Cargando…
Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer
PURPOSE: Luminal-type breast cancer has a good prognosis compared to other types, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and triple negative types. Luminal-type breast cancer is classified into luminal A and B, according to the proliferation index. We investigated the clinicopathological f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Breast Cancer Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23346168 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.401 |
_version_ | 1782255584726220800 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Han-Sung Park, Inseok Cho, Hyun Jin Gwak, Geumhee Yang, Keunho Bae, Byung Noe Kim, Ki Whan Han, Sehwan Kim, Hong-Joo Kim, Young-Duck |
author_facet | Kim, Han-Sung Park, Inseok Cho, Hyun Jin Gwak, Geumhee Yang, Keunho Bae, Byung Noe Kim, Ki Whan Han, Sehwan Kim, Hong-Joo Kim, Young-Duck |
author_sort | Kim, Han-Sung |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Luminal-type breast cancer has a good prognosis compared to other types, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and triple negative types. Luminal-type breast cancer is classified into luminal A and B, according to the proliferation index. We investigated the clinicopathological factors that affect the prognosis of the luminal-type subgroups. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and the pathologic reports of 159 luminal-type breast cancer patients who were treated between February 2005 and November 2007. We divided luminal-type breast cancer into luminal A and B, according to Ki-67 (cutoff value, 14%) and analyzed the clinicopathologic factors, such as age at diagnosis, intensity score of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, histologic grade, and Bcl-2. Moreover, we compared the disease-free survival (DFS) of each group. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, age (p=0.004), tumor size (p=0.010), lymph node metastasis (p=0.001), and Bcl-2 (p=0.002) were statistically significant factors in luminal-type breast cancer. In the multivariate analysis, lymph node (p=0.049) and Bcl-2 (p=0.034) were significant relevant factors in luminal-type breast cancer. In the subgroup analysis, the increased Bcl-2 (cutoff value, 33%) was related with a longer DFS in the luminal B group (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: In our study, luminal A breast cancer showed a longer DFS than luminal B breast cancer, further, Bcl-2 may be a potent prognostic factor in luminal-type breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3542847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Korean Breast Cancer Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35428472013-01-23 Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer Kim, Han-Sung Park, Inseok Cho, Hyun Jin Gwak, Geumhee Yang, Keunho Bae, Byung Noe Kim, Ki Whan Han, Sehwan Kim, Hong-Joo Kim, Young-Duck J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Luminal-type breast cancer has a good prognosis compared to other types, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and triple negative types. Luminal-type breast cancer is classified into luminal A and B, according to the proliferation index. We investigated the clinicopathological factors that affect the prognosis of the luminal-type subgroups. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and the pathologic reports of 159 luminal-type breast cancer patients who were treated between February 2005 and November 2007. We divided luminal-type breast cancer into luminal A and B, according to Ki-67 (cutoff value, 14%) and analyzed the clinicopathologic factors, such as age at diagnosis, intensity score of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, histologic grade, and Bcl-2. Moreover, we compared the disease-free survival (DFS) of each group. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, age (p=0.004), tumor size (p=0.010), lymph node metastasis (p=0.001), and Bcl-2 (p=0.002) were statistically significant factors in luminal-type breast cancer. In the multivariate analysis, lymph node (p=0.049) and Bcl-2 (p=0.034) were significant relevant factors in luminal-type breast cancer. In the subgroup analysis, the increased Bcl-2 (cutoff value, 33%) was related with a longer DFS in the luminal B group (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: In our study, luminal A breast cancer showed a longer DFS than luminal B breast cancer, further, Bcl-2 may be a potent prognostic factor in luminal-type breast cancer. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2012-12 2012-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3542847/ /pubmed/23346168 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.401 Text en © 2012 Korean Breast Cancer Society. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Han-Sung Park, Inseok Cho, Hyun Jin Gwak, Geumhee Yang, Keunho Bae, Byung Noe Kim, Ki Whan Han, Sehwan Kim, Hong-Joo Kim, Young-Duck Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer |
title | Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer |
title_full | Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer |
title_short | Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer |
title_sort | analysis of the potent prognostic factors in luminal-type breast cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23346168 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhansung analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer AT parkinseok analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer AT chohyunjin analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer AT gwakgeumhee analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer AT yangkeunho analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer AT baebyungnoe analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer AT kimkiwhan analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer AT hansehwan analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer AT kimhongjoo analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer AT kimyoungduck analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer |