Cargando…

Safety of and Cellular Response to Segmental Bronchoprovocation in Allergic Asthma

RATIONALE: Despite its incorporation into research studies, the safety aspects of segmental allergen bronchoprovocation and differences in cellular response among different allergens have received limited consideration. METHODS: We performed 87 segmental challenges in 77 allergic asthma subjects. Al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denlinger, Loren C., Kelly, Elizabeth A. B., Dodge, Ann M., McCartney, John G., Meyer, Keith C., Cornwell, Richard D., Jackson, Mary Jo, Evans, Michael D., Jarjour, Nizar N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23341886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051963
_version_ 1782256158875058176
author Denlinger, Loren C.
Kelly, Elizabeth A. B.
Dodge, Ann M.
McCartney, John G.
Meyer, Keith C.
Cornwell, Richard D.
Jackson, Mary Jo
Evans, Michael D.
Jarjour, Nizar N.
author_facet Denlinger, Loren C.
Kelly, Elizabeth A. B.
Dodge, Ann M.
McCartney, John G.
Meyer, Keith C.
Cornwell, Richard D.
Jackson, Mary Jo
Evans, Michael D.
Jarjour, Nizar N.
author_sort Denlinger, Loren C.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Despite its incorporation into research studies, the safety aspects of segmental allergen bronchoprovocation and differences in cellular response among different allergens have received limited consideration. METHODS: We performed 87 segmental challenges in 77 allergic asthma subjects. Allergen dose was based on each subject’s response to whole lung allergen challenge. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed at 0 and 48 hours. Safety indicators included spirometry, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and symptoms. RESULTS: Among subjects challenged with ragweed, cat dander, or house dust mite, there were no differences in safety indicators. Subjects demonstrated a modest oxygen desaturation and tachycardia during the procedure that returned to normal prior to discharge. We observed a modest reduction in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second following bronchoscopy. The most common symptoms following the procedure were cough, sore throat and fatigue. Total bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell numbers increased from 13±4 to 106±108×10(4) per milliliter and eosinophils increased from 1±2 to 44±20 percent, with no significant differences among the three allergens. CONCLUSIONS: In mild allergic asthma, segmental allergen bronchoprovocation, using individualized doses of aeroallergens, was safe and yielded similar cellular responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3547018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35470182013-01-22 Safety of and Cellular Response to Segmental Bronchoprovocation in Allergic Asthma Denlinger, Loren C. Kelly, Elizabeth A. B. Dodge, Ann M. McCartney, John G. Meyer, Keith C. Cornwell, Richard D. Jackson, Mary Jo Evans, Michael D. Jarjour, Nizar N. PLoS One Research Article RATIONALE: Despite its incorporation into research studies, the safety aspects of segmental allergen bronchoprovocation and differences in cellular response among different allergens have received limited consideration. METHODS: We performed 87 segmental challenges in 77 allergic asthma subjects. Allergen dose was based on each subject’s response to whole lung allergen challenge. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed at 0 and 48 hours. Safety indicators included spirometry, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and symptoms. RESULTS: Among subjects challenged with ragweed, cat dander, or house dust mite, there were no differences in safety indicators. Subjects demonstrated a modest oxygen desaturation and tachycardia during the procedure that returned to normal prior to discharge. We observed a modest reduction in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second following bronchoscopy. The most common symptoms following the procedure were cough, sore throat and fatigue. Total bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell numbers increased from 13±4 to 106±108×10(4) per milliliter and eosinophils increased from 1±2 to 44±20 percent, with no significant differences among the three allergens. CONCLUSIONS: In mild allergic asthma, segmental allergen bronchoprovocation, using individualized doses of aeroallergens, was safe and yielded similar cellular responses. Public Library of Science 2013-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3547018/ /pubmed/23341886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051963 Text en © 2013 Denlinger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Denlinger, Loren C.
Kelly, Elizabeth A. B.
Dodge, Ann M.
McCartney, John G.
Meyer, Keith C.
Cornwell, Richard D.
Jackson, Mary Jo
Evans, Michael D.
Jarjour, Nizar N.
Safety of and Cellular Response to Segmental Bronchoprovocation in Allergic Asthma
title Safety of and Cellular Response to Segmental Bronchoprovocation in Allergic Asthma
title_full Safety of and Cellular Response to Segmental Bronchoprovocation in Allergic Asthma
title_fullStr Safety of and Cellular Response to Segmental Bronchoprovocation in Allergic Asthma
title_full_unstemmed Safety of and Cellular Response to Segmental Bronchoprovocation in Allergic Asthma
title_short Safety of and Cellular Response to Segmental Bronchoprovocation in Allergic Asthma
title_sort safety of and cellular response to segmental bronchoprovocation in allergic asthma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23341886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051963
work_keys_str_mv AT denlingerlorenc safetyofandcellularresponsetosegmentalbronchoprovocationinallergicasthma
AT kellyelizabethab safetyofandcellularresponsetosegmentalbronchoprovocationinallergicasthma
AT dodgeannm safetyofandcellularresponsetosegmentalbronchoprovocationinallergicasthma
AT mccartneyjohng safetyofandcellularresponsetosegmentalbronchoprovocationinallergicasthma
AT meyerkeithc safetyofandcellularresponsetosegmentalbronchoprovocationinallergicasthma
AT cornwellrichardd safetyofandcellularresponsetosegmentalbronchoprovocationinallergicasthma
AT jacksonmaryjo safetyofandcellularresponsetosegmentalbronchoprovocationinallergicasthma
AT evansmichaeld safetyofandcellularresponsetosegmentalbronchoprovocationinallergicasthma
AT jarjournizarn safetyofandcellularresponsetosegmentalbronchoprovocationinallergicasthma