Cargando…

Management of unusual genital lymphedema complication after Fournier’s gangrene: a case report

BACKGROUND: Fournier’s gangrene is a bacterial infection characterized by necrotizing fasciitis, skin and soft tissue involvement, and eventually myositis of the perineal region. Aggressive debridement of devitalized tissue and overlying skin is of paramount importance, but often leaves large defect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer Ganz, Oanna, Gumener, Raphaël, Gervaz, Pascal, Schwartz, Julien, Pittet-Cuénod, Brigitte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23259537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-26
_version_ 1782255605648457728
author Meyer Ganz, Oanna
Gumener, Raphaël
Gervaz, Pascal
Schwartz, Julien
Pittet-Cuénod, Brigitte
author_facet Meyer Ganz, Oanna
Gumener, Raphaël
Gervaz, Pascal
Schwartz, Julien
Pittet-Cuénod, Brigitte
author_sort Meyer Ganz, Oanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fournier’s gangrene is a bacterial infection characterized by necrotizing fasciitis, skin and soft tissue involvement, and eventually myositis of the perineal region. Aggressive debridement of devitalized tissue and overlying skin is of paramount importance, but often leaves large defects to be reconstructed. The present case reports successful extensive perineal defects coverage following Fournier’s gangrene and management of subsequent penile lymphoedema impairing sexual function in a young patient. CASE PRESENTATION: Following perianal abscess drainage, a healthy young man presented with scrotal pain. Fournier’s gangrene was diagnosed and treated with multiple surgical debridements. Tissue excision extended through the entire perineal area, base of the penile shaft, lower abdominal region, the inner thighs, and gluteal region, corresponding to 12% of the total body surface area. After serial debridements and negative pressure dressings, the defect was covered by two stages of skin grafting. Graft take was 90%. Healing was achieved without hypertrophic or retractile scar. However, chronic penile lymphedema remained and was first treated with compressive garments for 2 years. Upon failure of this conservative approach, we performed a circumcision, but only a “penile lift” allowed a satisfactory esthetical and functional result. CONCLUSION: Fournier’s gangrene can be complicated by a chronic lymphedema of the penis. Conservative treatment is likely to fail in severe cases and can be treated surgically by “penile lift”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3543169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35431692013-01-14 Management of unusual genital lymphedema complication after Fournier’s gangrene: a case report Meyer Ganz, Oanna Gumener, Raphaël Gervaz, Pascal Schwartz, Julien Pittet-Cuénod, Brigitte BMC Surg Case Report BACKGROUND: Fournier’s gangrene is a bacterial infection characterized by necrotizing fasciitis, skin and soft tissue involvement, and eventually myositis of the perineal region. Aggressive debridement of devitalized tissue and overlying skin is of paramount importance, but often leaves large defects to be reconstructed. The present case reports successful extensive perineal defects coverage following Fournier’s gangrene and management of subsequent penile lymphoedema impairing sexual function in a young patient. CASE PRESENTATION: Following perianal abscess drainage, a healthy young man presented with scrotal pain. Fournier’s gangrene was diagnosed and treated with multiple surgical debridements. Tissue excision extended through the entire perineal area, base of the penile shaft, lower abdominal region, the inner thighs, and gluteal region, corresponding to 12% of the total body surface area. After serial debridements and negative pressure dressings, the defect was covered by two stages of skin grafting. Graft take was 90%. Healing was achieved without hypertrophic or retractile scar. However, chronic penile lymphedema remained and was first treated with compressive garments for 2 years. Upon failure of this conservative approach, we performed a circumcision, but only a “penile lift” allowed a satisfactory esthetical and functional result. CONCLUSION: Fournier’s gangrene can be complicated by a chronic lymphedema of the penis. Conservative treatment is likely to fail in severe cases and can be treated surgically by “penile lift”. BioMed Central 2012-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3543169/ /pubmed/23259537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-26 Text en Copyright ©2012 Meyer Ganz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Meyer Ganz, Oanna
Gumener, Raphaël
Gervaz, Pascal
Schwartz, Julien
Pittet-Cuénod, Brigitte
Management of unusual genital lymphedema complication after Fournier’s gangrene: a case report
title Management of unusual genital lymphedema complication after Fournier’s gangrene: a case report
title_full Management of unusual genital lymphedema complication after Fournier’s gangrene: a case report
title_fullStr Management of unusual genital lymphedema complication after Fournier’s gangrene: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Management of unusual genital lymphedema complication after Fournier’s gangrene: a case report
title_short Management of unusual genital lymphedema complication after Fournier’s gangrene: a case report
title_sort management of unusual genital lymphedema complication after fournier’s gangrene: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23259537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-26
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerganzoanna managementofunusualgenitallymphedemacomplicationafterfourniersgangreneacasereport
AT gumenerraphael managementofunusualgenitallymphedemacomplicationafterfourniersgangreneacasereport
AT gervazpascal managementofunusualgenitallymphedemacomplicationafterfourniersgangreneacasereport
AT schwartzjulien managementofunusualgenitallymphedemacomplicationafterfourniersgangreneacasereport
AT pittetcuenodbrigitte managementofunusualgenitallymphedemacomplicationafterfourniersgangreneacasereport