Cargando…
Effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (FEE)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia
BACKGROUND: Electric stimulation (ES) has been recognized as an effective method to improve motor function to paralysed patients with stroke. It is important for ES to synchronize with voluntary movement. To enhance this co-ordination, the finger-equipped electrode (FEE) was developed. The purpose o...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa UK, Ltd.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3545545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23252442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.729283 |
_version_ | 1782255914567335936 |
---|---|
author | Inobe, Jun-ichi Kato, Takashi |
author_facet | Inobe, Jun-ichi Kato, Takashi |
author_sort | Inobe, Jun-ichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electric stimulation (ES) has been recognized as an effective method to improve motor function to paralysed patients with stroke. It is important for ES to synchronize with voluntary movement. To enhance this co-ordination, the finger-equipped electrode (FEE) was developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate FEE in improving motor function of upper extremities (UEs) in patients with chronic stroke. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: The study participants included four patients with chronic stroke who received FEE electronic stimulation (FEE-ES) plus passive and active training and three control patients who underwent training without FEE-ES. The patients were treated five times weekly for 4 weeks. UE motor function was evaluated before and after treatment using Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Brunnstrom recovery staging. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in each group was 60-years and there was a mean of 49 months since the onset of symptoms. All patients had severe UE weakness. The patients receiving FEE-ES had greater improvement in UE function than control patients (total, proximal and distal FMA, p < 0.05; Brunnstrom staging of UE, p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: The results indicate that FEE-ES may be an effective treatment for patients with chronic stroke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3545545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Informa UK, Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35455452013-01-16 Effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (FEE)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia Inobe, Jun-ichi Kato, Takashi Brain Inj Original Article BACKGROUND: Electric stimulation (ES) has been recognized as an effective method to improve motor function to paralysed patients with stroke. It is important for ES to synchronize with voluntary movement. To enhance this co-ordination, the finger-equipped electrode (FEE) was developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate FEE in improving motor function of upper extremities (UEs) in patients with chronic stroke. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: The study participants included four patients with chronic stroke who received FEE electronic stimulation (FEE-ES) plus passive and active training and three control patients who underwent training without FEE-ES. The patients were treated five times weekly for 4 weeks. UE motor function was evaluated before and after treatment using Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Brunnstrom recovery staging. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in each group was 60-years and there was a mean of 49 months since the onset of symptoms. All patients had severe UE weakness. The patients receiving FEE-ES had greater improvement in UE function than control patients (total, proximal and distal FMA, p < 0.05; Brunnstrom staging of UE, p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: The results indicate that FEE-ES may be an effective treatment for patients with chronic stroke. Informa UK, Ltd. 2013-01 2012-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3545545/ /pubmed/23252442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.729283 Text en © 2013 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Inobe, Jun-ichi Kato, Takashi Effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (FEE)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia |
title | Effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (FEE)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia |
title_full | Effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (FEE)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (FEE)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (FEE)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia |
title_short | Effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (FEE)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia |
title_sort | effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (fee)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3545545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23252442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.729283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inobejunichi effectivenessoffingerequippedelectrodefeetriggeredelectricalstimulationimprovingchronicstrokepatientswithseverehemiplegia AT katotakashi effectivenessoffingerequippedelectrodefeetriggeredelectricalstimulationimprovingchronicstrokepatientswithseverehemiplegia |