Cargando…
“Orphan” Retrogenes in the Human Genome
Gene duplicates generated via retroposition were long thought to be pseudogenized and consequently decayed. However, a significant number of these genes escaped their evolutionary destiny and evolved into functional genes. Despite multiple studies, the number of functional retrogenes in human and ot...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23066043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss235 |
_version_ | 1782256306899386368 |
---|---|
author | Ciomborowska, Joanna Rosikiewicz, Wojciech Szklarczyk, Damian Makałowski, Wojciech Makałowska, Izabela |
author_facet | Ciomborowska, Joanna Rosikiewicz, Wojciech Szklarczyk, Damian Makałowski, Wojciech Makałowska, Izabela |
author_sort | Ciomborowska, Joanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gene duplicates generated via retroposition were long thought to be pseudogenized and consequently decayed. However, a significant number of these genes escaped their evolutionary destiny and evolved into functional genes. Despite multiple studies, the number of functional retrogenes in human and other genomes remains unclear. We performed a comparative analysis of human, chicken, and worm genomes to identify “orphan” retrogenes, that is, retrogenes that have replaced their progenitors. We located 25 such candidates in the human genome. All of these genes were previously known, and the majority has been intensively studied. Despite this, they have never been recognized as retrogenes. Analysis revealed that the phenomenon of replacing parental genes with their retrocopies has been taking place over the entire span of animal evolution. This process was often species specific and contributed to interspecies differences. Surprisingly, these retrogenes, which should evolve in a more relaxed mode, are subject to a very strong purifying selection, which is, on average, two and a half times stronger than other human genes. Also, for retrogenes, they do not show a typical overall tendency for a testis-specific expression. Notably, seven of them are associated with human diseases. Recognizing them as “orphan” retrocopies, which have different regulatory machinery than their parents, is important for any disease studies in model organisms, especially when discoveries made in one species are transferred to humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3548309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35483092013-01-18 “Orphan” Retrogenes in the Human Genome Ciomborowska, Joanna Rosikiewicz, Wojciech Szklarczyk, Damian Makałowski, Wojciech Makałowska, Izabela Mol Biol Evol Discoveries Gene duplicates generated via retroposition were long thought to be pseudogenized and consequently decayed. However, a significant number of these genes escaped their evolutionary destiny and evolved into functional genes. Despite multiple studies, the number of functional retrogenes in human and other genomes remains unclear. We performed a comparative analysis of human, chicken, and worm genomes to identify “orphan” retrogenes, that is, retrogenes that have replaced their progenitors. We located 25 such candidates in the human genome. All of these genes were previously known, and the majority has been intensively studied. Despite this, they have never been recognized as retrogenes. Analysis revealed that the phenomenon of replacing parental genes with their retrocopies has been taking place over the entire span of animal evolution. This process was often species specific and contributed to interspecies differences. Surprisingly, these retrogenes, which should evolve in a more relaxed mode, are subject to a very strong purifying selection, which is, on average, two and a half times stronger than other human genes. Also, for retrogenes, they do not show a typical overall tendency for a testis-specific expression. Notably, seven of them are associated with human diseases. Recognizing them as “orphan” retrocopies, which have different regulatory machinery than their parents, is important for any disease studies in model organisms, especially when discoveries made in one species are transferred to humans. Oxford University Press 2013-02 2012-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3548309/ /pubmed/23066043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss235 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Discoveries Ciomborowska, Joanna Rosikiewicz, Wojciech Szklarczyk, Damian Makałowski, Wojciech Makałowska, Izabela “Orphan” Retrogenes in the Human Genome |
title | “Orphan” Retrogenes in the Human Genome |
title_full | “Orphan” Retrogenes in the Human Genome |
title_fullStr | “Orphan” Retrogenes in the Human Genome |
title_full_unstemmed | “Orphan” Retrogenes in the Human Genome |
title_short | “Orphan” Retrogenes in the Human Genome |
title_sort | “orphan” retrogenes in the human genome |
topic | Discoveries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23066043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ciomborowskajoanna orphanretrogenesinthehumangenome AT rosikiewiczwojciech orphanretrogenesinthehumangenome AT szklarczykdamian orphanretrogenesinthehumangenome AT makałowskiwojciech orphanretrogenesinthehumangenome AT makałowskaizabela orphanretrogenesinthehumangenome |