Cargando…

QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND: The tuberculin skin test (TST) has limitations for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis in low-prevalence settings. Previously, all TST-positive individuals referred from the community to Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD) were offered LTBI treatment, after active TB was e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Maunank, Miele, Kathryn, Choi, Howard, DiPietro, Danielle, Martins-Evora, Maria, Marsiglia, Vincent, Dorman, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23253780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-360
_version_ 1782256121556238336
author Shah, Maunank
Miele, Kathryn
Choi, Howard
DiPietro, Danielle
Martins-Evora, Maria
Marsiglia, Vincent
Dorman, Susan
author_facet Shah, Maunank
Miele, Kathryn
Choi, Howard
DiPietro, Danielle
Martins-Evora, Maria
Marsiglia, Vincent
Dorman, Susan
author_sort Shah, Maunank
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The tuberculin skin test (TST) has limitations for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis in low-prevalence settings. Previously, all TST-positive individuals referred from the community to Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD) were offered LTBI treatment, after active TB was excluded. In 2010, BCHD introduced adjunctive QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) testing for TST-positive referrals. We evaluated costs and cost-effectiveness of this new diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: A decision-analysis model compared the strategy of treating all TST-positive referrals versus only those with positive results on adjunctive QFT-GIT testing. Costs were collected at BCHD, and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) were utilized to report on cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: QFT-GIT testing at BCHD cost $43.51 per test. Implementation of QFT-GIT testing was associated with an ICER of $1,202 per quality-adjusted life-year gained and was considered highly cost-effective. In sensitivity analysis, the QFT-GIT strategy became cost-saving if QFT-GIT sensitivity increased above 92% or if less than 3.5% of individuals with LTBI progress to active TB disease. CONCLUSIONS: LTBI screening with TST in low-prevalence settings may lead to overtreatment and increased expenditures. In this public health clinic, additional QFT-GIT testing of individuals referred for a positive TST was cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3546858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35468582013-01-17 QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: a cost-effectiveness analysis Shah, Maunank Miele, Kathryn Choi, Howard DiPietro, Danielle Martins-Evora, Maria Marsiglia, Vincent Dorman, Susan BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The tuberculin skin test (TST) has limitations for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis in low-prevalence settings. Previously, all TST-positive individuals referred from the community to Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD) were offered LTBI treatment, after active TB was excluded. In 2010, BCHD introduced adjunctive QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) testing for TST-positive referrals. We evaluated costs and cost-effectiveness of this new diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: A decision-analysis model compared the strategy of treating all TST-positive referrals versus only those with positive results on adjunctive QFT-GIT testing. Costs were collected at BCHD, and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) were utilized to report on cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: QFT-GIT testing at BCHD cost $43.51 per test. Implementation of QFT-GIT testing was associated with an ICER of $1,202 per quality-adjusted life-year gained and was considered highly cost-effective. In sensitivity analysis, the QFT-GIT strategy became cost-saving if QFT-GIT sensitivity increased above 92% or if less than 3.5% of individuals with LTBI progress to active TB disease. CONCLUSIONS: LTBI screening with TST in low-prevalence settings may lead to overtreatment and increased expenditures. In this public health clinic, additional QFT-GIT testing of individuals referred for a positive TST was cost-effective. BioMed Central 2012-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3546858/ /pubmed/23253780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-360 Text en Copyright ©2012 Shah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shah, Maunank
Miele, Kathryn
Choi, Howard
DiPietro, Danielle
Martins-Evora, Maria
Marsiglia, Vincent
Dorman, Susan
QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort quantiferon-tb gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23253780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-360
work_keys_str_mv AT shahmaunank quantiferontbgoldintubeimplementationforlatenttuberculosisdiagnosisinapublichealthclinicacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT mielekathryn quantiferontbgoldintubeimplementationforlatenttuberculosisdiagnosisinapublichealthclinicacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT choihoward quantiferontbgoldintubeimplementationforlatenttuberculosisdiagnosisinapublichealthclinicacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT dipietrodanielle quantiferontbgoldintubeimplementationforlatenttuberculosisdiagnosisinapublichealthclinicacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT martinsevoramaria quantiferontbgoldintubeimplementationforlatenttuberculosisdiagnosisinapublichealthclinicacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT marsigliavincent quantiferontbgoldintubeimplementationforlatenttuberculosisdiagnosisinapublichealthclinicacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT dormansusan quantiferontbgoldintubeimplementationforlatenttuberculosisdiagnosisinapublichealthclinicacosteffectivenessanalysis