Cargando…
Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi)-LASIK using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ocular response analyzer corneal c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326186 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S37978 |
_version_ | 1782255774636965888 |
---|---|
author | Shousha, Shireen MA Abo Steit, Mahmoud AH Hosny, Mohamed HM Ewais, Wael A Shalaby, Ahmad MM |
author_facet | Shousha, Shireen MA Abo Steit, Mahmoud AH Hosny, Mohamed HM Ewais, Wael A Shalaby, Ahmad MM |
author_sort | Shousha, Shireen MA |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi)-LASIK using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ocular response analyzer corneal compensated IOP (ORA IOPcc) and Pentacam corrected IOP. METHODS: A prospective comparative clinical study was conducted between February and September 2011 on 30 eyes divided into four groups, i.e. 20 corneas of 10 patients before LASIK (group A), 20 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group B), 10 corneas of five patients before Epi-LASIK (group C), and 10 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group D). Patient age ranged from 20 to 50 years. IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry, ORA corneal compensation, and Pentacam correction (which also measured central corneal thickness). RESULTS: Significant positive linear correlations were found between IOP values measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and other techniques, and with preoperative pachymetry in group A. The correlation between preoperative Pentacam-corrected and preoperative ORA corneal-compensated IOP was strongest for Goldmann applanation tonometry (r = 0.97 and r = 0.858 respectively, P < 0.001). Compared with preoperative values, postoperative IOP measured by the four methods were significantly lower. The difference was statistically significant when IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry compared with the ORA and Pentacam methods (P < 0.001 for LASIK patients and P = 0.017 for Epi-LASIK patients). Nonsignificant correlations were found between the degree of lowering of postoperative IOP and postoperative pachymetry in groups B and D. CONCLUSION: Refractive surgery causes significant lowering of IOP as measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ORA compensation, and Pentacam correction. LASIK has a greater effect than Epi-LASIK on IOP measurement error following refractive surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3544333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35443332013-01-16 Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery Shousha, Shireen MA Abo Steit, Mahmoud AH Hosny, Mohamed HM Ewais, Wael A Shalaby, Ahmad MM Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi)-LASIK using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ocular response analyzer corneal compensated IOP (ORA IOPcc) and Pentacam corrected IOP. METHODS: A prospective comparative clinical study was conducted between February and September 2011 on 30 eyes divided into four groups, i.e. 20 corneas of 10 patients before LASIK (group A), 20 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group B), 10 corneas of five patients before Epi-LASIK (group C), and 10 corneas of the same patients 2 months postoperatively (group D). Patient age ranged from 20 to 50 years. IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry, ORA corneal compensation, and Pentacam correction (which also measured central corneal thickness). RESULTS: Significant positive linear correlations were found between IOP values measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and other techniques, and with preoperative pachymetry in group A. The correlation between preoperative Pentacam-corrected and preoperative ORA corneal-compensated IOP was strongest for Goldmann applanation tonometry (r = 0.97 and r = 0.858 respectively, P < 0.001). Compared with preoperative values, postoperative IOP measured by the four methods were significantly lower. The difference was statistically significant when IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation and air puff tonometry compared with the ORA and Pentacam methods (P < 0.001 for LASIK patients and P = 0.017 for Epi-LASIK patients). Nonsignificant correlations were found between the degree of lowering of postoperative IOP and postoperative pachymetry in groups B and D. CONCLUSION: Refractive surgery causes significant lowering of IOP as measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry, air puff tonometry, ORA compensation, and Pentacam correction. LASIK has a greater effect than Epi-LASIK on IOP measurement error following refractive surgery. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3544333/ /pubmed/23326186 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S37978 Text en © 2013 Shousha et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Shousha, Shireen MA Abo Steit, Mahmoud AH Hosny, Mohamed HM Ewais, Wael A Shalaby, Ahmad MM Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery |
title | Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery |
title_full | Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery |
title_fullStr | Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery |
title_short | Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery |
title_sort | comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326186 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S37978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shoushashireenma comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery AT abosteitmahmoudah comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery AT hosnymohamedhm comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery AT ewaiswaela comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery AT shalabyahmadmm comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyespostsurfaceandpostlamellarrefractivesurgery |