Cargando…
Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods
BACKGROUND: The WHO estimates that 13% of maternal mortality is due to unsafe abortion, but challenges with measurement and data quality persist. To our knowledge, no systematic assessment of the validity of studies reporting estimates of abortion-related mortality exists. STUDY DESIGN: To be includ...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23341939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053346 |
_version_ | 1782255847845396480 |
---|---|
author | Gerdts, Caitlin Vohra, Divya Ahern, Jennifer |
author_facet | Gerdts, Caitlin Vohra, Divya Ahern, Jennifer |
author_sort | Gerdts, Caitlin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The WHO estimates that 13% of maternal mortality is due to unsafe abortion, but challenges with measurement and data quality persist. To our knowledge, no systematic assessment of the validity of studies reporting estimates of abortion-related mortality exists. STUDY DESIGN: To be included in this study, articles had to meet the following criteria: (1) published between September 1(st), 2000-December 1(st), 2011; (2) utilized data from a country where abortion is “considered unsafe”; (3) specified and enumerated causes of maternal death including “abortion”; (4) enumerated ≥100 maternal deaths; (5) a quantitative research study; (6) published in a peer-reviewed journal. RESULTS: 7,438 articles were initially identified. Thirty-six studies were ultimately included. Overall, studies rated “Very Good” found the highest estimates of abortion related mortality (median 16%, range 1–27.4%). Studies rated “Very Poor” found the lowest overall proportion of abortion related deaths (median: 2%, range 1.3–9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in the quality of data collection would facilitate better understanding global abortion-related mortality. Until improved data exist, better reporting of study procedures and standardization of the definition of abortion and abortion-related mortality should be encouraged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3544771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35447712013-01-22 Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods Gerdts, Caitlin Vohra, Divya Ahern, Jennifer PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The WHO estimates that 13% of maternal mortality is due to unsafe abortion, but challenges with measurement and data quality persist. To our knowledge, no systematic assessment of the validity of studies reporting estimates of abortion-related mortality exists. STUDY DESIGN: To be included in this study, articles had to meet the following criteria: (1) published between September 1(st), 2000-December 1(st), 2011; (2) utilized data from a country where abortion is “considered unsafe”; (3) specified and enumerated causes of maternal death including “abortion”; (4) enumerated ≥100 maternal deaths; (5) a quantitative research study; (6) published in a peer-reviewed journal. RESULTS: 7,438 articles were initially identified. Thirty-six studies were ultimately included. Overall, studies rated “Very Good” found the highest estimates of abortion related mortality (median 16%, range 1–27.4%). Studies rated “Very Poor” found the lowest overall proportion of abortion related deaths (median: 2%, range 1.3–9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in the quality of data collection would facilitate better understanding global abortion-related mortality. Until improved data exist, better reporting of study procedures and standardization of the definition of abortion and abortion-related mortality should be encouraged. Public Library of Science 2013-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3544771/ /pubmed/23341939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053346 Text en © 2013 Gerdts et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gerdts, Caitlin Vohra, Divya Ahern, Jennifer Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods |
title | Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods |
title_full | Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods |
title_fullStr | Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods |
title_short | Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods |
title_sort | measuring unsafe abortion-related mortality: a systematic review of the existing methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23341939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerdtscaitlin measuringunsafeabortionrelatedmortalityasystematicreviewoftheexistingmethods AT vohradivya measuringunsafeabortionrelatedmortalityasystematicreviewoftheexistingmethods AT ahernjennifer measuringunsafeabortionrelatedmortalityasystematicreviewoftheexistingmethods |