Cargando…
Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFF
There is increasing evidence that sedentary behaviour is in itself a health risk, regardless of the daily amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Therefore, sedentary behaviour should be targeted as important health behaviour. It is known that even relatively small changes of health behavi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23281722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-1 |
_version_ | 1782255452521758720 |
---|---|
author | Rutten, Geert M Savelberg, Hans H Biddle, Stuart JH Kremers, Stef PJ |
author_facet | Rutten, Geert M Savelberg, Hans H Biddle, Stuart JH Kremers, Stef PJ |
author_sort | Rutten, Geert M |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is increasing evidence that sedentary behaviour is in itself a health risk, regardless of the daily amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Therefore, sedentary behaviour should be targeted as important health behaviour. It is known that even relatively small changes of health behaviour often require serious efforts from an individual and from people in their environment to become part of their lifestyle. Therefore, interventions to promote healthy behaviours should ideally be simple, easy to perform and easily available. Since sitting is likely to be highly habitual, confrontation with an intervention should almost automatically elicit a reaction of getting up, and thus break up and reduce sitting time. One important prerequisite for successful dissemination of such an intervention could be the use of a recognisable term relating to sedentary behaviour, which should have the characteristics of an effective brand name. To become wide spread, this term may need to meet three criteria: the “Law of the few”, the “Stickiness factor”, and the “Power of context”. For that purpose we introduce STUFF: Stand Up For Fitness. STUFF can be defined as “interrupting long sitting periods by short breaks”, for instance, interrupting sitting every 30 min by standing for at least five minutes. Even though we still need evidence to test the health-enhancing effects of interrupted sitting, we hope that the introduction of STUFF will facilitate the testing of the social, psychological and health effects of interventions to reduce sitting time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3542098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35420982013-01-11 Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFF Rutten, Geert M Savelberg, Hans H Biddle, Stuart JH Kremers, Stef PJ Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Short Paper There is increasing evidence that sedentary behaviour is in itself a health risk, regardless of the daily amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Therefore, sedentary behaviour should be targeted as important health behaviour. It is known that even relatively small changes of health behaviour often require serious efforts from an individual and from people in their environment to become part of their lifestyle. Therefore, interventions to promote healthy behaviours should ideally be simple, easy to perform and easily available. Since sitting is likely to be highly habitual, confrontation with an intervention should almost automatically elicit a reaction of getting up, and thus break up and reduce sitting time. One important prerequisite for successful dissemination of such an intervention could be the use of a recognisable term relating to sedentary behaviour, which should have the characteristics of an effective brand name. To become wide spread, this term may need to meet three criteria: the “Law of the few”, the “Stickiness factor”, and the “Power of context”. For that purpose we introduce STUFF: Stand Up For Fitness. STUFF can be defined as “interrupting long sitting periods by short breaks”, for instance, interrupting sitting every 30 min by standing for at least five minutes. Even though we still need evidence to test the health-enhancing effects of interrupted sitting, we hope that the introduction of STUFF will facilitate the testing of the social, psychological and health effects of interventions to reduce sitting time. BioMed Central 2013-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3542098/ /pubmed/23281722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-1 Text en Copyright ©2013 Rutten et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Paper Rutten, Geert M Savelberg, Hans H Biddle, Stuart JH Kremers, Stef PJ Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFF |
title | Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFF |
title_full | Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFF |
title_fullStr | Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFF |
title_full_unstemmed | Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFF |
title_short | Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFF |
title_sort | interrupting long periods of sitting: good stuff |
topic | Short Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23281722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruttengeertm interruptinglongperiodsofsittinggoodstuff AT savelberghansh interruptinglongperiodsofsittinggoodstuff AT biddlestuartjh interruptinglongperiodsofsittinggoodstuff AT kremersstefpj interruptinglongperiodsofsittinggoodstuff |