Cargando…

Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods

BACKGROUND: Nanomaterials can be contaminated with endotoxin (lipopolysaccharides, LPS) during production or handling. In this study, we searched for a convenient in vitro method to evaluate endotoxin contamination in nanoparticle samples. We assessed the reliability of the commonly used limulus ame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smulders, Stijn, Kaiser, Jean-Pierre, Zuin, Stefano, Van Landuyt, Kirsten L, Golanski, Luana, Vanoirbeek, Jeroen, Wick, Peter, Hoet, Peter HM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23140310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-9-41
_version_ 1782255987221069824
author Smulders, Stijn
Kaiser, Jean-Pierre
Zuin, Stefano
Van Landuyt, Kirsten L
Golanski, Luana
Vanoirbeek, Jeroen
Wick, Peter
Hoet, Peter HM
author_facet Smulders, Stijn
Kaiser, Jean-Pierre
Zuin, Stefano
Van Landuyt, Kirsten L
Golanski, Luana
Vanoirbeek, Jeroen
Wick, Peter
Hoet, Peter HM
author_sort Smulders, Stijn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nanomaterials can be contaminated with endotoxin (lipopolysaccharides, LPS) during production or handling. In this study, we searched for a convenient in vitro method to evaluate endotoxin contamination in nanoparticle samples. We assessed the reliability of the commonly used limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay and an alternative method based on toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 reporter cells when applied with particles (TiO(2), Ag, CaCO(3) and SiO(2)), or after extraction of the endotoxin as described in the ISO norm 29701. RESULTS: Our results indicate that the gel clot LAL assay is easily disturbed in the presence of nanoparticles; and that the endotoxin extraction protocol is not suitable at high particle concentrations. The chromogenic-based LAL endotoxin detection systems (chromogenic LAL assay and Endosafe-PTS), and the TLR4 reporter cells were not significantly perturbed. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that nanoparticles can interfere with endotoxin detection systems indicating that a convenient test method must be chosen before assessing endotoxin contamination in nanoparticle samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3546036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35460362013-01-17 Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods Smulders, Stijn Kaiser, Jean-Pierre Zuin, Stefano Van Landuyt, Kirsten L Golanski, Luana Vanoirbeek, Jeroen Wick, Peter Hoet, Peter HM Part Fibre Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: Nanomaterials can be contaminated with endotoxin (lipopolysaccharides, LPS) during production or handling. In this study, we searched for a convenient in vitro method to evaluate endotoxin contamination in nanoparticle samples. We assessed the reliability of the commonly used limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay and an alternative method based on toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 reporter cells when applied with particles (TiO(2), Ag, CaCO(3) and SiO(2)), or after extraction of the endotoxin as described in the ISO norm 29701. RESULTS: Our results indicate that the gel clot LAL assay is easily disturbed in the presence of nanoparticles; and that the endotoxin extraction protocol is not suitable at high particle concentrations. The chromogenic-based LAL endotoxin detection systems (chromogenic LAL assay and Endosafe-PTS), and the TLR4 reporter cells were not significantly perturbed. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that nanoparticles can interfere with endotoxin detection systems indicating that a convenient test method must be chosen before assessing endotoxin contamination in nanoparticle samples. BioMed Central 2012-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3546036/ /pubmed/23140310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-9-41 Text en Copyright ©2012 Smulders et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Smulders, Stijn
Kaiser, Jean-Pierre
Zuin, Stefano
Van Landuyt, Kirsten L
Golanski, Luana
Vanoirbeek, Jeroen
Wick, Peter
Hoet, Peter HM
Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods
title Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods
title_full Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods
title_fullStr Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods
title_full_unstemmed Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods
title_short Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods
title_sort contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23140310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-9-41
work_keys_str_mv AT smuldersstijn contaminationofnanoparticlesbyendotoxinevaluationofdifferenttestmethods
AT kaiserjeanpierre contaminationofnanoparticlesbyendotoxinevaluationofdifferenttestmethods
AT zuinstefano contaminationofnanoparticlesbyendotoxinevaluationofdifferenttestmethods
AT vanlanduytkirstenl contaminationofnanoparticlesbyendotoxinevaluationofdifferenttestmethods
AT golanskiluana contaminationofnanoparticlesbyendotoxinevaluationofdifferenttestmethods
AT vanoirbeekjeroen contaminationofnanoparticlesbyendotoxinevaluationofdifferenttestmethods
AT wickpeter contaminationofnanoparticlesbyendotoxinevaluationofdifferenttestmethods
AT hoetpeterhm contaminationofnanoparticlesbyendotoxinevaluationofdifferenttestmethods