Cargando…

Salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reactions diseases

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the level of salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid reactions (OLR) patients as diagnostic factors to the differential diagnosis of OLP, OLR diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saliva sample were obtained from 50 OLP, 50...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghaleyani, Parichehr, Sardari, Farimah, Akbari, Mojtaba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326803
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.102977
_version_ 1782255746395668480
author Ghaleyani, Parichehr
Sardari, Farimah
Akbari, Mojtaba
author_facet Ghaleyani, Parichehr
Sardari, Farimah
Akbari, Mojtaba
author_sort Ghaleyani, Parichehr
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the level of salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid reactions (OLR) patients as diagnostic factors to the differential diagnosis of OLP, OLR diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saliva sample were obtained from 50 OLP, 50 OLR patients and 50 healthy subjects between April 2010 and October 2011. The clinical relevant data taken into account were: Demographical data, previous medication, and level of salivary IgA and IgG. Each sample was assessed to determine the level of salivary IgA by ELISA test and salivary IgG by radial immune diffusion. RESULTS: The mean of salivary IgA and IgG in patients were 119.01 ± 114.18 mic/ml and 3.25 ± 1.81 mic/ml, respectively. There were no significant differences for salivary IgA and IgG between OLP and OLR, but the mean of salivary IgA and IgG in OLP and OLR patients were significantly more than normal group (P-value < 0.05). The cut-off value was set at >72 mic/ml for salivary IgA in both OLP and OLR groups and set at >3.7 mic/ml for salivary IgG. On comparing the AUCs, there was no significant difference between AUCs for IgA (0.715 ± 0.05vs. 0.69 ± 0.5, for OLP and OLR patients, respectively,P-value = 0.7) and IgG (0.681 ± 0.05 vs. 0.548 ± 0.06, for OLP and OLR patients, respectively, P-value = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the level of salivary IgA and IgG in OLP and OLR patients is higher than healthy controls, but they cannot be used as diagnostic factors to the differential diagnosis of OLP and OLR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3544108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35441082013-01-16 Salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reactions diseases Ghaleyani, Parichehr Sardari, Farimah Akbari, Mojtaba Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the level of salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid reactions (OLR) patients as diagnostic factors to the differential diagnosis of OLP, OLR diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saliva sample were obtained from 50 OLP, 50 OLR patients and 50 healthy subjects between April 2010 and October 2011. The clinical relevant data taken into account were: Demographical data, previous medication, and level of salivary IgA and IgG. Each sample was assessed to determine the level of salivary IgA by ELISA test and salivary IgG by radial immune diffusion. RESULTS: The mean of salivary IgA and IgG in patients were 119.01 ± 114.18 mic/ml and 3.25 ± 1.81 mic/ml, respectively. There were no significant differences for salivary IgA and IgG between OLP and OLR, but the mean of salivary IgA and IgG in OLP and OLR patients were significantly more than normal group (P-value < 0.05). The cut-off value was set at >72 mic/ml for salivary IgA in both OLP and OLR groups and set at >3.7 mic/ml for salivary IgG. On comparing the AUCs, there was no significant difference between AUCs for IgA (0.715 ± 0.05vs. 0.69 ± 0.5, for OLP and OLR patients, respectively,P-value = 0.7) and IgG (0.681 ± 0.05 vs. 0.548 ± 0.06, for OLP and OLR patients, respectively, P-value = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the level of salivary IgA and IgG in OLP and OLR patients is higher than healthy controls, but they cannot be used as diagnostic factors to the differential diagnosis of OLP and OLR. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3544108/ /pubmed/23326803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.102977 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Ghaleyani http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghaleyani, Parichehr
Sardari, Farimah
Akbari, Mojtaba
Salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reactions diseases
title Salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reactions diseases
title_full Salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reactions diseases
title_fullStr Salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reactions diseases
title_full_unstemmed Salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reactions diseases
title_short Salivary IgA and IgG in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reactions diseases
title_sort salivary iga and igg in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid reactions diseases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326803
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.102977
work_keys_str_mv AT ghaleyaniparichehr salivaryigaandigginorallichenplanusandorallichenoidreactionsdiseases
AT sardarifarimah salivaryigaandigginorallichenplanusandorallichenoidreactionsdiseases
AT akbarimojtaba salivaryigaandigginorallichenplanusandorallichenoidreactionsdiseases