Cargando…

Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi)-LASIK using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ocular response analyzer corneal c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shousha, Shireen MA, Abo Steit, Mahmoud AH, Hosny, Mohamed HM, Ewais, Wael A, Shalaby, Ahmad MM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326186
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S37978
_version_ 1782255774636965888
author Shousha, Shireen MA
Abo Steit, Mahmoud AH
Hosny, Mohamed HM
Ewais, Wael A
Shalaby, Ahmad MM
author_facet Shousha, Shireen MA
Abo Steit, Mahmoud AH
Hosny, Mohamed HM
Ewais, Wael A
Shalaby, Ahmad MM
author_sort Shousha, Shireen MA
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi)-LASIK using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ocular response analyzer corneal compensated IOP (ORA IOPcc) and Pentacam corrected IOP. METHODS: A prospective comparative clinical study was conducted between February and September 2011 on 30 eyes divided into four groups, i.e. 20 corneas of 10 patients before LASIK (group A), 20 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group B), 10 corneas of five patients before Epi-LASIK (group C), and 10 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group D). Patient age ranged from 20 to 50 years. IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry, ORA corneal compensation, and Pentacam correction (which also measured central corneal thickness). RESULTS: Significant positive linear correlations were found between IOP values measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and other techniques, and with preoperative pachymetry in group A. The correlation between preoperative Pentacam-corrected and preoperative ORA corneal-compensated IOP was strongest for Goldmann applanation tonometry (r = 0.97 and r = 0.858 respectively, P < 0.001). Compared with preoperative values, postoperative IOP measured by the four methods were significantly lower. The difference was statistically significant when IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry compared with the ORA and Pentacam methods (P < 0.001 for LASIK patients and P = 0.017 for Epi-LASIK patients). Nonsignificant correlations were found between the degree of lowering of postoperative IOP and postoperative pachymetry in groups B and D. CONCLUSION: Refractive surgery causes significant lowering of IOP as measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ORA compensation, and Pentacam correction. LASIK has a greater effect than Epi-LASIK on IOP measurement error following refractive surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3544333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35443332013-01-16 Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery Shousha, Shireen MA Abo Steit, Mahmoud AH Hosny, Mohamed HM Ewais, Wael A Shalaby, Ahmad MM Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi)-LASIK using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ocular response analyzer corneal compensated IOP (ORA IOPcc) and Pentacam corrected IOP. METHODS: A prospective comparative clinical study was conducted between February and September 2011 on 30 eyes divided into four groups, i.e. 20 corneas of 10 patients before LASIK (group A), 20 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group B), 10 corneas of five patients before Epi-LASIK (group C), and 10 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group D). Patient age ranged from 20 to 50 years. IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry, ORA corneal compensation, and Pentacam correction (which also measured central corneal thickness). RESULTS: Significant positive linear correlations were found between IOP values measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and other techniques, and with preoperative pachymetry in group A. The correlation between preoperative Pentacam-corrected and preoperative ORA corneal-compensated IOP was strongest for Goldmann applanation tonometry (r = 0.97 and r = 0.858 respectively, P < 0.001). Compared with preoperative values, postoperative IOP measured by the four methods were significantly lower. The difference was statistically significant when IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry compared with the ORA and Pentacam methods (P < 0.001 for LASIK patients and P = 0.017 for Epi-LASIK patients). Nonsignificant correlations were found between the degree of lowering of postoperative IOP and postoperative pachymetry in groups B and D. CONCLUSION: Refractive surgery causes significant lowering of IOP as measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ORA compensation, and Pentacam correction. LASIK has a greater effect than Epi-LASIK on IOP measurement error following refractive surgery. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3544333/ /pubmed/23326186 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S37978 Text en © 2013 Shousha et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shousha, Shireen MA
Abo Steit, Mahmoud AH
Hosny, Mohamed HM
Ewais, Wael A
Shalaby, Ahmad MM
Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery
title Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery
title_full Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery
title_short Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery
title_sort comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326186
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S37978
work_keys_str_mv AT shoushashireenma comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery
AT abosteitmahmoudah comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery
AT hosnymohamedhm comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery
AT ewaiswaela comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery
AT shalabyahmadmm comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery