Cargando…
Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles
BACKGROUND: Crocodilians exhibit a spectrum of rostral shape from long snouted (longirostrine), through to short snouted (brevirostrine) morphologies. The proportional length of the mandibular symphysis correlates consistently with rostral shape, forming as much as 50% of the mandible’s length in lo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23342027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053873 |
_version_ | 1782256166853672960 |
---|---|
author | Walmsley, Christopher W. Smits, Peter D. Quayle, Michelle R. McCurry, Matthew R. Richards, Heather S. Oldfield, Christopher C. Wroe, Stephen Clausen, Phillip D. McHenry, Colin R. |
author_facet | Walmsley, Christopher W. Smits, Peter D. Quayle, Michelle R. McCurry, Matthew R. Richards, Heather S. Oldfield, Christopher C. Wroe, Stephen Clausen, Phillip D. McHenry, Colin R. |
author_sort | Walmsley, Christopher W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Crocodilians exhibit a spectrum of rostral shape from long snouted (longirostrine), through to short snouted (brevirostrine) morphologies. The proportional length of the mandibular symphysis correlates consistently with rostral shape, forming as much as 50% of the mandible’s length in longirostrine forms, but 10% in brevirostrine crocodilians. Here we analyse the structural consequences of an elongate mandibular symphysis in relation to feeding behaviours. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Simple beam and high resolution Finite Element (FE) models of seven species of crocodile were analysed under loads simulating biting, shaking and twisting. Using beam theory, we statistically compared multiple hypotheses of which morphological variables should control the biomechanical response. Brevi- and mesorostrine morphologies were found to consistently outperform longirostrine types when subject to equivalent biting, shaking and twisting loads. The best predictors of performance for biting and twisting loads in FE models were overall length and symphyseal length respectively; for shaking loads symphyseal length and a multivariate measurement of shape (PC1– which is strongly but not exclusively correlated with symphyseal length) were equally good predictors. Linear measurements were better predictors than multivariate measurements of shape in biting and twisting loads. For both biting and shaking loads but not for twisting, simple beam models agree with best performance predictors in FE models. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Combining beam and FE modelling allows a priori hypotheses about the importance of morphological traits on biomechanics to be statistically tested. Short mandibular symphyses perform well under loads used for feeding upon large prey, but elongate symphyses incur high strains under equivalent loads, underlining the structural constraints to prey size in the longirostrine morphotype. The biomechanics of the crocodilian mandible are largely consistent with beam theory and can be predicted from simple morphological measurements, suggesting that crocodilians are a useful model for investigating the palaeobiomechanics of other aquatic tetrapods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3547052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35470522013-01-22 Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles Walmsley, Christopher W. Smits, Peter D. Quayle, Michelle R. McCurry, Matthew R. Richards, Heather S. Oldfield, Christopher C. Wroe, Stephen Clausen, Phillip D. McHenry, Colin R. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Crocodilians exhibit a spectrum of rostral shape from long snouted (longirostrine), through to short snouted (brevirostrine) morphologies. The proportional length of the mandibular symphysis correlates consistently with rostral shape, forming as much as 50% of the mandible’s length in longirostrine forms, but 10% in brevirostrine crocodilians. Here we analyse the structural consequences of an elongate mandibular symphysis in relation to feeding behaviours. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Simple beam and high resolution Finite Element (FE) models of seven species of crocodile were analysed under loads simulating biting, shaking and twisting. Using beam theory, we statistically compared multiple hypotheses of which morphological variables should control the biomechanical response. Brevi- and mesorostrine morphologies were found to consistently outperform longirostrine types when subject to equivalent biting, shaking and twisting loads. The best predictors of performance for biting and twisting loads in FE models were overall length and symphyseal length respectively; for shaking loads symphyseal length and a multivariate measurement of shape (PC1– which is strongly but not exclusively correlated with symphyseal length) were equally good predictors. Linear measurements were better predictors than multivariate measurements of shape in biting and twisting loads. For both biting and shaking loads but not for twisting, simple beam models agree with best performance predictors in FE models. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Combining beam and FE modelling allows a priori hypotheses about the importance of morphological traits on biomechanics to be statistically tested. Short mandibular symphyses perform well under loads used for feeding upon large prey, but elongate symphyses incur high strains under equivalent loads, underlining the structural constraints to prey size in the longirostrine morphotype. The biomechanics of the crocodilian mandible are largely consistent with beam theory and can be predicted from simple morphological measurements, suggesting that crocodilians are a useful model for investigating the palaeobiomechanics of other aquatic tetrapods. Public Library of Science 2013-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3547052/ /pubmed/23342027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053873 Text en © 2013 Walmsley et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Walmsley, Christopher W. Smits, Peter D. Quayle, Michelle R. McCurry, Matthew R. Richards, Heather S. Oldfield, Christopher C. Wroe, Stephen Clausen, Phillip D. McHenry, Colin R. Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles |
title | Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles |
title_full | Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles |
title_fullStr | Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles |
title_full_unstemmed | Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles |
title_short | Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles |
title_sort | why the long face? the mechanics of mandibular symphysis proportions in crocodiles |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23342027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053873 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walmsleychristopherw whythelongfacethemechanicsofmandibularsymphysisproportionsincrocodiles AT smitspeterd whythelongfacethemechanicsofmandibularsymphysisproportionsincrocodiles AT quaylemicheller whythelongfacethemechanicsofmandibularsymphysisproportionsincrocodiles AT mccurrymatthewr whythelongfacethemechanicsofmandibularsymphysisproportionsincrocodiles AT richardsheathers whythelongfacethemechanicsofmandibularsymphysisproportionsincrocodiles AT oldfieldchristopherc whythelongfacethemechanicsofmandibularsymphysisproportionsincrocodiles AT wroestephen whythelongfacethemechanicsofmandibularsymphysisproportionsincrocodiles AT clausenphillipd whythelongfacethemechanicsofmandibularsymphysisproportionsincrocodiles AT mchenrycolinr whythelongfacethemechanicsofmandibularsymphysisproportionsincrocodiles |