Cargando…
Intake to Production Ratio: A Measure of Exposure Intimacy for Manufactured Chemicals
Background: Limited data are available to assess human exposure to thousands of chemicals currently in commerce. Information that relates human intake of a chemical to its production and use can help inform understanding of mechanisms and pathways that control exposure and support efforts to protect...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23222017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204992 |
_version_ | 1782256041565618176 |
---|---|
author | Nazaroff, William Weschler, Charles J. Little, John C. Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen |
author_facet | Nazaroff, William Weschler, Charles J. Little, John C. Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen |
author_sort | Nazaroff, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Limited data are available to assess human exposure to thousands of chemicals currently in commerce. Information that relates human intake of a chemical to its production and use can help inform understanding of mechanisms and pathways that control exposure and support efforts to protect public health. Objectives: We introduce the intake-to-production ratio (IPR) as an economy-wide quantitative indicator of the extent to which chemical production results in human exposure. Methods: The IPR was evaluated as the ratio of two terms: aggregate rate of chemical uptake in a human population (inferred from urinary excretion data) divided by the rate that chemical is produced in or imported into that population’s economy. We used biomonitoring data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention along with chemical manufacturing data reported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as well as other published data, to estimate the IPR for nine chemicals in the United States. Results are reported in units of parts per million, where 1 ppm indicates 1 g of chemical uptake for every million grams of economy-wide use. Results: Estimated IPR values for the studied compounds span many orders of magnitude from a low of 0.6 ppm for bisphenol A to a high of > 180,000 ppm for methyl paraben. Intermediate results were obtained for five phthalates and two chlorinated aromatic compounds: 120 ppm for butyl benzyl phthalate, 670 ppm for di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, 760 ppm for di(n-butyl) phthalate, 1,040 ppm for para-dichlorobenzene, 6,800 ppm for di(isobutyl) phthalate, 7,700 ppm for diethyl phthalate, and 8,000–24,000 ppm (range) for triclosan. Conclusion: The IPR is well suited as an aggregate metric of exposure intensity for characterizing population-level exposure to synthesized chemicals, particularly those that move fairly rapidly from manufacture to human intake and have relatively stable production and intake rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3546365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35463652013-01-30 Intake to Production Ratio: A Measure of Exposure Intimacy for Manufactured Chemicals Nazaroff, William Weschler, Charles J. Little, John C. Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen Environ Health Perspect Research Background: Limited data are available to assess human exposure to thousands of chemicals currently in commerce. Information that relates human intake of a chemical to its production and use can help inform understanding of mechanisms and pathways that control exposure and support efforts to protect public health. Objectives: We introduce the intake-to-production ratio (IPR) as an economy-wide quantitative indicator of the extent to which chemical production results in human exposure. Methods: The IPR was evaluated as the ratio of two terms: aggregate rate of chemical uptake in a human population (inferred from urinary excretion data) divided by the rate that chemical is produced in or imported into that population’s economy. We used biomonitoring data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention along with chemical manufacturing data reported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as well as other published data, to estimate the IPR for nine chemicals in the United States. Results are reported in units of parts per million, where 1 ppm indicates 1 g of chemical uptake for every million grams of economy-wide use. Results: Estimated IPR values for the studied compounds span many orders of magnitude from a low of 0.6 ppm for bisphenol A to a high of > 180,000 ppm for methyl paraben. Intermediate results were obtained for five phthalates and two chlorinated aromatic compounds: 120 ppm for butyl benzyl phthalate, 670 ppm for di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, 760 ppm for di(n-butyl) phthalate, 1,040 ppm for para-dichlorobenzene, 6,800 ppm for di(isobutyl) phthalate, 7,700 ppm for diethyl phthalate, and 8,000–24,000 ppm (range) for triclosan. Conclusion: The IPR is well suited as an aggregate metric of exposure intensity for characterizing population-level exposure to synthesized chemicals, particularly those that move fairly rapidly from manufacture to human intake and have relatively stable production and intake rates. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2012-09-25 2012-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3546365/ /pubmed/23222017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204992 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Research Nazaroff, William Weschler, Charles J. Little, John C. Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen Intake to Production Ratio: A Measure of Exposure Intimacy for Manufactured Chemicals |
title | Intake to Production Ratio: A Measure of Exposure Intimacy for Manufactured Chemicals |
title_full | Intake to Production Ratio: A Measure of Exposure Intimacy for Manufactured Chemicals |
title_fullStr | Intake to Production Ratio: A Measure of Exposure Intimacy for Manufactured Chemicals |
title_full_unstemmed | Intake to Production Ratio: A Measure of Exposure Intimacy for Manufactured Chemicals |
title_short | Intake to Production Ratio: A Measure of Exposure Intimacy for Manufactured Chemicals |
title_sort | intake to production ratio: a measure of exposure intimacy for manufactured chemicals |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23222017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204992 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nazaroffwilliam intaketoproductionratioameasureofexposureintimacyformanufacturedchemicals AT weschlercharlesj intaketoproductionratioameasureofexposureintimacyformanufacturedchemicals AT littlejohnc intaketoproductionratioameasureofexposureintimacyformanufacturedchemicals AT hubalelaineacohen intaketoproductionratioameasureofexposureintimacyformanufacturedchemicals |