Cargando…

General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis

BACKGROUND: In Germany, clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies in primary care are still very rare, while their usefulness has been recognised in many other countries. A network of researchers from German academic general practice has explored the reasons for this discrepancy. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hummers-Pradier, Eva, Bleidorn, Jutta, Schmiemann, Guido, Joos, Stefanie, Becker, Annette, Altiner, Attila, Chenot, Jean-François, Scherer, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23136890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-205
_version_ 1782255634860736512
author Hummers-Pradier, Eva
Bleidorn, Jutta
Schmiemann, Guido
Joos, Stefanie
Becker, Annette
Altiner, Attila
Chenot, Jean-François
Scherer, Martin
author_facet Hummers-Pradier, Eva
Bleidorn, Jutta
Schmiemann, Guido
Joos, Stefanie
Becker, Annette
Altiner, Attila
Chenot, Jean-François
Scherer, Martin
author_sort Hummers-Pradier, Eva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Germany, clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies in primary care are still very rare, while their usefulness has been recognised in many other countries. A network of researchers from German academic general practice has explored the reasons for this discrepancy. METHODS: Based on a comprehensive literature review and expert group discussions, problem analyses as well as structural and procedural prerequisites for a better implementation of clinical trials in German primary care are presented. RESULTS: In Germany, basic biomedical science and technology is more reputed than clinical or health services research. Clinical trials are funded by industry or a single national programme, which is highly competitive, specialist-dominated, exclusive of pilot studies, and usually favours innovation rather than comparative effectiveness studies. Academic general practice is still not fully implemented, and existing departments are small. Most general practitioners (GPs) work in a market-based, competitive setting of small private practices, with a high case load. They have no protected time or funding for research, and mostly no research training or experience. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) training is compulsory for participation in clinical trials. The group defined three work packages to be addressed regarding clinical trials in German general practice: (1) problem analysis, and definition of (2) structural prerequisites and (3) procedural prerequisites. Structural prerequisites comprise specific support facilities for general practice-based research networks that could provide practices with a point of contact. Procedural prerequisites consist, for example, of a summary of specific relevant key measures, for example on a web platform. The platform should contain standard operating procedures (SOPs), templates, checklists and other supporting materials for researchers. CONCLUSION: All in all, our problem analyses revealed that a substantial number of barriers contribute to the low implementation of clinical research in German general practice. Some issues are deeply rooted in Germany’s market-based healthcare and academic systems and traditions. However, new developments may facilitate change: recent developments in the German research landscape are encouraging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3543296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35432962013-01-14 General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis Hummers-Pradier, Eva Bleidorn, Jutta Schmiemann, Guido Joos, Stefanie Becker, Annette Altiner, Attila Chenot, Jean-François Scherer, Martin Trials Research BACKGROUND: In Germany, clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies in primary care are still very rare, while their usefulness has been recognised in many other countries. A network of researchers from German academic general practice has explored the reasons for this discrepancy. METHODS: Based on a comprehensive literature review and expert group discussions, problem analyses as well as structural and procedural prerequisites for a better implementation of clinical trials in German primary care are presented. RESULTS: In Germany, basic biomedical science and technology is more reputed than clinical or health services research. Clinical trials are funded by industry or a single national programme, which is highly competitive, specialist-dominated, exclusive of pilot studies, and usually favours innovation rather than comparative effectiveness studies. Academic general practice is still not fully implemented, and existing departments are small. Most general practitioners (GPs) work in a market-based, competitive setting of small private practices, with a high case load. They have no protected time or funding for research, and mostly no research training or experience. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) training is compulsory for participation in clinical trials. The group defined three work packages to be addressed regarding clinical trials in German general practice: (1) problem analysis, and definition of (2) structural prerequisites and (3) procedural prerequisites. Structural prerequisites comprise specific support facilities for general practice-based research networks that could provide practices with a point of contact. Procedural prerequisites consist, for example, of a summary of specific relevant key measures, for example on a web platform. The platform should contain standard operating procedures (SOPs), templates, checklists and other supporting materials for researchers. CONCLUSION: All in all, our problem analyses revealed that a substantial number of barriers contribute to the low implementation of clinical research in German general practice. Some issues are deeply rooted in Germany’s market-based healthcare and academic systems and traditions. However, new developments may facilitate change: recent developments in the German research landscape are encouraging. BioMed Central 2012-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3543296/ /pubmed/23136890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-205 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hummers-Pradier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hummers-Pradier, Eva
Bleidorn, Jutta
Schmiemann, Guido
Joos, Stefanie
Becker, Annette
Altiner, Attila
Chenot, Jean-François
Scherer, Martin
General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis
title General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis
title_full General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis
title_fullStr General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis
title_full_unstemmed General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis
title_short General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis
title_sort general practice-based clinical trials in germany - a problem analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23136890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-205
work_keys_str_mv AT hummerspradiereva generalpracticebasedclinicaltrialsingermanyaproblemanalysis
AT bleidornjutta generalpracticebasedclinicaltrialsingermanyaproblemanalysis
AT schmiemannguido generalpracticebasedclinicaltrialsingermanyaproblemanalysis
AT joosstefanie generalpracticebasedclinicaltrialsingermanyaproblemanalysis
AT beckerannette generalpracticebasedclinicaltrialsingermanyaproblemanalysis
AT altinerattila generalpracticebasedclinicaltrialsingermanyaproblemanalysis
AT chenotjeanfrancois generalpracticebasedclinicaltrialsingermanyaproblemanalysis
AT scherermartin generalpracticebasedclinicaltrialsingermanyaproblemanalysis