II as generally thought. The second and third segments of tagma III form a unit dorsally and ventrally. The tergites of the segments of tagma III become progressively larger from the anterior to the posterior, possibly resulting from a paedomorphic effect during evolution, which caused this reversed enlargement. CONCLUSIONS: The described pattern of tagmosis differs from current textbook knowledge. Therefore, our re-description of the anterior body area of stomatopods is of considerable impact for understanding the head evolution of Stomatopoda. Likewise, it has a bearing upon any comparisons with fossil stomatopods, as mainly sclerotized areas are fossilized, and, on a wider scale, upon larger-scale comparisons with other malacostracans and eucrustaceans in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3542093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35420932013-01-11 Tagmatization in Stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (Verunipeltata, Hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils Haug, Carolin Sallam, Wafaa S Maas, Andreas Waloszek, Dieter Kutschera, Verena Haug, Joachim T Front Zool Research INTRODUCTION: We describe the tagmatization pattern of the anterior region of the extant stomatopod Erugosquilla massavensis. For documentation we used the autofluorescence capacities of the specimens, resulting in a significant contrast between sclerotized and membranous areas. RESULTS: The anterior body region of E. massavensis can be grouped into three tagmata. Tagma I, the sensorial unit, comprises the segments of the eyes, antennules and antennae. This unit is set-off anteriorly from the posterior head region. Ventrally this unit surrounds a large medial sclerite, interpreted as the anterior part of the hypostome. Dorsally the antennular and antennal segments each bear a well-developed tergite. The dorsal shield is part of tagma II, most of the ventral part of which is occupied in the midline by the large, partly sclerotized posterior part of a complex combining hypostome and labrum. Tagma II includes three more segments behind the labrum, the mandibular, maxillulary and maxillary segments. Tagma III includes the maxillipedal segments, bearing five pairs of sub-chelate appendages. The dorsal sclerite of the first of these tagma-III segments, the segment of the first maxillipeds, is not included in the shield, so this segment is not part of tagma II as generally thought. The second and third segments of tagma III form a unit dorsally and ventrally. The tergites of the segments of tagma III become progressively larger from the anterior to the posterior, possibly resulting from a paedomorphic effect during evolution, which caused this reversed enlargement. CONCLUSIONS: The described pattern of tagmosis differs from current textbook knowledge. Therefore, our re-description of the anterior body area of stomatopods is of considerable impact for understanding the head evolution of Stomatopoda. Likewise, it has a bearing upon any comparisons with fossil stomatopods, as mainly sclerotized areas are fossilized, and, on a wider scale, upon larger-scale comparisons with other malacostracans and eucrustaceans in general. BioMed Central 2012-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3542093/ /pubmed/23148643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-9-31 Text en Copyright ©2012 Haug et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Haug, Carolin
Sallam, Wafaa S
Maas, Andreas
Waloszek, Dieter
Kutschera, Verena
Haug, Joachim T
Tagmatization in Stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (Verunipeltata, Hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils
title Tagmatization in Stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (Verunipeltata, Hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils
title_full Tagmatization in Stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (Verunipeltata, Hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils
title_fullStr Tagmatization in Stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (Verunipeltata, Hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils
title_full_unstemmed Tagmatization in Stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (Verunipeltata, Hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils
title_short Tagmatization in Stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (Verunipeltata, Hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils
title_sort tagmatization in stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (verunipeltata, hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-9-31
work_keys_str_mv AT haugcarolin tagmatizationinstomatopodareconsideringfunctionalunitsofmoderndaymantisshrimpsverunipeltatahoplocaridaandimplicationsfortheinterpretationoffossils
AT sallamwafaas tagmatizationinstomatopodareconsideringfunctionalunitsofmoderndaymantisshrimpsverunipeltatahoplocaridaandimplicationsfortheinterpretationoffossils
AT maasandreas tagmatizationinstomatopodareconsideringfunctionalunitsofmoderndaymantisshrimpsverunipeltatahoplocaridaandimplicationsfortheinterpretationoffossils
AT waloszekdieter tagmatizationinstomatopodareconsideringfunctionalunitsofmoderndaymantisshrimpsverunipeltatahoplocaridaandimplicationsfortheinterpretationoffossils
AT kutscheraverena tagmatizationinstomatopodareconsideringfunctionalunitsofmoderndaymantisshrimpsverunipeltatahoplocaridaandimplicationsfortheinterpretationoffossils
AT haugjoachimt tagmatizationinstomatopodareconsideringfunctionalunitsofmoderndaymantisshrimpsverunipeltatahoplocaridaandimplicationsfortheinterpretationoffossils