Cargando…

Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study

AIM: To evaluate the effect of direct and indirect technique, bevel placement, and aging on the fracture resistance of composite restorations bonded to sectioned incisal edges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Incisal thirds of 80 human maxillary incisors were sectioned. Four treatment groups of 20 teeth each...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poojary, Pradeep K, Bhandary, Shreetha, Srinivasan, Raghu, Nasreen, Farhat, Pramod, J, Mahesh, MC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23349572
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.105294
_version_ 1782256310212886528
author Poojary, Pradeep K
Bhandary, Shreetha
Srinivasan, Raghu
Nasreen, Farhat
Pramod, J
Mahesh, MC
author_facet Poojary, Pradeep K
Bhandary, Shreetha
Srinivasan, Raghu
Nasreen, Farhat
Pramod, J
Mahesh, MC
author_sort Poojary, Pradeep K
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the effect of direct and indirect technique, bevel placement, and aging on the fracture resistance of composite restorations bonded to sectioned incisal edges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Incisal thirds of 80 human maxillary incisors were sectioned. Four treatment groups of 20 teeth each were formed as follows: Direct composite with bevel and without bevel (Adper single bond 2/Filtek Z350); indirect composite with bevel and without bevel (prepolymerized Filtek Z350 cemented with Adper single bond 2/Relay × ARC). Ten teeth from each group were stored in distilled water for 24 h. The remaining ten teeth were stored in distilled water for 180 days with two thermocycling treatments. The specimens were subjected to shear testing using universal testing machine. Fractured specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification to evaluate the failure patterns. The obtained data were statistically analyzed by using ANOVA, Bonferroni test, and Student's t-test. RESULTS: Beveled restorations exhibited higher fracture resistance values than nonbeveled restorations. Long-term water storage decreased the fracture resistance. CONCLUSION: The use of bevels resulted in improved fracture resistance of composite restorations and reduced the impact of aging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3548341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35483412013-01-24 Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study Poojary, Pradeep K Bhandary, Shreetha Srinivasan, Raghu Nasreen, Farhat Pramod, J Mahesh, MC J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To evaluate the effect of direct and indirect technique, bevel placement, and aging on the fracture resistance of composite restorations bonded to sectioned incisal edges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Incisal thirds of 80 human maxillary incisors were sectioned. Four treatment groups of 20 teeth each were formed as follows: Direct composite with bevel and without bevel (Adper single bond 2/Filtek Z350); indirect composite with bevel and without bevel (prepolymerized Filtek Z350 cemented with Adper single bond 2/Relay × ARC). Ten teeth from each group were stored in distilled water for 24 h. The remaining ten teeth were stored in distilled water for 180 days with two thermocycling treatments. The specimens were subjected to shear testing using universal testing machine. Fractured specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification to evaluate the failure patterns. The obtained data were statistically analyzed by using ANOVA, Bonferroni test, and Student's t-test. RESULTS: Beveled restorations exhibited higher fracture resistance values than nonbeveled restorations. Long-term water storage decreased the fracture resistance. CONCLUSION: The use of bevels resulted in improved fracture resistance of composite restorations and reduced the impact of aging. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3548341/ /pubmed/23349572 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.105294 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Poojary, Pradeep K
Bhandary, Shreetha
Srinivasan, Raghu
Nasreen, Farhat
Pramod, J
Mahesh, MC
Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study
title Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study
title_full Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study
title_fullStr Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study
title_short Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study
title_sort influence of restorative technique, bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: a comparative in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23349572
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.105294
work_keys_str_mv AT poojarypradeepk influenceofrestorativetechniquebevellingandagingoncompositebondingtosectionedincisaledgesacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT bhandaryshreetha influenceofrestorativetechniquebevellingandagingoncompositebondingtosectionedincisaledgesacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT srinivasanraghu influenceofrestorativetechniquebevellingandagingoncompositebondingtosectionedincisaledgesacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT nasreenfarhat influenceofrestorativetechniquebevellingandagingoncompositebondingtosectionedincisaledgesacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT pramodj influenceofrestorativetechniquebevellingandagingoncompositebondingtosectionedincisaledgesacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT maheshmc influenceofrestorativetechniquebevellingandagingoncompositebondingtosectionedincisaledgesacomparativeinvitrostudy