Cargando…

Uneven Magnitude of Disparities in Cancer Risks from Air Toxics

This study examines race- and income-based disparities in cancer risks from air toxics in Cancer Alley, LA, USA. Risk estimates were obtained from the 2005 National Air Toxics Assessment and socioeconomic and race data from the 2005 American Community Survey, both at the census tract level. Disparit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, Wesley, Jia, Chunrong, Kedia, Satish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23208297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9124365
_version_ 1782256107756978176
author James, Wesley
Jia, Chunrong
Kedia, Satish
author_facet James, Wesley
Jia, Chunrong
Kedia, Satish
author_sort James, Wesley
collection PubMed
description This study examines race- and income-based disparities in cancer risks from air toxics in Cancer Alley, LA, USA. Risk estimates were obtained from the 2005 National Air Toxics Assessment and socioeconomic and race data from the 2005 American Community Survey, both at the census tract level. Disparities were assessed using spatially weighted ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and quantile regression (QR) for five major air toxics, each with cancer risk greater than 10(−6). Spatial OLS results showed that disparities in cancer risks were significant: People in low-income tracts bore a cumulative risk 12% more than those in high-income tracts (p < 0.05), and those in black-dominant areas 16% more than in white-dominant areas (p < 0.01). Formaldehyde and benzene were the two largest contributors to the disparities. Contributions from emission sources to disparities varied by compound. Spatial QR analyses showed that magnitude of disparity became larger at the high end of exposure range, indicating worsened disparity in the poorest and most highly concentrated black areas. Cancer risk of air toxics not only disproportionately affects socioeconomically disadvantaged and racial minority communities, but there is a gradient effect within these groups with poorer and higher minority concentrated segments being more affected than their counterparts. Risk reduction strategies should target emission sources, risk driver chemicals, and especially the disadvantaged neighborhoods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3546767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35467672013-02-09 Uneven Magnitude of Disparities in Cancer Risks from Air Toxics James, Wesley Jia, Chunrong Kedia, Satish Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study examines race- and income-based disparities in cancer risks from air toxics in Cancer Alley, LA, USA. Risk estimates were obtained from the 2005 National Air Toxics Assessment and socioeconomic and race data from the 2005 American Community Survey, both at the census tract level. Disparities were assessed using spatially weighted ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and quantile regression (QR) for five major air toxics, each with cancer risk greater than 10(−6). Spatial OLS results showed that disparities in cancer risks were significant: People in low-income tracts bore a cumulative risk 12% more than those in high-income tracts (p < 0.05), and those in black-dominant areas 16% more than in white-dominant areas (p < 0.01). Formaldehyde and benzene were the two largest contributors to the disparities. Contributions from emission sources to disparities varied by compound. Spatial QR analyses showed that magnitude of disparity became larger at the high end of exposure range, indicating worsened disparity in the poorest and most highly concentrated black areas. Cancer risk of air toxics not only disproportionately affects socioeconomically disadvantaged and racial minority communities, but there is a gradient effect within these groups with poorer and higher minority concentrated segments being more affected than their counterparts. Risk reduction strategies should target emission sources, risk driver chemicals, and especially the disadvantaged neighborhoods. MDPI 2012-12-03 2012-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3546767/ /pubmed/23208297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9124365 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
James, Wesley
Jia, Chunrong
Kedia, Satish
Uneven Magnitude of Disparities in Cancer Risks from Air Toxics
title Uneven Magnitude of Disparities in Cancer Risks from Air Toxics
title_full Uneven Magnitude of Disparities in Cancer Risks from Air Toxics
title_fullStr Uneven Magnitude of Disparities in Cancer Risks from Air Toxics
title_full_unstemmed Uneven Magnitude of Disparities in Cancer Risks from Air Toxics
title_short Uneven Magnitude of Disparities in Cancer Risks from Air Toxics
title_sort uneven magnitude of disparities in cancer risks from air toxics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23208297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9124365
work_keys_str_mv AT jameswesley unevenmagnitudeofdisparitiesincancerrisksfromairtoxics
AT jiachunrong unevenmagnitudeofdisparitiesincancerrisksfromairtoxics
AT kediasatish unevenmagnitudeofdisparitiesincancerrisksfromairtoxics