Cargando…

How deep is deep enough for RNA-Seq profiling of bacterial transcriptomes?

BACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing of cDNA libraries (RNA-Seq) has proven to be a highly effective approach for studying bacterial transcriptomes. A central challenge in designing RNA-Seq-based experiments is estimating a priori the number of reads per sample needed to detect and quantify thousa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haas, Brian J, Chin, Melissa, Nusbaum, Chad, Birren, Bruce W, Livny, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23270466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-734
_version_ 1782255612865806336
author Haas, Brian J
Chin, Melissa
Nusbaum, Chad
Birren, Bruce W
Livny, Jonathan
author_facet Haas, Brian J
Chin, Melissa
Nusbaum, Chad
Birren, Bruce W
Livny, Jonathan
author_sort Haas, Brian J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing of cDNA libraries (RNA-Seq) has proven to be a highly effective approach for studying bacterial transcriptomes. A central challenge in designing RNA-Seq-based experiments is estimating a priori the number of reads per sample needed to detect and quantify thousands of individual transcripts with a large dynamic range of abundance. RESULTS: We have conducted a systematic examination of how changes in the number of RNA-Seq reads per sample influences both profiling of a single bacterial transcriptome and the comparison of gene expression among samples. Our findings suggest that the number of reads typically produced in a single lane of the Illumina HiSeq sequencer far exceeds the number needed to saturate the annotated transcriptomes of diverse bacteria growing in monoculture. Moreover, as sequencing depth increases, so too does the detection of cDNAs that likely correspond to spurious transcripts or genomic DNA contamination. Finally, even when dozens of barcoded individual cDNA libraries are sequenced in a single lane, the vast majority of transcripts in each sample can be detected and numerous genes differentially expressed between samples can be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis provides a guide for the many researchers seeking to determine the appropriate sequencing depth for RNA-Seq-based studies of diverse bacterial species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3543199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35431992013-01-14 How deep is deep enough for RNA-Seq profiling of bacterial transcriptomes? Haas, Brian J Chin, Melissa Nusbaum, Chad Birren, Bruce W Livny, Jonathan BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing of cDNA libraries (RNA-Seq) has proven to be a highly effective approach for studying bacterial transcriptomes. A central challenge in designing RNA-Seq-based experiments is estimating a priori the number of reads per sample needed to detect and quantify thousands of individual transcripts with a large dynamic range of abundance. RESULTS: We have conducted a systematic examination of how changes in the number of RNA-Seq reads per sample influences both profiling of a single bacterial transcriptome and the comparison of gene expression among samples. Our findings suggest that the number of reads typically produced in a single lane of the Illumina HiSeq sequencer far exceeds the number needed to saturate the annotated transcriptomes of diverse bacteria growing in monoculture. Moreover, as sequencing depth increases, so too does the detection of cDNAs that likely correspond to spurious transcripts or genomic DNA contamination. Finally, even when dozens of barcoded individual cDNA libraries are sequenced in a single lane, the vast majority of transcripts in each sample can be detected and numerous genes differentially expressed between samples can be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis provides a guide for the many researchers seeking to determine the appropriate sequencing depth for RNA-Seq-based studies of diverse bacterial species. BioMed Central 2012-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3543199/ /pubmed/23270466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-734 Text en Copyright ©2012 Haas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haas, Brian J
Chin, Melissa
Nusbaum, Chad
Birren, Bruce W
Livny, Jonathan
How deep is deep enough for RNA-Seq profiling of bacterial transcriptomes?
title How deep is deep enough for RNA-Seq profiling of bacterial transcriptomes?
title_full How deep is deep enough for RNA-Seq profiling of bacterial transcriptomes?
title_fullStr How deep is deep enough for RNA-Seq profiling of bacterial transcriptomes?
title_full_unstemmed How deep is deep enough for RNA-Seq profiling of bacterial transcriptomes?
title_short How deep is deep enough for RNA-Seq profiling of bacterial transcriptomes?
title_sort how deep is deep enough for rna-seq profiling of bacterial transcriptomes?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23270466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-734
work_keys_str_mv AT haasbrianj howdeepisdeepenoughforrnaseqprofilingofbacterialtranscriptomes
AT chinmelissa howdeepisdeepenoughforrnaseqprofilingofbacterialtranscriptomes
AT nusbaumchad howdeepisdeepenoughforrnaseqprofilingofbacterialtranscriptomes
AT birrenbrucew howdeepisdeepenoughforrnaseqprofilingofbacterialtranscriptomes
AT livnyjonathan howdeepisdeepenoughforrnaseqprofilingofbacterialtranscriptomes