Cargando…

Mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction

BACKGROUND: To identify insertion procedure and force application related complications in Jet Screw (JS) type mini-implants when inserted in the palatal slope. METHODS: Setting and Sample Population: The Department of Orthodontics, the University Hospital Münster. Forty-one consecutively started pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziebura, Thomas, Flieger, Stefanie, Wiechmann, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23157849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-32
_version_ 1782256054457860096
author Ziebura, Thomas
Flieger, Stefanie
Wiechmann, Dirk
author_facet Ziebura, Thomas
Flieger, Stefanie
Wiechmann, Dirk
author_sort Ziebura, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To identify insertion procedure and force application related complications in Jet Screw (JS) type mini-implants when inserted in the palatal slope. METHODS: Setting and Sample Population: The Department of Orthodontics, the University Hospital Münster. Forty-one consecutively started patients treated using mini-implants in the palatal slope. In this retrospective study, 66 JS were evaluated. Patient records were used to obtain data on the mode of utilization and complications. Standardized photographs overlayed with a virtual grid served to test the hypothesis that deviations from the recommended insertion site or the type of mechanics applied might be related to complications regarding bleeding, gingival overgrowth or implant failure. RESULTS: Two implants (3%) were lost, and two implants (3%), both loaded with a laterally directed force, exhibited loosening while still serving for anchorage. Complications that required treatment did not occur, the most severe problem observed being gingival proliferation which was attributable neither to patients’ age nor to applied mechanics or deviations from the ideal implant position. CONCLUSIONS: The JS mini-implant is reliable for sagittal and vertical movements or anchorage purposes. Laterally directed forces might be unfavorable. The selection of implant length as well as the insertion procedure should account for the possibility of gingival overgrowth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3546431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35464312013-01-17 Mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction Ziebura, Thomas Flieger, Stefanie Wiechmann, Dirk Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: To identify insertion procedure and force application related complications in Jet Screw (JS) type mini-implants when inserted in the palatal slope. METHODS: Setting and Sample Population: The Department of Orthodontics, the University Hospital Münster. Forty-one consecutively started patients treated using mini-implants in the palatal slope. In this retrospective study, 66 JS were evaluated. Patient records were used to obtain data on the mode of utilization and complications. Standardized photographs overlayed with a virtual grid served to test the hypothesis that deviations from the recommended insertion site or the type of mechanics applied might be related to complications regarding bleeding, gingival overgrowth or implant failure. RESULTS: Two implants (3%) were lost, and two implants (3%), both loaded with a laterally directed force, exhibited loosening while still serving for anchorage. Complications that required treatment did not occur, the most severe problem observed being gingival proliferation which was attributable neither to patients’ age nor to applied mechanics or deviations from the ideal implant position. CONCLUSIONS: The JS mini-implant is reliable for sagittal and vertical movements or anchorage purposes. Laterally directed forces might be unfavorable. The selection of implant length as well as the insertion procedure should account for the possibility of gingival overgrowth. BioMed Central 2012-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3546431/ /pubmed/23157849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-32 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ziebura et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ziebura, Thomas
Flieger, Stefanie
Wiechmann, Dirk
Mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction
title Mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction
title_full Mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction
title_fullStr Mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction
title_full_unstemmed Mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction
title_short Mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction
title_sort mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23157849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-32
work_keys_str_mv AT zieburathomas miniimplantsinthepalatalslopearetrospectiveanalysisofimplantsurvivalandtissuereaction
AT fliegerstefanie miniimplantsinthepalatalslopearetrospectiveanalysisofimplantsurvivalandtissuereaction
AT wiechmanndirk miniimplantsinthepalatalslopearetrospectiveanalysisofimplantsurvivalandtissuereaction