Cargando…

Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study

AIM: To evaluate the biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q mix™ 2 in 1 in comparison to 0.9% sterile saline, 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six circles were drawn on the dorsal skin of 24 male W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandrasekhar, Veeramachaneni, Amulya, Vanapatla, Rani, Vanapatla Swaroopa, Prakash, T Jaya, Ranjani, A Siva, Gayathri, Ch
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23349574
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.105296
_version_ 1782256310677405696
author Chandrasekhar, Veeramachaneni
Amulya, Vanapatla
Rani, Vanapatla Swaroopa
Prakash, T Jaya
Ranjani, A Siva
Gayathri, Ch
author_facet Chandrasekhar, Veeramachaneni
Amulya, Vanapatla
Rani, Vanapatla Swaroopa
Prakash, T Jaya
Ranjani, A Siva
Gayathri, Ch
author_sort Chandrasekhar, Veeramachaneni
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q mix™ 2 in 1 in comparison to 0.9% sterile saline, 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six circles were drawn on the dorsal skin of 24 male Wistar Albino rats, leaving 2cm between each circle. Using a syringe, 0.1mL of each root canal irrigant was injected subcutaneously into five circles. In the sixth circle, the needle of an empty syringe was introduced into the skin, but no irrigant was injected (control group). Evaluations were done at 2 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 30 days postprocedure. Tissue samples were excised, embedded in paraffin blocks, and 3 μm thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The areas of inflammatory reaction were evaluated. From each tissue sample, five sections presenting the greatest inflammatory reactions were examined under a light microscope, and analyzed statistically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test. RESULTS: At the two-hour examination period, all the irrigants showed a slight increase in the number of inflammatory cells, at 48 hours, the number of inflammatory cells were increased significantly, and after 14 and 30 days, they were decreased gradually. Qmix™ 2 in 1 showed a smaller number of inflammatory cells than other irrigants tested. CONCLUSION: QMix™ 2 in 1 was shown to be less toxic to the rat subcutaneous tissue than 3% NaOCl, 2% CHX, and 17% EDTA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3548343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35483432013-01-24 Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study Chandrasekhar, Veeramachaneni Amulya, Vanapatla Rani, Vanapatla Swaroopa Prakash, T Jaya Ranjani, A Siva Gayathri, Ch J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To evaluate the biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q mix™ 2 in 1 in comparison to 0.9% sterile saline, 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six circles were drawn on the dorsal skin of 24 male Wistar Albino rats, leaving 2cm between each circle. Using a syringe, 0.1mL of each root canal irrigant was injected subcutaneously into five circles. In the sixth circle, the needle of an empty syringe was introduced into the skin, but no irrigant was injected (control group). Evaluations were done at 2 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 30 days postprocedure. Tissue samples were excised, embedded in paraffin blocks, and 3 μm thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The areas of inflammatory reaction were evaluated. From each tissue sample, five sections presenting the greatest inflammatory reactions were examined under a light microscope, and analyzed statistically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test. RESULTS: At the two-hour examination period, all the irrigants showed a slight increase in the number of inflammatory cells, at 48 hours, the number of inflammatory cells were increased significantly, and after 14 and 30 days, they were decreased gradually. Qmix™ 2 in 1 showed a smaller number of inflammatory cells than other irrigants tested. CONCLUSION: QMix™ 2 in 1 was shown to be less toxic to the rat subcutaneous tissue than 3% NaOCl, 2% CHX, and 17% EDTA. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3548343/ /pubmed/23349574 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.105296 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chandrasekhar, Veeramachaneni
Amulya, Vanapatla
Rani, Vanapatla Swaroopa
Prakash, T Jaya
Ranjani, A Siva
Gayathri, Ch
Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study
title Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study
title_full Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study
title_fullStr Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study
title_short Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study
title_sort evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant q mix™ 2 in 1- an in vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23349574
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.105296
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrasekharveeramachaneni evaluationofbiocompatibilityofanewrootcanalirrigantqmix2in1aninvivostudy
AT amulyavanapatla evaluationofbiocompatibilityofanewrootcanalirrigantqmix2in1aninvivostudy
AT ranivanapatlaswaroopa evaluationofbiocompatibilityofanewrootcanalirrigantqmix2in1aninvivostudy
AT prakashtjaya evaluationofbiocompatibilityofanewrootcanalirrigantqmix2in1aninvivostudy
AT ranjaniasiva evaluationofbiocompatibilityofanewrootcanalirrigantqmix2in1aninvivostudy
AT gayathrich evaluationofbiocompatibilityofanewrootcanalirrigantqmix2in1aninvivostudy