Cargando…
Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa
BACKGROUND: HIV-infected women are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Women living in resource-limited countries are especially at risk due to poor access to cervical cancer screening and treatment. We evaluated three cervical cancer screening methods to detect cervical intraepithelia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053494 |
_version_ | 1782255658190503936 |
---|---|
author | Firnhaber, Cynthia Mayisela, Nomtha Mao, Lu Williams, Sophie Swarts, Avril Faesen, Mark Levin, Simon Michelow, Pam Omar, Tanvier Hudgens, Michael G. Williamson, Anna-Lise Allan, Bruce Lewis, David A. Smith, Jennifer S. |
author_facet | Firnhaber, Cynthia Mayisela, Nomtha Mao, Lu Williams, Sophie Swarts, Avril Faesen, Mark Levin, Simon Michelow, Pam Omar, Tanvier Hudgens, Michael G. Williamson, Anna-Lise Allan, Bruce Lewis, David A. Smith, Jennifer S. |
author_sort | Firnhaber, Cynthia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: HIV-infected women are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Women living in resource-limited countries are especially at risk due to poor access to cervical cancer screening and treatment. We evaluated three cervical cancer screening methods to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and above (CIN 2+) in HIV-infected women in South Africa; Pap smear, visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA) and human papillomavirus detection (HPV). METHODS: HIV-infected women aged 18–65 were recruited in Johannesburg. A cross-sectional study evaluating three screening methods for the detection of the histologically-defined gold standard CIN-2 + was performed. Women were screened for cervical abnormalities with the Digene HC2 assay (HPV), Pap smear and VIA. VIA was performed by clinic nurses, digital photographs taken and then later reviewed by specialist physicians. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive valves for CIN-2 + were calculated using maximum likelihood estimators. RESULTS: 1,202 HIV-infected women participated, with a median age of 38 years and CD4 counts of 394 cells/mm(3). One third of women had a high grade lesion on cytology. VIA and HPV were positive in 45% and 61% of women respectively. Estimated sensitivity/specificity for HPV, Pap smear and VIA for CIN 2+ was 92%/51.4%, 75.8%/83.4% and 65.4/68.5% (nurse reading), respectively. Sensitivities were similar, and specificities appeared significantly lower for the HPV test, cytology and VIA among women with CD4 counts ≤200 cells/mm(3) as compared to CD4 counts >350 cells/mm(3). CONCLUSIONS: Although HPV was the most sensitive screening method for detecting CIN 2+, it was less specific than conventional cytology and VIA with digital imaging review. Screening programs may need to be individualized in context of the resources and capacity in each area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3543403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35434032013-01-16 Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa Firnhaber, Cynthia Mayisela, Nomtha Mao, Lu Williams, Sophie Swarts, Avril Faesen, Mark Levin, Simon Michelow, Pam Omar, Tanvier Hudgens, Michael G. Williamson, Anna-Lise Allan, Bruce Lewis, David A. Smith, Jennifer S. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: HIV-infected women are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Women living in resource-limited countries are especially at risk due to poor access to cervical cancer screening and treatment. We evaluated three cervical cancer screening methods to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and above (CIN 2+) in HIV-infected women in South Africa; Pap smear, visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA) and human papillomavirus detection (HPV). METHODS: HIV-infected women aged 18–65 were recruited in Johannesburg. A cross-sectional study evaluating three screening methods for the detection of the histologically-defined gold standard CIN-2 + was performed. Women were screened for cervical abnormalities with the Digene HC2 assay (HPV), Pap smear and VIA. VIA was performed by clinic nurses, digital photographs taken and then later reviewed by specialist physicians. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive valves for CIN-2 + were calculated using maximum likelihood estimators. RESULTS: 1,202 HIV-infected women participated, with a median age of 38 years and CD4 counts of 394 cells/mm(3). One third of women had a high grade lesion on cytology. VIA and HPV were positive in 45% and 61% of women respectively. Estimated sensitivity/specificity for HPV, Pap smear and VIA for CIN 2+ was 92%/51.4%, 75.8%/83.4% and 65.4/68.5% (nurse reading), respectively. Sensitivities were similar, and specificities appeared significantly lower for the HPV test, cytology and VIA among women with CD4 counts ≤200 cells/mm(3) as compared to CD4 counts >350 cells/mm(3). CONCLUSIONS: Although HPV was the most sensitive screening method for detecting CIN 2+, it was less specific than conventional cytology and VIA with digital imaging review. Screening programs may need to be individualized in context of the resources and capacity in each area. Public Library of Science 2013-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3543403/ /pubmed/23326441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053494 Text en © 2013 Firnhaber et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Firnhaber, Cynthia Mayisela, Nomtha Mao, Lu Williams, Sophie Swarts, Avril Faesen, Mark Levin, Simon Michelow, Pam Omar, Tanvier Hudgens, Michael G. Williamson, Anna-Lise Allan, Bruce Lewis, David A. Smith, Jennifer S. Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa |
title | Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa |
title_full | Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa |
title_fullStr | Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa |
title_short | Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa |
title_sort | validation of cervical cancer screening methods in hiv positive women from johannesburg south africa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT firnhabercynthia validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT mayiselanomtha validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT maolu validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT williamssophie validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT swartsavril validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT faesenmark validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT levinsimon validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT michelowpam validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT omartanvier validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT hudgensmichaelg validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT williamsonannalise validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT allanbruce validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT lewisdavida validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica AT smithjennifers validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica |