Cargando…

Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa

BACKGROUND: HIV-infected women are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Women living in resource-limited countries are especially at risk due to poor access to cervical cancer screening and treatment. We evaluated three cervical cancer screening methods to detect cervical intraepithelia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Firnhaber, Cynthia, Mayisela, Nomtha, Mao, Lu, Williams, Sophie, Swarts, Avril, Faesen, Mark, Levin, Simon, Michelow, Pam, Omar, Tanvier, Hudgens, Michael G., Williamson, Anna-Lise, Allan, Bruce, Lewis, David A., Smith, Jennifer S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053494
_version_ 1782255658190503936
author Firnhaber, Cynthia
Mayisela, Nomtha
Mao, Lu
Williams, Sophie
Swarts, Avril
Faesen, Mark
Levin, Simon
Michelow, Pam
Omar, Tanvier
Hudgens, Michael G.
Williamson, Anna-Lise
Allan, Bruce
Lewis, David A.
Smith, Jennifer S.
author_facet Firnhaber, Cynthia
Mayisela, Nomtha
Mao, Lu
Williams, Sophie
Swarts, Avril
Faesen, Mark
Levin, Simon
Michelow, Pam
Omar, Tanvier
Hudgens, Michael G.
Williamson, Anna-Lise
Allan, Bruce
Lewis, David A.
Smith, Jennifer S.
author_sort Firnhaber, Cynthia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HIV-infected women are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Women living in resource-limited countries are especially at risk due to poor access to cervical cancer screening and treatment. We evaluated three cervical cancer screening methods to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and above (CIN 2+) in HIV-infected women in South Africa; Pap smear, visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA) and human papillomavirus detection (HPV). METHODS: HIV-infected women aged 18–65 were recruited in Johannesburg. A cross-sectional study evaluating three screening methods for the detection of the histologically-defined gold standard CIN-2 + was performed. Women were screened for cervical abnormalities with the Digene HC2 assay (HPV), Pap smear and VIA. VIA was performed by clinic nurses, digital photographs taken and then later reviewed by specialist physicians. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive valves for CIN-2 + were calculated using maximum likelihood estimators. RESULTS: 1,202 HIV-infected women participated, with a median age of 38 years and CD4 counts of 394 cells/mm(3). One third of women had a high grade lesion on cytology. VIA and HPV were positive in 45% and 61% of women respectively. Estimated sensitivity/specificity for HPV, Pap smear and VIA for CIN 2+ was 92%/51.4%, 75.8%/83.4% and 65.4/68.5% (nurse reading), respectively. Sensitivities were similar, and specificities appeared significantly lower for the HPV test, cytology and VIA among women with CD4 counts ≤200 cells/mm(3) as compared to CD4 counts >350 cells/mm(3). CONCLUSIONS: Although HPV was the most sensitive screening method for detecting CIN 2+, it was less specific than conventional cytology and VIA with digital imaging review. Screening programs may need to be individualized in context of the resources and capacity in each area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3543403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35434032013-01-16 Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa Firnhaber, Cynthia Mayisela, Nomtha Mao, Lu Williams, Sophie Swarts, Avril Faesen, Mark Levin, Simon Michelow, Pam Omar, Tanvier Hudgens, Michael G. Williamson, Anna-Lise Allan, Bruce Lewis, David A. Smith, Jennifer S. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: HIV-infected women are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Women living in resource-limited countries are especially at risk due to poor access to cervical cancer screening and treatment. We evaluated three cervical cancer screening methods to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and above (CIN 2+) in HIV-infected women in South Africa; Pap smear, visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA) and human papillomavirus detection (HPV). METHODS: HIV-infected women aged 18–65 were recruited in Johannesburg. A cross-sectional study evaluating three screening methods for the detection of the histologically-defined gold standard CIN-2 + was performed. Women were screened for cervical abnormalities with the Digene HC2 assay (HPV), Pap smear and VIA. VIA was performed by clinic nurses, digital photographs taken and then later reviewed by specialist physicians. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive valves for CIN-2 + were calculated using maximum likelihood estimators. RESULTS: 1,202 HIV-infected women participated, with a median age of 38 years and CD4 counts of 394 cells/mm(3). One third of women had a high grade lesion on cytology. VIA and HPV were positive in 45% and 61% of women respectively. Estimated sensitivity/specificity for HPV, Pap smear and VIA for CIN 2+ was 92%/51.4%, 75.8%/83.4% and 65.4/68.5% (nurse reading), respectively. Sensitivities were similar, and specificities appeared significantly lower for the HPV test, cytology and VIA among women with CD4 counts ≤200 cells/mm(3) as compared to CD4 counts >350 cells/mm(3). CONCLUSIONS: Although HPV was the most sensitive screening method for detecting CIN 2+, it was less specific than conventional cytology and VIA with digital imaging review. Screening programs may need to be individualized in context of the resources and capacity in each area. Public Library of Science 2013-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3543403/ /pubmed/23326441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053494 Text en © 2013 Firnhaber et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Firnhaber, Cynthia
Mayisela, Nomtha
Mao, Lu
Williams, Sophie
Swarts, Avril
Faesen, Mark
Levin, Simon
Michelow, Pam
Omar, Tanvier
Hudgens, Michael G.
Williamson, Anna-Lise
Allan, Bruce
Lewis, David A.
Smith, Jennifer S.
Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa
title Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa
title_full Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa
title_fullStr Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa
title_short Validation of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in HIV Positive Women from Johannesburg South Africa
title_sort validation of cervical cancer screening methods in hiv positive women from johannesburg south africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053494
work_keys_str_mv AT firnhabercynthia validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT mayiselanomtha validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT maolu validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT williamssophie validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT swartsavril validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT faesenmark validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT levinsimon validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT michelowpam validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT omartanvier validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT hudgensmichaelg validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT williamsonannalise validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT allanbruce validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT lewisdavida validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica
AT smithjennifers validationofcervicalcancerscreeningmethodsinhivpositivewomenfromjohannesburgsouthafrica