Cargando…

Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions

Free flaps, with their very high rates of success and low donor site morbidity, are considered the gold standard in head and neck reconstruction, allowing the transfer of ideal tissues for head and neck reconstruction. Nonetheless, under certain circumstances they may be contraindicated or cannot be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: COLLETTI, G., AUTELITANO, L., TEWFIK, K., RABBIOSI, D., BIGLIOLI, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore SpA 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326014
_version_ 1782256048429596672
author COLLETTI, G.
AUTELITANO, L.
TEWFIK, K.
RABBIOSI, D.
BIGLIOLI, F.
author_facet COLLETTI, G.
AUTELITANO, L.
TEWFIK, K.
RABBIOSI, D.
BIGLIOLI, F.
author_sort COLLETTI, G.
collection PubMed
description Free flaps, with their very high rates of success and low donor site morbidity, are considered the gold standard in head and neck reconstruction, allowing the transfer of ideal tissues for head and neck reconstruction. Nonetheless, under certain circumstances they may be contraindicated or cannot be utilized. We describe four subjects in which delayed locoregional flaps were used to reconstruct head and neck defects after a previous flap failure. Due to adverse anatomic and systemic conditions these patients were not suitable for a free flap, and thus one delayed prelaminated temporalis fasciocutaneous flap placement and three delayed supraclavicular flap (one of which was prelaminated) placements to reconstruct large defects of the cheek and commissural region needed to be performed. All flaps and grafts were viable. All patients in this case series had acceptable functional and aesthetic outcomes. Donor-site morbidity was negligible. Delayed locoregional flap placement required a total of three surgical sessions. Although limited, our experience suggests that in cases in which a free flap is contraindicated or not ideal, locoregional flaps may be a valid and safe alternative. Limitations of these procedures include increased duration of hospitalization and, foremost, the need for three-step surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3546399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Pacini Editore SpA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35463992013-01-16 Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions COLLETTI, G. AUTELITANO, L. TEWFIK, K. RABBIOSI, D. BIGLIOLI, F. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Case Series Free flaps, with their very high rates of success and low donor site morbidity, are considered the gold standard in head and neck reconstruction, allowing the transfer of ideal tissues for head and neck reconstruction. Nonetheless, under certain circumstances they may be contraindicated or cannot be utilized. We describe four subjects in which delayed locoregional flaps were used to reconstruct head and neck defects after a previous flap failure. Due to adverse anatomic and systemic conditions these patients were not suitable for a free flap, and thus one delayed prelaminated temporalis fasciocutaneous flap placement and three delayed supraclavicular flap (one of which was prelaminated) placements to reconstruct large defects of the cheek and commissural region needed to be performed. All flaps and grafts were viable. All patients in this case series had acceptable functional and aesthetic outcomes. Donor-site morbidity was negligible. Delayed locoregional flap placement required a total of three surgical sessions. Although limited, our experience suggests that in cases in which a free flap is contraindicated or not ideal, locoregional flaps may be a valid and safe alternative. Limitations of these procedures include increased duration of hospitalization and, foremost, the need for three-step surgery. Pacini Editore SpA 2012-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3546399/ /pubmed/23326014 Text en © Copyright by Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License, which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any digital medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. For details, please refer to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Case Series
COLLETTI, G.
AUTELITANO, L.
TEWFIK, K.
RABBIOSI, D.
BIGLIOLI, F.
Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions
title Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions
title_full Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions
title_fullStr Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions
title_full_unstemmed Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions
title_short Autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions
title_sort autonomized flaps in secondary head and neck reconstructions
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326014
work_keys_str_mv AT collettig autonomizedflapsinsecondaryheadandneckreconstructions
AT autelitanol autonomizedflapsinsecondaryheadandneckreconstructions
AT tewfikk autonomizedflapsinsecondaryheadandneckreconstructions
AT rabbiosid autonomizedflapsinsecondaryheadandneckreconstructions
AT bigliolif autonomizedflapsinsecondaryheadandneckreconstructions