Cargando…

A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous recanalization of total coronary occlusion (TCO) was historically hampered by high rates of restenosis and reocclusions. The PRISON II trial demonstrated a significant restenosis reduction in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teeuwen, Koen, Adriaenssens, Tom, Van den Branden, Ben JL, Henriques, José PS, Van der Schaaf, Rene J, Koolen, Jacques J, Vermeersch, Paul HMJ, Bosschaert, Mike AR, Tijssen, Jan GP, Suttorp, Maarten J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23241457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-240
_version_ 1782255648100057088
author Teeuwen, Koen
Adriaenssens, Tom
Van den Branden, Ben JL
Henriques, José PS
Van der Schaaf, Rene J
Koolen, Jacques J
Vermeersch, Paul HMJ
Bosschaert, Mike AR
Tijssen, Jan GP
Suttorp, Maarten J
author_facet Teeuwen, Koen
Adriaenssens, Tom
Van den Branden, Ben JL
Henriques, José PS
Van der Schaaf, Rene J
Koolen, Jacques J
Vermeersch, Paul HMJ
Bosschaert, Mike AR
Tijssen, Jan GP
Suttorp, Maarten J
author_sort Teeuwen, Koen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous recanalization of total coronary occlusion (TCO) was historically hampered by high rates of restenosis and reocclusions. The PRISON II trial demonstrated a significant restenosis reduction in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents for TCO. Similar reductions in restenosis were observed with the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent. Despite favorable anti-restenotic efficacy, safety concerns evolved after identifying an increased rate of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of TCO. Late malapposition caused by hypersensitivity reactions and chronic inflammation was suggested as a probable cause of these VLST. New DES with bioresorbable polymer coatings were developed to address these safety concerns. No randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of the new-generation DES with bioresorbable polymers in patients treated for TCO. METHODS/DESIGN: The prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority PRISON IV trial was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and angiographic outcome of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymers (Orsiro; Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymers (Xience Prime/Xpedition; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in patients with successfully recanalized TCOs. In total, 330 patients have been randomly allocated to each treatment arm. Patients are eligible with estimated duration of TCO ≥4 weeks with evidence of ischemia in the supply area of the TCO. The primary endpoint is in-segment late luminal loss at 9-month follow-up angiography. Secondary angiographic endpoints include in-stent late luminal loss, minimal luminal diameter, percentage of diameter stenosis, in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis and reocclusions at 9-month follow-up. Additionally, optical coherence tomography is performed in the first 60 randomized patients at 9 months to assess neointima thickness, percentage of neointima coverage, and stent strut malapposition and coverage. Personnel blinded to the allocated treatment will review all angiographic and optical coherence assessments. Secondary clinical endpoints include major adverse cardiac events, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, target vessel failure and stent thrombosis to 5-year clinical follow-up. An independent clinical event committee blinded to the allocated treatment will review all clinical events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01516723. Patient recruitment started in February 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3543352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35433522013-01-14 A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study Teeuwen, Koen Adriaenssens, Tom Van den Branden, Ben JL Henriques, José PS Van der Schaaf, Rene J Koolen, Jacques J Vermeersch, Paul HMJ Bosschaert, Mike AR Tijssen, Jan GP Suttorp, Maarten J Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Percutaneous recanalization of total coronary occlusion (TCO) was historically hampered by high rates of restenosis and reocclusions. The PRISON II trial demonstrated a significant restenosis reduction in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents for TCO. Similar reductions in restenosis were observed with the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent. Despite favorable anti-restenotic efficacy, safety concerns evolved after identifying an increased rate of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of TCO. Late malapposition caused by hypersensitivity reactions and chronic inflammation was suggested as a probable cause of these VLST. New DES with bioresorbable polymer coatings were developed to address these safety concerns. No randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of the new-generation DES with bioresorbable polymers in patients treated for TCO. METHODS/DESIGN: The prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority PRISON IV trial was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and angiographic outcome of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymers (Orsiro; Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymers (Xience Prime/Xpedition; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in patients with successfully recanalized TCOs. In total, 330 patients have been randomly allocated to each treatment arm. Patients are eligible with estimated duration of TCO ≥4 weeks with evidence of ischemia in the supply area of the TCO. The primary endpoint is in-segment late luminal loss at 9-month follow-up angiography. Secondary angiographic endpoints include in-stent late luminal loss, minimal luminal diameter, percentage of diameter stenosis, in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis and reocclusions at 9-month follow-up. Additionally, optical coherence tomography is performed in the first 60 randomized patients at 9 months to assess neointima thickness, percentage of neointima coverage, and stent strut malapposition and coverage. Personnel blinded to the allocated treatment will review all angiographic and optical coherence assessments. Secondary clinical endpoints include major adverse cardiac events, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, target vessel failure and stent thrombosis to 5-year clinical follow-up. An independent clinical event committee blinded to the allocated treatment will review all clinical events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01516723. Patient recruitment started in February 2012. BioMed Central 2012-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3543352/ /pubmed/23241457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-240 Text en Copyright ©2012 Teeuwen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Teeuwen, Koen
Adriaenssens, Tom
Van den Branden, Ben JL
Henriques, José PS
Van der Schaaf, Rene J
Koolen, Jacques J
Vermeersch, Paul HMJ
Bosschaert, Mike AR
Tijssen, Jan GP
Suttorp, Maarten J
A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study
title A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study
title_full A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study
title_fullStr A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study
title_full_unstemmed A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study
title_short A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study
title_sort randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the primary stenting of occluded native coronary arteries iv study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23241457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-240
work_keys_str_mv AT teeuwenkoen arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT adriaenssenstom arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT vandenbrandenbenjl arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT henriquesjoseps arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT vanderschaafrenej arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT koolenjacquesj arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT vermeerschpaulhmj arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT bosschaertmikear arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT tijssenjangp arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT suttorpmaartenj arandomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT teeuwenkoen randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT adriaenssenstom randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT vandenbrandenbenjl randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT henriquesjoseps randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT vanderschaafrenej randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT koolenjacquesj randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT vermeerschpaulhmj randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT bosschaertmikear randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT tijssenjangp randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy
AT suttorpmaartenj randomizedmulticentercomparisonofhybridsirolimuselutingstentswithbioresorbablepolymerversuseverolimuselutingstentswithdurablepolymerintotalcoronaryocclusionrationaleanddesignoftheprimarystentingofoccludednativecoronaryarteriesivstudy