Cargando…
Dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [DREAM] trial
BACKGROUND: Despite the growing popularity of massage, its effectiveness for treating neck pain remains unclear, largely because of the poor quality of research. A major deficiency of previous studies has been their use of low “doses” of massage that massage therapists consider inadequate. Unfortuna...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-158 |
_version_ | 1782256129268514816 |
---|---|
author | Sherman, Karen J Cook, Andrea J Kahn, Janet R Hawkes, Rene J Wellman, Robert D Cherkin, Daniel C |
author_facet | Sherman, Karen J Cook, Andrea J Kahn, Janet R Hawkes, Rene J Wellman, Robert D Cherkin, Daniel C |
author_sort | Sherman, Karen J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the growing popularity of massage, its effectiveness for treating neck pain remains unclear, largely because of the poor quality of research. A major deficiency of previous studies has been their use of low “doses” of massage that massage therapists consider inadequate. Unfortunately, the number of minutes per massage session, sessions per week, or weeks of treatment necessary for massage to have beneficial or optimal effects are not known. This study is designed to address these gaps in our knowledge by determining, for persons with chronic neck pain: 1) the optimal combination of number of treatments per week and length of individual treatment session, and 2) the optimal number of weeks of treatment. METHODS/DESIGN: In this study, 228 persons with chronic non-specific neck pain will be recruited from primary health care clinics in a large health care system in the Seattle area. Participants will be randomized to a wait list control group or 4 weeks of treatment with one of 5 different dosing combinations (2 or 3 30-min treatments per week or 1, 2, or 3 60-min treatments per week). At the end of this 4-week primary treatment period, participants initially receiving each of the 5 dosing combinations will be randomized to a secondary treatment period of either no additional treatment or 6 weekly 60-min massages. The primary outcomes, neck-related dysfunction and pain, will be assessed by blinded telephone interviewers 5, 12, and 26 weeks post-randomization. To better characterize the trajectory of treatment effects, these interview data will be supplemented with outcomes data collected by internet questionnaire at 10, 16, 20 and 39 weeks. Comparisons of outcomes for the 6 groups during the primary treatment period will identify the optimal weekly dose, while comparisons of outcomes during the secondary treatment period will determine if 10 weeks of treatment is superior to 4 weeks. DISCUSSION: A broad dosing schedule was included in this trial. If adherence to any of these doses is poor, those doses will be discontinued. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, with the ID number of NCT01122836 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3546891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35468912013-01-17 Dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [DREAM] trial Sherman, Karen J Cook, Andrea J Kahn, Janet R Hawkes, Rene J Wellman, Robert D Cherkin, Daniel C BMC Complement Altern Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite the growing popularity of massage, its effectiveness for treating neck pain remains unclear, largely because of the poor quality of research. A major deficiency of previous studies has been their use of low “doses” of massage that massage therapists consider inadequate. Unfortunately, the number of minutes per massage session, sessions per week, or weeks of treatment necessary for massage to have beneficial or optimal effects are not known. This study is designed to address these gaps in our knowledge by determining, for persons with chronic neck pain: 1) the optimal combination of number of treatments per week and length of individual treatment session, and 2) the optimal number of weeks of treatment. METHODS/DESIGN: In this study, 228 persons with chronic non-specific neck pain will be recruited from primary health care clinics in a large health care system in the Seattle area. Participants will be randomized to a wait list control group or 4 weeks of treatment with one of 5 different dosing combinations (2 or 3 30-min treatments per week or 1, 2, or 3 60-min treatments per week). At the end of this 4-week primary treatment period, participants initially receiving each of the 5 dosing combinations will be randomized to a secondary treatment period of either no additional treatment or 6 weekly 60-min massages. The primary outcomes, neck-related dysfunction and pain, will be assessed by blinded telephone interviewers 5, 12, and 26 weeks post-randomization. To better characterize the trajectory of treatment effects, these interview data will be supplemented with outcomes data collected by internet questionnaire at 10, 16, 20 and 39 weeks. Comparisons of outcomes for the 6 groups during the primary treatment period will identify the optimal weekly dose, while comparisons of outcomes during the secondary treatment period will determine if 10 weeks of treatment is superior to 4 weeks. DISCUSSION: A broad dosing schedule was included in this trial. If adherence to any of these doses is poor, those doses will be discontinued. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, with the ID number of NCT01122836 BioMed Central 2012-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3546891/ /pubmed/22985134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-158 Text en Copyright ©2012 Sherman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Sherman, Karen J Cook, Andrea J Kahn, Janet R Hawkes, Rene J Wellman, Robert D Cherkin, Daniel C Dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [DREAM] trial |
title | Dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [DREAM] trial |
title_full | Dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [DREAM] trial |
title_fullStr | Dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [DREAM] trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [DREAM] trial |
title_short | Dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [DREAM] trial |
title_sort | dosing study of massage for chronic neck pain: protocol for the dose response evaluation and analysis of massage [dream] trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shermankarenj dosingstudyofmassageforchronicneckpainprotocolforthedoseresponseevaluationandanalysisofmassagedreamtrial AT cookandreaj dosingstudyofmassageforchronicneckpainprotocolforthedoseresponseevaluationandanalysisofmassagedreamtrial AT kahnjanetr dosingstudyofmassageforchronicneckpainprotocolforthedoseresponseevaluationandanalysisofmassagedreamtrial AT hawkesrenej dosingstudyofmassageforchronicneckpainprotocolforthedoseresponseevaluationandanalysisofmassagedreamtrial AT wellmanrobertd dosingstudyofmassageforchronicneckpainprotocolforthedoseresponseevaluationandanalysisofmassagedreamtrial AT cherkindanielc dosingstudyofmassageforchronicneckpainprotocolforthedoseresponseevaluationandanalysisofmassagedreamtrial |