Cargando…

Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods

BACKGROUND: The WHO estimates that 13% of maternal mortality is due to unsafe abortion, but challenges with measurement and data quality persist. To our knowledge, no systematic assessment of the validity of studies reporting estimates of abortion-related mortality exists. STUDY DESIGN: To be includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerdts, Caitlin, Vohra, Divya, Ahern, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23341939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053346
_version_ 1782255847845396480
author Gerdts, Caitlin
Vohra, Divya
Ahern, Jennifer
author_facet Gerdts, Caitlin
Vohra, Divya
Ahern, Jennifer
author_sort Gerdts, Caitlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The WHO estimates that 13% of maternal mortality is due to unsafe abortion, but challenges with measurement and data quality persist. To our knowledge, no systematic assessment of the validity of studies reporting estimates of abortion-related mortality exists. STUDY DESIGN: To be included in this study, articles had to meet the following criteria: (1) published between September 1(st), 2000-December 1(st), 2011; (2) utilized data from a country where abortion is “considered unsafe”; (3) specified and enumerated causes of maternal death including “abortion”; (4) enumerated ≥100 maternal deaths; (5) a quantitative research study; (6) published in a peer-reviewed journal. RESULTS: 7,438 articles were initially identified. Thirty-six studies were ultimately included. Overall, studies rated “Very Good” found the highest estimates of abortion related mortality (median 16%, range 1–27.4%). Studies rated “Very Poor” found the lowest overall proportion of abortion related deaths (median: 2%, range 1.3–9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in the quality of data collection would facilitate better understanding global abortion-related mortality. Until improved data exist, better reporting of study procedures and standardization of the definition of abortion and abortion-related mortality should be encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3544771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35447712013-01-22 Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods Gerdts, Caitlin Vohra, Divya Ahern, Jennifer PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The WHO estimates that 13% of maternal mortality is due to unsafe abortion, but challenges with measurement and data quality persist. To our knowledge, no systematic assessment of the validity of studies reporting estimates of abortion-related mortality exists. STUDY DESIGN: To be included in this study, articles had to meet the following criteria: (1) published between September 1(st), 2000-December 1(st), 2011; (2) utilized data from a country where abortion is “considered unsafe”; (3) specified and enumerated causes of maternal death including “abortion”; (4) enumerated ≥100 maternal deaths; (5) a quantitative research study; (6) published in a peer-reviewed journal. RESULTS: 7,438 articles were initially identified. Thirty-six studies were ultimately included. Overall, studies rated “Very Good” found the highest estimates of abortion related mortality (median 16%, range 1–27.4%). Studies rated “Very Poor” found the lowest overall proportion of abortion related deaths (median: 2%, range 1.3–9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in the quality of data collection would facilitate better understanding global abortion-related mortality. Until improved data exist, better reporting of study procedures and standardization of the definition of abortion and abortion-related mortality should be encouraged. Public Library of Science 2013-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3544771/ /pubmed/23341939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053346 Text en © 2013 Gerdts et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gerdts, Caitlin
Vohra, Divya
Ahern, Jennifer
Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods
title Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods
title_full Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods
title_fullStr Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods
title_short Measuring Unsafe Abortion-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review of the Existing Methods
title_sort measuring unsafe abortion-related mortality: a systematic review of the existing methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3544771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23341939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053346
work_keys_str_mv AT gerdtscaitlin measuringunsafeabortionrelatedmortalityasystematicreviewoftheexistingmethods
AT vohradivya measuringunsafeabortionrelatedmortalityasystematicreviewoftheexistingmethods
AT ahernjennifer measuringunsafeabortionrelatedmortalityasystematicreviewoftheexistingmethods