Cargando…
Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: In searches for clinical trials and systematic reviews, it is said that Google Scholar (GS) should never be used in isolation, but in addition to PubMed, Cochrane, and other trusted sources of information. We therefore performed a study to assess the coverage of GS specifically for the s...
Autores principales: | Gehanno, Jean-François, Rollin, Laetitia, Darmoni, Stefan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic
reviews
por: Giustini, Dean, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals
por: Gehanno, Jean-Francois, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
How are the different specialties represented in the major journals in general medicine?
por: Gehanno, Jean-Francois, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough
por: Boeker, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Performance evaluation of unified medical language system(®)'s synonyms expansion to query PubMed
por: Griffon, Nicolas, et al.
Publicado: (2012)