Cargando…

The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden

BACKGROUND: This paper presents the model and results to evaluate the use of teriparatide as a first-line treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). The study’s objective was to determine if teriparatide is cost effective against oral bispho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Daniel R, Smolen, Lee J, Klein, Timothy M, Klein, Robert W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3545974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-213
_version_ 1782255972883890176
author Murphy, Daniel R
Smolen, Lee J
Klein, Timothy M
Klein, Robert W
author_facet Murphy, Daniel R
Smolen, Lee J
Klein, Timothy M
Klein, Robert W
author_sort Murphy, Daniel R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper presents the model and results to evaluate the use of teriparatide as a first-line treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). The study’s objective was to determine if teriparatide is cost effective against oral bisphosphonates for two large and high risk cohorts. METHODS: A computer simulation model was created to model treatment, osteoporosis related fractures, and the remaining life of PMO and GIOP patients. Natural mortality and additional mortality from osteoporosis related fractures were included in the model. Costs for treatment with both teriparatide and oral bisphosphonates were included. Drug efficacy was modeled as a reduction to the relative fracture risk for subsequent osteoporosis related fractures. Patient health utilities associated with age, gender, and osteoporosis related fractures were included in the model. Patient costs and utilities were summarized and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for teriparatide versus oral bisphosphonates and teriparatide versus no treatment were estimated. For each of the PMO and GIOP populations, two cohorts differentiated by fracture history were simulated. The first contained patients with both a historical vertebral fracture and an incident vertebral fracture. The second contained patients with only an incident vertebral fracture. The PMO cohorts simulated had an initial Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score of −3.0. The GIOP cohorts simulated had an initial BMD T-Score of −2.5. RESULTS: The ICERs for teriparatide versus bisphosphonate use for the one and two fracture PMO cohorts were €36,995 per QALY and €19,371 per QALY. The ICERs for teriparatide versus bisphosphonate use for the one and two fracture GIOP cohorts were €20,826 per QALY and €15,155 per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The selection of teriparatide versus oral bisphosphonates as a first-line treatment for the high risk PMO and GIOP cohorts evaluated is justified at a cost per QALY threshold of €50,000.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3545974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35459742013-01-17 The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden Murphy, Daniel R Smolen, Lee J Klein, Timothy M Klein, Robert W BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: This paper presents the model and results to evaluate the use of teriparatide as a first-line treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). The study’s objective was to determine if teriparatide is cost effective against oral bisphosphonates for two large and high risk cohorts. METHODS: A computer simulation model was created to model treatment, osteoporosis related fractures, and the remaining life of PMO and GIOP patients. Natural mortality and additional mortality from osteoporosis related fractures were included in the model. Costs for treatment with both teriparatide and oral bisphosphonates were included. Drug efficacy was modeled as a reduction to the relative fracture risk for subsequent osteoporosis related fractures. Patient health utilities associated with age, gender, and osteoporosis related fractures were included in the model. Patient costs and utilities were summarized and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for teriparatide versus oral bisphosphonates and teriparatide versus no treatment were estimated. For each of the PMO and GIOP populations, two cohorts differentiated by fracture history were simulated. The first contained patients with both a historical vertebral fracture and an incident vertebral fracture. The second contained patients with only an incident vertebral fracture. The PMO cohorts simulated had an initial Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score of −3.0. The GIOP cohorts simulated had an initial BMD T-Score of −2.5. RESULTS: The ICERs for teriparatide versus bisphosphonate use for the one and two fracture PMO cohorts were €36,995 per QALY and €19,371 per QALY. The ICERs for teriparatide versus bisphosphonate use for the one and two fracture GIOP cohorts were €20,826 per QALY and €15,155 per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The selection of teriparatide versus oral bisphosphonates as a first-line treatment for the high risk PMO and GIOP cohorts evaluated is justified at a cost per QALY threshold of €50,000. BioMed Central 2012-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3545974/ /pubmed/23110626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-213 Text en Copyright ©2012 Murphy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murphy, Daniel R
Smolen, Lee J
Klein, Timothy M
Klein, Robert W
The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden
title The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden
title_full The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden
title_fullStr The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden
title_full_unstemmed The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden
title_short The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden
title_sort cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in sweden
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3545974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-213
work_keys_str_mv AT murphydanielr thecosteffectivenessofteriparatideasafirstlinetreatmentforglucocorticoidinducedandpostmenopausalosteoporosispatientsinsweden
AT smolenleej thecosteffectivenessofteriparatideasafirstlinetreatmentforglucocorticoidinducedandpostmenopausalosteoporosispatientsinsweden
AT kleintimothym thecosteffectivenessofteriparatideasafirstlinetreatmentforglucocorticoidinducedandpostmenopausalosteoporosispatientsinsweden
AT kleinrobertw thecosteffectivenessofteriparatideasafirstlinetreatmentforglucocorticoidinducedandpostmenopausalosteoporosispatientsinsweden
AT murphydanielr costeffectivenessofteriparatideasafirstlinetreatmentforglucocorticoidinducedandpostmenopausalosteoporosispatientsinsweden
AT smolenleej costeffectivenessofteriparatideasafirstlinetreatmentforglucocorticoidinducedandpostmenopausalosteoporosispatientsinsweden
AT kleintimothym costeffectivenessofteriparatideasafirstlinetreatmentforglucocorticoidinducedandpostmenopausalosteoporosispatientsinsweden
AT kleinrobertw costeffectivenessofteriparatideasafirstlinetreatmentforglucocorticoidinducedandpostmenopausalosteoporosispatientsinsweden