Cargando…

Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: Luminal-type breast cancer has a good prognosis compared to other types, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and triple negative types. Luminal-type breast cancer is classified into luminal A and B, according to the proliferation index. We investigated the clinicopathological f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Han-Sung, Park, Inseok, Cho, Hyun Jin, Gwak, Geumhee, Yang, Keunho, Bae, Byung Noe, Kim, Ki Whan, Han, Sehwan, Kim, Hong-Joo, Kim, Young-Duck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23346168
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.401
_version_ 1782255584726220800
author Kim, Han-Sung
Park, Inseok
Cho, Hyun Jin
Gwak, Geumhee
Yang, Keunho
Bae, Byung Noe
Kim, Ki Whan
Han, Sehwan
Kim, Hong-Joo
Kim, Young-Duck
author_facet Kim, Han-Sung
Park, Inseok
Cho, Hyun Jin
Gwak, Geumhee
Yang, Keunho
Bae, Byung Noe
Kim, Ki Whan
Han, Sehwan
Kim, Hong-Joo
Kim, Young-Duck
author_sort Kim, Han-Sung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Luminal-type breast cancer has a good prognosis compared to other types, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and triple negative types. Luminal-type breast cancer is classified into luminal A and B, according to the proliferation index. We investigated the clinicopathological factors that affect the prognosis of the luminal-type subgroups. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and the pathologic reports of 159 luminal-type breast cancer patients who were treated between February 2005 and November 2007. We divided luminal-type breast cancer into luminal A and B, according to Ki-67 (cutoff value, 14%) and analyzed the clinicopathologic factors, such as age at diagnosis, intensity score of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, histologic grade, and Bcl-2. Moreover, we compared the disease-free survival (DFS) of each group. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, age (p=0.004), tumor size (p=0.010), lymph node metastasis (p=0.001), and Bcl-2 (p=0.002) were statistically significant factors in luminal-type breast cancer. In the multivariate analysis, lymph node (p=0.049) and Bcl-2 (p=0.034) were significant relevant factors in luminal-type breast cancer. In the subgroup analysis, the increased Bcl-2 (cutoff value, 33%) was related with a longer DFS in the luminal B group (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: In our study, luminal A breast cancer showed a longer DFS than luminal B breast cancer, further, Bcl-2 may be a potent prognostic factor in luminal-type breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3542847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35428472013-01-23 Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer Kim, Han-Sung Park, Inseok Cho, Hyun Jin Gwak, Geumhee Yang, Keunho Bae, Byung Noe Kim, Ki Whan Han, Sehwan Kim, Hong-Joo Kim, Young-Duck J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Luminal-type breast cancer has a good prognosis compared to other types, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and triple negative types. Luminal-type breast cancer is classified into luminal A and B, according to the proliferation index. We investigated the clinicopathological factors that affect the prognosis of the luminal-type subgroups. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and the pathologic reports of 159 luminal-type breast cancer patients who were treated between February 2005 and November 2007. We divided luminal-type breast cancer into luminal A and B, according to Ki-67 (cutoff value, 14%) and analyzed the clinicopathologic factors, such as age at diagnosis, intensity score of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, histologic grade, and Bcl-2. Moreover, we compared the disease-free survival (DFS) of each group. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, age (p=0.004), tumor size (p=0.010), lymph node metastasis (p=0.001), and Bcl-2 (p=0.002) were statistically significant factors in luminal-type breast cancer. In the multivariate analysis, lymph node (p=0.049) and Bcl-2 (p=0.034) were significant relevant factors in luminal-type breast cancer. In the subgroup analysis, the increased Bcl-2 (cutoff value, 33%) was related with a longer DFS in the luminal B group (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: In our study, luminal A breast cancer showed a longer DFS than luminal B breast cancer, further, Bcl-2 may be a potent prognostic factor in luminal-type breast cancer. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2012-12 2012-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3542847/ /pubmed/23346168 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.401 Text en © 2012 Korean Breast Cancer Society. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Han-Sung
Park, Inseok
Cho, Hyun Jin
Gwak, Geumhee
Yang, Keunho
Bae, Byung Noe
Kim, Ki Whan
Han, Sehwan
Kim, Hong-Joo
Kim, Young-Duck
Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer
title Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer
title_full Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer
title_short Analysis of the Potent Prognostic Factors in Luminal-Type Breast Cancer
title_sort analysis of the potent prognostic factors in luminal-type breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3542847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23346168
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.401
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhansung analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer
AT parkinseok analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer
AT chohyunjin analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer
AT gwakgeumhee analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer
AT yangkeunho analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer
AT baebyungnoe analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer
AT kimkiwhan analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer
AT hansehwan analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer
AT kimhongjoo analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer
AT kimyoungduck analysisofthepotentprognosticfactorsinluminaltypebreastcancer