Cargando…
A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous recanalization of total coronary occlusion (TCO) was historically hampered by high rates of restenosis and reocclusions. The PRISON II trial demonstrated a significant restenosis reduction in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23241457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-240 |
_version_ | 1782255648100057088 |
---|---|
author | Teeuwen, Koen Adriaenssens, Tom Van den Branden, Ben JL Henriques, José PS Van der Schaaf, Rene J Koolen, Jacques J Vermeersch, Paul HMJ Bosschaert, Mike AR Tijssen, Jan GP Suttorp, Maarten J |
author_facet | Teeuwen, Koen Adriaenssens, Tom Van den Branden, Ben JL Henriques, José PS Van der Schaaf, Rene J Koolen, Jacques J Vermeersch, Paul HMJ Bosschaert, Mike AR Tijssen, Jan GP Suttorp, Maarten J |
author_sort | Teeuwen, Koen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous recanalization of total coronary occlusion (TCO) was historically hampered by high rates of restenosis and reocclusions. The PRISON II trial demonstrated a significant restenosis reduction in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents for TCO. Similar reductions in restenosis were observed with the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent. Despite favorable anti-restenotic efficacy, safety concerns evolved after identifying an increased rate of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of TCO. Late malapposition caused by hypersensitivity reactions and chronic inflammation was suggested as a probable cause of these VLST. New DES with bioresorbable polymer coatings were developed to address these safety concerns. No randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of the new-generation DES with bioresorbable polymers in patients treated for TCO. METHODS/DESIGN: The prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority PRISON IV trial was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and angiographic outcome of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymers (Orsiro; Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymers (Xience Prime/Xpedition; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in patients with successfully recanalized TCOs. In total, 330 patients have been randomly allocated to each treatment arm. Patients are eligible with estimated duration of TCO ≥4 weeks with evidence of ischemia in the supply area of the TCO. The primary endpoint is in-segment late luminal loss at 9-month follow-up angiography. Secondary angiographic endpoints include in-stent late luminal loss, minimal luminal diameter, percentage of diameter stenosis, in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis and reocclusions at 9-month follow-up. Additionally, optical coherence tomography is performed in the first 60 randomized patients at 9 months to assess neointima thickness, percentage of neointima coverage, and stent strut malapposition and coverage. Personnel blinded to the allocated treatment will review all angiographic and optical coherence assessments. Secondary clinical endpoints include major adverse cardiac events, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, target vessel failure and stent thrombosis to 5-year clinical follow-up. An independent clinical event committee blinded to the allocated treatment will review all clinical events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01516723. Patient recruitment started in February 2012. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3543352 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35433522013-01-14 A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study Teeuwen, Koen Adriaenssens, Tom Van den Branden, Ben JL Henriques, José PS Van der Schaaf, Rene J Koolen, Jacques J Vermeersch, Paul HMJ Bosschaert, Mike AR Tijssen, Jan GP Suttorp, Maarten J Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Percutaneous recanalization of total coronary occlusion (TCO) was historically hampered by high rates of restenosis and reocclusions. The PRISON II trial demonstrated a significant restenosis reduction in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents for TCO. Similar reductions in restenosis were observed with the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent. Despite favorable anti-restenotic efficacy, safety concerns evolved after identifying an increased rate of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of TCO. Late malapposition caused by hypersensitivity reactions and chronic inflammation was suggested as a probable cause of these VLST. New DES with bioresorbable polymer coatings were developed to address these safety concerns. No randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of the new-generation DES with bioresorbable polymers in patients treated for TCO. METHODS/DESIGN: The prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority PRISON IV trial was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and angiographic outcome of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymers (Orsiro; Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymers (Xience Prime/Xpedition; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in patients with successfully recanalized TCOs. In total, 330 patients have been randomly allocated to each treatment arm. Patients are eligible with estimated duration of TCO ≥4 weeks with evidence of ischemia in the supply area of the TCO. The primary endpoint is in-segment late luminal loss at 9-month follow-up angiography. Secondary angiographic endpoints include in-stent late luminal loss, minimal luminal diameter, percentage of diameter stenosis, in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis and reocclusions at 9-month follow-up. Additionally, optical coherence tomography is performed in the first 60 randomized patients at 9 months to assess neointima thickness, percentage of neointima coverage, and stent strut malapposition and coverage. Personnel blinded to the allocated treatment will review all angiographic and optical coherence assessments. Secondary clinical endpoints include major adverse cardiac events, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, target vessel failure and stent thrombosis to 5-year clinical follow-up. An independent clinical event committee blinded to the allocated treatment will review all clinical events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01516723. Patient recruitment started in February 2012. BioMed Central 2012-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3543352/ /pubmed/23241457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-240 Text en Copyright ©2012 Teeuwen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Teeuwen, Koen Adriaenssens, Tom Van den Branden, Ben JL Henriques, José PS Van der Schaaf, Rene J Koolen, Jacques J Vermeersch, Paul HMJ Bosschaert, Mike AR Tijssen, Jan GP Suttorp, Maarten J A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study |
title | A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study |
title_full | A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study |
title_fullStr | A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study |
title_short | A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study |
title_sort | randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the primary stenting of occluded native coronary arteries iv study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23241457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teeuwenkoen arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT adriaenssenstom arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT vandenbrandenbenjl arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT henriquesjoseps arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT vanderschaafrenej arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT koolenjacquesj arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT vermeerschpaulhmj arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT bosschaertmikear arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT tijssenjangp arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT suttorpmaartenj arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT teeuwenkoen randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT adriaenssenstom randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT vandenbrandenbenjl randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT henriquesjoseps randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT vanderschaafrenej randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT koolenjacquesj randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT vermeerschpaulhmj randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT bosschaertmikear randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT tijssenjangp randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy AT suttorpmaartenj randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy |