Choroidal neovascularization reduced by targeted drug delivery with cationic liposome-encapsulated paclitaxel or targeted photodynamic therapy with verteporfin encapsulated in cationic liposomes

PURPOSE: Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) application has revolutionized the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), a hallmark of wet age-related macular degeneration. However, additional treatment options are desirable as not all CNV lesions respond to anti-VEGF injections. Here, we assessed the feasibility of targeted delivery of cationic liposome-encapsulated paclitaxel (EndoTAG-1) in treating CNV. Furthermore, we investigated whether a new formulation of verteporfin encapsulated in cationic liposomes (CL-VTP) enhances the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT). METHODS: EndoTAG-1, LipoSPA, and CL-VTP were produced by encapsulating paclitaxel, succinyl-paclitaxel, or verteporfin in cationic liposomes (CL). Mice underwent argon laser coagulations at day 0 (D0) to induce CNV. EndoTAG-1 and LipoSPA were injected into the tail vein at D1, D3, D5, D7, and D9. Taxol, CL, or trehalose buffer alone was injected in control animals. At D10, all animals were perfused with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran. Flatmounts comprising the retinal pigment epithelium, choroid, and sclera were prepared for quantifying the CNV by measuring the area of lesions perfused with FITC-dextran. For PDT, mice received an injection with CL-VTP or Visudyne at D10. One eye was treated with PDT while the other served as a control. Evaluation of RPE-choroid-scleral and retinal flatmounts was performed at D12, D14, or D17. Perfusion with FITC-dextran and tetramethylrhodamine-5-(and 6)-isothiocyanate-lectin staining was used to distinguish between perfused and non-perfused choroidal vessels. RESULTS: EndoTAG-1 or LipoSPA significantly reduced CNV size to 15% compared to trehalose controls. The mean CNV area of mice treated with CL was reduced (though not significantly) to about one-half of the value of the trehalose control group. The same was observed for paclitaxel. Thus, the reduction in the CNV size between treatment with CL and treatment with EndoTAG-1 or LipoSPA was 40%, which was not significant. PDT using either CL-VTP or Visudyne reduced CNV size to 65% (D17) of trehalose control size. CNV size was further diminished to 56% with Visudyne and 53% with CL-VTP when PDT was repeated twice. Most importantly, PDT-associated retinal damage was less pronounced using CL-VTP compared to Visudyne. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic intravenous injection of paclitaxel (EndoTAG-1)- or succinyl-paclitaxel (LipoSPA)-loaded CL had a significant antiangiogenic effect in a CNV mouse model. PDT with CL-VTP was as effective as Visudyne in neovascular obliteration but induced less tissue damage. Our data suggest that systemic application of cationic liposome formulations may serve to treat ocular neovascular diseases. This approach may reduce the need for intraocular injections and may benefit patients with neovascular lesions irresponsive to anti-VEGF treatment.