Cargando…
Detecting Cheaters without Thinking: Testing the Automaticity of the Cheater Detection Module
Evolutionary psychologists have suggested that our brain is composed of evolved mechanisms. One extensively studied mechanism is the cheater detection module. This module would make people very good at detecting cheaters in a social exchange. A vast amount of research has illustrated performance fac...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23342012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053827 |
_version_ | 1782256170142007296 |
---|---|
author | Van Lier, Jens Revlin, Russell De Neys, Wim |
author_facet | Van Lier, Jens Revlin, Russell De Neys, Wim |
author_sort | Van Lier, Jens |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evolutionary psychologists have suggested that our brain is composed of evolved mechanisms. One extensively studied mechanism is the cheater detection module. This module would make people very good at detecting cheaters in a social exchange. A vast amount of research has illustrated performance facilitation on social contract selection tasks. This facilitation is attributed to the alleged automatic and isolated operation of the module (i.e., independent of general cognitive capacity). This study, using the selection task, tested the critical automaticity assumption in three experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 established that performance on social contract versions did not depend on cognitive capacity or age. Experiment 3 showed that experimentally burdening cognitive resources with a secondary task had no impact on performance on the social contract version. However, in all experiments, performance on a non-social contract version did depend on available cognitive capacity. Overall, findings validate the automatic and effortless nature of social exchange reasoning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3547066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35470662013-01-22 Detecting Cheaters without Thinking: Testing the Automaticity of the Cheater Detection Module Van Lier, Jens Revlin, Russell De Neys, Wim PLoS One Research Article Evolutionary psychologists have suggested that our brain is composed of evolved mechanisms. One extensively studied mechanism is the cheater detection module. This module would make people very good at detecting cheaters in a social exchange. A vast amount of research has illustrated performance facilitation on social contract selection tasks. This facilitation is attributed to the alleged automatic and isolated operation of the module (i.e., independent of general cognitive capacity). This study, using the selection task, tested the critical automaticity assumption in three experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 established that performance on social contract versions did not depend on cognitive capacity or age. Experiment 3 showed that experimentally burdening cognitive resources with a secondary task had no impact on performance on the social contract version. However, in all experiments, performance on a non-social contract version did depend on available cognitive capacity. Overall, findings validate the automatic and effortless nature of social exchange reasoning. Public Library of Science 2013-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3547066/ /pubmed/23342012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053827 Text en © 2013 Van Lier et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Van Lier, Jens Revlin, Russell De Neys, Wim Detecting Cheaters without Thinking: Testing the Automaticity of the Cheater Detection Module |
title | Detecting Cheaters without Thinking: Testing the Automaticity of the Cheater Detection Module |
title_full | Detecting Cheaters without Thinking: Testing the Automaticity of the Cheater Detection Module |
title_fullStr | Detecting Cheaters without Thinking: Testing the Automaticity of the Cheater Detection Module |
title_full_unstemmed | Detecting Cheaters without Thinking: Testing the Automaticity of the Cheater Detection Module |
title_short | Detecting Cheaters without Thinking: Testing the Automaticity of the Cheater Detection Module |
title_sort | detecting cheaters without thinking: testing the automaticity of the cheater detection module |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23342012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053827 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanlierjens detectingcheaterswithoutthinkingtestingtheautomaticityofthecheaterdetectionmodule AT revlinrussell detectingcheaterswithoutthinkingtestingtheautomaticityofthecheaterdetectionmodule AT deneyswim detectingcheaterswithoutthinkingtestingtheautomaticityofthecheaterdetectionmodule |