Cargando…
Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of malaria is an essential prerequisite for proper treatment and drug resistance monitoring. Microscopy is considered the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but has limitations. ELISA, PCR, and Real Time PCR are also used to diagnose malaria in reference laboratories,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-415 |
_version_ | 1782255802571030528 |
---|---|
author | Mohon, Abu Naser Elahi, Rubayet Podder, Milka Patracia Mohiuddin, Khaja Hossain, Mohammad Sharif Khan, Wasif A Haque, Rashidul Alam, Mohammad Shafiul |
author_facet | Mohon, Abu Naser Elahi, Rubayet Podder, Milka Patracia Mohiuddin, Khaja Hossain, Mohammad Sharif Khan, Wasif A Haque, Rashidul Alam, Mohammad Shafiul |
author_sort | Mohon, Abu Naser |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of malaria is an essential prerequisite for proper treatment and drug resistance monitoring. Microscopy is considered the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but has limitations. ELISA, PCR, and Real Time PCR are also used to diagnose malaria in reference laboratories, although their application at the field level is currently not feasible. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) however, have been brought into field operation and widely adopted in recent days. This study evaluates OnSite (Pf/Pan) antigen test, a new RDT introduced by CTK Biotech Inc, USA for malaria diagnosis in a reference setting. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from febrile patients referred for malaria diagnosis by clinicians. Subjects were included in this study from two different Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs) situated in two malaria endemic districts of Bangladesh. Microscopy and nested PCR were considered the gold standard in this study. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was performed on preserved whole blood samples. RESULTS: In total, 372 febrile subjects were included in this study. Of these subjects, 229 (61.6%) tested positive for Plasmodium infection detected by microscopy and nested PCR. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was 94.2% sensitive (95% CI, 89.3-97.3) and 99.5% specific (95% CI, 97.4-00.0) for Plasmodium falciparum diagnosis and 97.3% sensitive (95% CI, 90.5-99.7) and 98.7% specific (95% CI, 96.6-99.6) for Plasmodium vivax diagnosis. Sensitivity varied with differential parasite count for both P. falciparum and P. vivax. The highest sensitivity was observed in febrile patients with parasitaemia that ranged from 501–1,000 parasites/μL regardless of the Plasmodium species. CONCLUSION: The new OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT is both sensitive and specific for symptomatic malaria diagnosis in standard laboratory conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3544592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35445922013-01-16 Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria Mohon, Abu Naser Elahi, Rubayet Podder, Milka Patracia Mohiuddin, Khaja Hossain, Mohammad Sharif Khan, Wasif A Haque, Rashidul Alam, Mohammad Shafiul Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of malaria is an essential prerequisite for proper treatment and drug resistance monitoring. Microscopy is considered the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but has limitations. ELISA, PCR, and Real Time PCR are also used to diagnose malaria in reference laboratories, although their application at the field level is currently not feasible. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) however, have been brought into field operation and widely adopted in recent days. This study evaluates OnSite (Pf/Pan) antigen test, a new RDT introduced by CTK Biotech Inc, USA for malaria diagnosis in a reference setting. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from febrile patients referred for malaria diagnosis by clinicians. Subjects were included in this study from two different Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs) situated in two malaria endemic districts of Bangladesh. Microscopy and nested PCR were considered the gold standard in this study. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was performed on preserved whole blood samples. RESULTS: In total, 372 febrile subjects were included in this study. Of these subjects, 229 (61.6%) tested positive for Plasmodium infection detected by microscopy and nested PCR. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was 94.2% sensitive (95% CI, 89.3-97.3) and 99.5% specific (95% CI, 97.4-00.0) for Plasmodium falciparum diagnosis and 97.3% sensitive (95% CI, 90.5-99.7) and 98.7% specific (95% CI, 96.6-99.6) for Plasmodium vivax diagnosis. Sensitivity varied with differential parasite count for both P. falciparum and P. vivax. The highest sensitivity was observed in febrile patients with parasitaemia that ranged from 501–1,000 parasites/μL regardless of the Plasmodium species. CONCLUSION: The new OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT is both sensitive and specific for symptomatic malaria diagnosis in standard laboratory conditions. BioMed Central 2012-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3544592/ /pubmed/23234579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-415 Text en Copyright ©2012 Mohon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Mohon, Abu Naser Elahi, Rubayet Podder, Milka Patracia Mohiuddin, Khaja Hossain, Mohammad Sharif Khan, Wasif A Haque, Rashidul Alam, Mohammad Shafiul Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria |
title | Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria |
title_full | Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria |
title_short | Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria |
title_sort | evaluation of the onsite (pf/pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-415 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohonabunaser evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria AT elahirubayet evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria AT poddermilkapatracia evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria AT mohiuddinkhaja evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria AT hossainmohammadsharif evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria AT khanwasifa evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria AT haquerashidul evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria AT alammohammadshafiul evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria |