Cargando…

Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study

PURPOSE: Several parameters have been described for determining the success or failure of dental implants. The surface properties of transgingival implant components have had a great impact on the long-term success of dental implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the tendency of two peri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Greison Rabelo, Pozzer, Leandro, Cavalieri-Pereira, Lucas, de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson, Olate, Sergio, de Albergaría Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23346465
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2012.42.6.217
_version_ 1782255723487428608
author de Oliveira, Greison Rabelo
Pozzer, Leandro
Cavalieri-Pereira, Lucas
de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson
Olate, Sergio
de Albergaría Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
author_facet de Oliveira, Greison Rabelo
Pozzer, Leandro
Cavalieri-Pereira, Lucas
de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson
Olate, Sergio
de Albergaría Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
author_sort de Oliveira, Greison Rabelo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Several parameters have been described for determining the success or failure of dental implants. The surface properties of transgingival implant components have had a great impact on the long-term success of dental implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the tendency of two periodontal pathogens to adhere to and colonize zirconia abutments and titanium alloys both in hard surfaces and soft tissues. METHODS: Twelve patients participated in this study. Three months after implant placement, the abutments were connected. Five weeks following the abutment connections, the abutments were removed, probing depth measurements were recorded, and gingival biopsies were performed. The abutments and gingival biopsies taken from the buccal gingiva were analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction to compare the DNA copy numbers of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and total bacteria. The surface free energy of the abutments was calculated using the sessile water drop method before replacement. Data analyses used the Mann Whitney U-test, and P-values below 0.05 find statistical significance. RESULTS: The present study showed no statistically significant differences between the DNA copy numbers of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, and total bacteria for both the titanium and zirconia abutments and the biopsies taken from their buccal gingiva. The differences between the free surface energy of the abutments had no influence on the microbiological findings. CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia surfaces have comparable properties to titanium alloy surfaces and may be suitable and safe materials for the long-term success of dental implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3543937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35439372013-01-23 Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study de Oliveira, Greison Rabelo Pozzer, Leandro Cavalieri-Pereira, Lucas de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson Olate, Sergio de Albergaría Barbosa, Jose Ricardo J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: Several parameters have been described for determining the success or failure of dental implants. The surface properties of transgingival implant components have had a great impact on the long-term success of dental implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the tendency of two periodontal pathogens to adhere to and colonize zirconia abutments and titanium alloys both in hard surfaces and soft tissues. METHODS: Twelve patients participated in this study. Three months after implant placement, the abutments were connected. Five weeks following the abutment connections, the abutments were removed, probing depth measurements were recorded, and gingival biopsies were performed. The abutments and gingival biopsies taken from the buccal gingiva were analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction to compare the DNA copy numbers of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and total bacteria. The surface free energy of the abutments was calculated using the sessile water drop method before replacement. Data analyses used the Mann Whitney U-test, and P-values below 0.05 find statistical significance. RESULTS: The present study showed no statistically significant differences between the DNA copy numbers of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, and total bacteria for both the titanium and zirconia abutments and the biopsies taken from their buccal gingiva. The differences between the free surface energy of the abutments had no influence on the microbiological findings. CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia surfaces have comparable properties to titanium alloy surfaces and may be suitable and safe materials for the long-term success of dental implants. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2012-12 2012-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3543937/ /pubmed/23346465 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2012.42.6.217 Text en Copyright © 2012 Korean Academy of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
de Oliveira, Greison Rabelo
Pozzer, Leandro
Cavalieri-Pereira, Lucas
de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson
Olate, Sergio
de Albergaría Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study
title Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study
title_full Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study
title_fullStr Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study
title_short Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study
title_sort bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23346465
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2012.42.6.217
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveiragreisonrabelo bacterialadhesionandcolonizationdifferencesbetweenzirconiaandtitaniumimplantabutmentsaninvivohumanstudy
AT pozzerleandro bacterialadhesionandcolonizationdifferencesbetweenzirconiaandtitaniumimplantabutmentsaninvivohumanstudy
AT cavalieripereiralucas bacterialadhesionandcolonizationdifferencesbetweenzirconiaandtitaniumimplantabutmentsaninvivohumanstudy
AT demoraespaulohemerson bacterialadhesionandcolonizationdifferencesbetweenzirconiaandtitaniumimplantabutmentsaninvivohumanstudy
AT olatesergio bacterialadhesionandcolonizationdifferencesbetweenzirconiaandtitaniumimplantabutmentsaninvivohumanstudy
AT dealbergariabarbosajosericardo bacterialadhesionandcolonizationdifferencesbetweenzirconiaandtitaniumimplantabutmentsaninvivohumanstudy