Cargando…
Comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface
Advancing and receding contact angles of water, formamide and diiodomethane were measured on 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) layers deposited on three different solid supports—glass, mica and poly(methyl methacrylate). Up to five statistical monolayers were deposited on the surfac...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23335833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00396-012-2777-9 |
_version_ | 1782256276146749440 |
---|---|
author | Chibowski, Emil Jurak, Malgorzata |
author_facet | Chibowski, Emil Jurak, Malgorzata |
author_sort | Chibowski, Emil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Advancing and receding contact angles of water, formamide and diiodomethane were measured on 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) layers deposited on three different solid supports—glass, mica and poly(methyl methacrylate). Up to five statistical monolayers were deposited on the surfaces by spreading DPPC solution. It was found that even on five statistical DPPC monolayers, the hysteresis of a given liquid depends on the kind of solid support. Also on the same solid support the contact angle hysteresis is different for each probe liquid used. The AFM images show that the heights of roughness of the DPPC films cannot be the primary cause of the observed hysteresis because the heights are too small to cause the observed hystereses. It is believed that the hysteresis is due to the liquid film present right behind the three-phase solid surface/liquid drop/gas (vapour) contact line and the presence of Derjaguin pressure. The value of contact angle hysteresis depends on both the solid surface and liquid properties as well as on intermolecular interactions between them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3548097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35480972013-01-18 Comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface Chibowski, Emil Jurak, Malgorzata Colloid Polym Sci Original Contribution Advancing and receding contact angles of water, formamide and diiodomethane were measured on 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) layers deposited on three different solid supports—glass, mica and poly(methyl methacrylate). Up to five statistical monolayers were deposited on the surfaces by spreading DPPC solution. It was found that even on five statistical DPPC monolayers, the hysteresis of a given liquid depends on the kind of solid support. Also on the same solid support the contact angle hysteresis is different for each probe liquid used. The AFM images show that the heights of roughness of the DPPC films cannot be the primary cause of the observed hysteresis because the heights are too small to cause the observed hystereses. It is believed that the hysteresis is due to the liquid film present right behind the three-phase solid surface/liquid drop/gas (vapour) contact line and the presence of Derjaguin pressure. The value of contact angle hysteresis depends on both the solid surface and liquid properties as well as on intermolecular interactions between them. Springer-Verlag 2012-09-07 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3548097/ /pubmed/23335833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00396-012-2777-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Contribution Chibowski, Emil Jurak, Malgorzata Comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface |
title | Comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface |
title_full | Comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface |
title_fullStr | Comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface |
title_short | Comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface |
title_sort | comparison of contact angle hysteresis of different probe liquids on the same solid surface |
topic | Original Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23335833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00396-012-2777-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chibowskiemil comparisonofcontactanglehysteresisofdifferentprobeliquidsonthesamesolidsurface AT jurakmalgorzata comparisonofcontactanglehysteresisofdifferentprobeliquidsonthesamesolidsurface |