Cargando…

A comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells

BACKGROUND: Micronucleus (MN) represents small, additional nuclei formed by the exclusion of chromosome fragments or whole chromosomes lagging at mitosis. MN rates, therefore, indirectly reflect chromosome breakage or impairment of the mitotic apparatus. During the last few decades, micronuclei (“MN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grover, S, Mujib, ABR, Jahagirdar, A, Telagi, N, Kulkarni, PG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326025
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.103940
_version_ 1782255682818408448
author Grover, S
Mujib, ABR
Jahagirdar, A
Telagi, N
Kulkarni, PG
author_facet Grover, S
Mujib, ABR
Jahagirdar, A
Telagi, N
Kulkarni, PG
author_sort Grover, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Micronucleus (MN) represents small, additional nuclei formed by the exclusion of chromosome fragments or whole chromosomes lagging at mitosis. MN rates, therefore, indirectly reflect chromosome breakage or impairment of the mitotic apparatus. During the last few decades, micronuclei (“MNi”) in oral exfoliated epithelial cells are widely used as biomarkers of chromosomal damage, genome instability and cancer risk in humans. However, until now only little attention has been given to the effect of different staining procedures on the results of these MN assays. AIM: To compare the MNi frequencies in oral exfoliated epithelial cells using three different stains, i.e.,Feulgen stain, Papanicolaou stain (Pap) and hemotoxylin and eosin stain (H and E). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oral exfoliated cells from 45 cases of potentially malignant disorders (15 oral submucous fibrosis, 15 lichen planus and 15 leukoplakia) and 15 controls with healthy mucosa, were taken and MNi frequencies (No. of MNi/1000 cells) were compared using three different stains. RESULTS: Mean MNi frequency in cases was found to be 3.8 with Feulgen stain, 16.8 with PAP and 25.9 with H and E. In controls, mean MNi frequency was 1.6 with Feulgen stain, 7.7 with PAP and 9.6 with H and E stain. Statistically significant value (P < 0.01) were observed when the three stains were compared together using Kruskal Walli's ANOVA test. CONCLUSION: Feulgen being a DNA-specific stain gave the least counts, although statistically significant results from the comparison of MNi frequency between cases and controls were obtained with all the three stains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3543590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35435902013-01-16 A comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells Grover, S Mujib, ABR Jahagirdar, A Telagi, N Kulkarni, PG J Cytol Original Article BACKGROUND: Micronucleus (MN) represents small, additional nuclei formed by the exclusion of chromosome fragments or whole chromosomes lagging at mitosis. MN rates, therefore, indirectly reflect chromosome breakage or impairment of the mitotic apparatus. During the last few decades, micronuclei (“MNi”) in oral exfoliated epithelial cells are widely used as biomarkers of chromosomal damage, genome instability and cancer risk in humans. However, until now only little attention has been given to the effect of different staining procedures on the results of these MN assays. AIM: To compare the MNi frequencies in oral exfoliated epithelial cells using three different stains, i.e.,Feulgen stain, Papanicolaou stain (Pap) and hemotoxylin and eosin stain (H and E). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oral exfoliated cells from 45 cases of potentially malignant disorders (15 oral submucous fibrosis, 15 lichen planus and 15 leukoplakia) and 15 controls with healthy mucosa, were taken and MNi frequencies (No. of MNi/1000 cells) were compared using three different stains. RESULTS: Mean MNi frequency in cases was found to be 3.8 with Feulgen stain, 16.8 with PAP and 25.9 with H and E. In controls, mean MNi frequency was 1.6 with Feulgen stain, 7.7 with PAP and 9.6 with H and E stain. Statistically significant value (P < 0.01) were observed when the three stains were compared together using Kruskal Walli's ANOVA test. CONCLUSION: Feulgen being a DNA-specific stain gave the least counts, although statistically significant results from the comparison of MNi frequency between cases and controls were obtained with all the three stains. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3543590/ /pubmed/23326025 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.103940 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Cytology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Grover, S
Mujib, ABR
Jahagirdar, A
Telagi, N
Kulkarni, PG
A comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells
title A comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells
title_full A comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells
title_fullStr A comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells
title_short A comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells
title_sort comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326025
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.103940
work_keys_str_mv AT grovers acomparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells
AT mujibabr acomparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells
AT jahagirdara acomparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells
AT telagin acomparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells
AT kulkarnipg acomparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells
AT grovers comparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells
AT mujibabr comparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells
AT jahagirdara comparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells
AT telagin comparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells
AT kulkarnipg comparativestudyforselectivityofmicronucleiinoralexfoliatedepithelialcells