Cargando…
Patient and doctor attitudes and beliefs concerning perioperative do not resuscitate orders: anesthesiologists’ growing compliance with patient autonomy and self determination guidelines
BACKGROUND: In 1993, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) published guidelines stating that automatic perioperative suspension of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders conflicts with patients’ rights to self-determination. Almost 20 years later, we aimed to explore both patient and doctor views...
Autores principales: | Burkle, Christopher M, Swetz, Keith M, Armstrong, Matthew H, Keegan, Mark T |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23320623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-13-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders: Trainee experiential learning in preserving patient autonomy and knowledge of professional guidelines
por: Kushelev, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Physician perspectives and compliance with patient advance directives: the role external factors play on physician decision making
por: Burkle, Christopher M, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The role of the anesthesiologist in perioperative patient safety
por: Wacker, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Chest Compression Only and Teamwork From the Perspective of Medical Doctors, Surgeons and Anesthesiologists
por: Krajina, Irena, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders: it is time to talk
por: Brindley, Peter G
Publicado: (2013)