Cargando…

Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses

Measures that quantify the impact of heterogeneity in univariate meta-analysis, including the very popular I(2) statistic, are now well established. Multivariate meta-analysis, where studies provide multiple outcomes that are pooled in a single analysis, is also becoming more commonly used. The ques...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Dan, White, Ian R, Riley, Richard D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22763950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.5453
_version_ 1782256043908136960
author Jackson, Dan
White, Ian R
Riley, Richard D
author_facet Jackson, Dan
White, Ian R
Riley, Richard D
author_sort Jackson, Dan
collection PubMed
description Measures that quantify the impact of heterogeneity in univariate meta-analysis, including the very popular I(2) statistic, are now well established. Multivariate meta-analysis, where studies provide multiple outcomes that are pooled in a single analysis, is also becoming more commonly used. The question of how to quantify heterogeneity in the multivariate setting is therefore raised. It is the univariate R(2) statistic, the ratio of the variance of the estimated treatment effect under the random and fixed effects models, that generalises most naturally, so this statistic provides our basis. This statistic is then used to derive a multivariate analogue of I(2), which we call [Image: see text]. We also provide a multivariate H(2) statistic, the ratio of a generalisation of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic and its associated degrees of freedom, with an accompanying generalisation of the usual I(2) statistic, [Image: see text]. Our proposed heterogeneity statistics can be used alongside all the usual estimates and inferential procedures used in multivariate meta-analysis. We apply our methods to some real datasets and show how our statistics are equally appropriate in the context of multivariate meta-regression, where study level covariate effects are included in the model. Our heterogeneity statistics may be used when applying any procedure for fitting the multivariate random effects model. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3546377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35463772013-01-16 Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses Jackson, Dan White, Ian R Riley, Richard D Stat Med Research Articles Measures that quantify the impact of heterogeneity in univariate meta-analysis, including the very popular I(2) statistic, are now well established. Multivariate meta-analysis, where studies provide multiple outcomes that are pooled in a single analysis, is also becoming more commonly used. The question of how to quantify heterogeneity in the multivariate setting is therefore raised. It is the univariate R(2) statistic, the ratio of the variance of the estimated treatment effect under the random and fixed effects models, that generalises most naturally, so this statistic provides our basis. This statistic is then used to derive a multivariate analogue of I(2), which we call [Image: see text]. We also provide a multivariate H(2) statistic, the ratio of a generalisation of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic and its associated degrees of freedom, with an accompanying generalisation of the usual I(2) statistic, [Image: see text]. Our proposed heterogeneity statistics can be used alongside all the usual estimates and inferential procedures used in multivariate meta-analysis. We apply our methods to some real datasets and show how our statistics are equally appropriate in the context of multivariate meta-regression, where study level covariate effects are included in the model. Our heterogeneity statistics may be used when applying any procedure for fitting the multivariate random effects model. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-12-20 2012-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3546377/ /pubmed/22763950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.5453 Text en Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Jackson, Dan
White, Ian R
Riley, Richard D
Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses
title Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses
title_full Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses
title_fullStr Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses
title_short Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses
title_sort quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22763950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.5453
work_keys_str_mv AT jacksondan quantifyingtheimpactofbetweenstudyheterogeneityinmultivariatemetaanalyses
AT whiteianr quantifyingtheimpactofbetweenstudyheterogeneityinmultivariatemetaanalyses
AT rileyrichardd quantifyingtheimpactofbetweenstudyheterogeneityinmultivariatemetaanalyses