Cargando…

Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of malaria is an essential prerequisite for proper treatment and drug resistance monitoring. Microscopy is considered the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but has limitations. ELISA, PCR, and Real Time PCR are also used to diagnose malaria in reference laboratories,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohon, Abu Naser, Elahi, Rubayet, Podder, Milka Patracia, Mohiuddin, Khaja, Hossain, Mohammad Sharif, Khan, Wasif A, Haque, Rashidul, Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-415
_version_ 1782255802571030528
author Mohon, Abu Naser
Elahi, Rubayet
Podder, Milka Patracia
Mohiuddin, Khaja
Hossain, Mohammad Sharif
Khan, Wasif A
Haque, Rashidul
Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
author_facet Mohon, Abu Naser
Elahi, Rubayet
Podder, Milka Patracia
Mohiuddin, Khaja
Hossain, Mohammad Sharif
Khan, Wasif A
Haque, Rashidul
Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
author_sort Mohon, Abu Naser
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of malaria is an essential prerequisite for proper treatment and drug resistance monitoring. Microscopy is considered the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but has limitations. ELISA, PCR, and Real Time PCR are also used to diagnose malaria in reference laboratories, although their application at the field level is currently not feasible. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) however, have been brought into field operation and widely adopted in recent days. This study evaluates OnSite (Pf/Pan) antigen test, a new RDT introduced by CTK Biotech Inc, USA for malaria diagnosis in a reference setting. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from febrile patients referred for malaria diagnosis by clinicians. Subjects were included in this study from two different Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs) situated in two malaria endemic districts of Bangladesh. Microscopy and nested PCR were considered the gold standard in this study. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was performed on preserved whole blood samples. RESULTS: In total, 372 febrile subjects were included in this study. Of these subjects, 229 (61.6%) tested positive for Plasmodium infection detected by microscopy and nested PCR. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was 94.2% sensitive (95% CI, 89.3-97.3) and 99.5% specific (95% CI, 97.4-00.0) for Plasmodium falciparum diagnosis and 97.3% sensitive (95% CI, 90.5-99.7) and 98.7% specific (95% CI, 96.6-99.6) for Plasmodium vivax diagnosis. Sensitivity varied with differential parasite count for both P. falciparum and P. vivax. The highest sensitivity was observed in febrile patients with parasitaemia that ranged from 501–1,000 parasites/μL regardless of the Plasmodium species. CONCLUSION: The new OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT is both sensitive and specific for symptomatic malaria diagnosis in standard laboratory conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3544592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35445922013-01-16 Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria Mohon, Abu Naser Elahi, Rubayet Podder, Milka Patracia Mohiuddin, Khaja Hossain, Mohammad Sharif Khan, Wasif A Haque, Rashidul Alam, Mohammad Shafiul Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of malaria is an essential prerequisite for proper treatment and drug resistance monitoring. Microscopy is considered the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but has limitations. ELISA, PCR, and Real Time PCR are also used to diagnose malaria in reference laboratories, although their application at the field level is currently not feasible. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) however, have been brought into field operation and widely adopted in recent days. This study evaluates OnSite (Pf/Pan) antigen test, a new RDT introduced by CTK Biotech Inc, USA for malaria diagnosis in a reference setting. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from febrile patients referred for malaria diagnosis by clinicians. Subjects were included in this study from two different Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs) situated in two malaria endemic districts of Bangladesh. Microscopy and nested PCR were considered the gold standard in this study. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was performed on preserved whole blood samples. RESULTS: In total, 372 febrile subjects were included in this study. Of these subjects, 229 (61.6%) tested positive for Plasmodium infection detected by microscopy and nested PCR. OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT was 94.2% sensitive (95% CI, 89.3-97.3) and 99.5% specific (95% CI, 97.4-00.0) for Plasmodium falciparum diagnosis and 97.3% sensitive (95% CI, 90.5-99.7) and 98.7% specific (95% CI, 96.6-99.6) for Plasmodium vivax diagnosis. Sensitivity varied with differential parasite count for both P. falciparum and P. vivax. The highest sensitivity was observed in febrile patients with parasitaemia that ranged from 501–1,000 parasites/μL regardless of the Plasmodium species. CONCLUSION: The new OnSite (Pf/Pan) RDT is both sensitive and specific for symptomatic malaria diagnosis in standard laboratory conditions. BioMed Central 2012-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3544592/ /pubmed/23234579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-415 Text en Copyright ©2012 Mohon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mohon, Abu Naser
Elahi, Rubayet
Podder, Milka Patracia
Mohiuddin, Khaja
Hossain, Mohammad Sharif
Khan, Wasif A
Haque, Rashidul
Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
title Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
title_full Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
title_fullStr Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
title_short Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
title_sort evaluation of the onsite (pf/pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-415
work_keys_str_mv AT mohonabunaser evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria
AT elahirubayet evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria
AT poddermilkapatracia evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria
AT mohiuddinkhaja evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria
AT hossainmohammadsharif evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria
AT khanwasifa evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria
AT haquerashidul evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria
AT alammohammadshafiul evaluationoftheonsitepfpanrapiddiagnostictestfordiagnosisofclinicalmalaria