Cargando…

Can the London 2012 Olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE: To examine if there is an increased participation in physical or sporting activities following an Olympic or Paralympic games. DESIGN: Overview of systematic reviews. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, DARE, SportDISCUS and Web of Knowledge databases. In addition, we sear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahtani, Kamal Ram, Protheroe, Joanne, Slight, Sarah Patricia, Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva, Blakeman, Thomas, Barton, Christopher A, Brijnath, Bianca, Roberts, Nia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23299112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002058
_version_ 1782256390099697664
author Mahtani, Kamal Ram
Protheroe, Joanne
Slight, Sarah Patricia
Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva
Blakeman, Thomas
Barton, Christopher A
Brijnath, Bianca
Roberts, Nia
author_facet Mahtani, Kamal Ram
Protheroe, Joanne
Slight, Sarah Patricia
Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva
Blakeman, Thomas
Barton, Christopher A
Brijnath, Bianca
Roberts, Nia
author_sort Mahtani, Kamal Ram
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine if there is an increased participation in physical or sporting activities following an Olympic or Paralympic games. DESIGN: Overview of systematic reviews. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, DARE, SportDISCUS and Web of Knowledge databases. In addition, we searched for ‘grey literature’ in Google, Google scholar and on the International Olympic Committee websites. We restricted our search to those reviews published in English. We used the AMSTAR tool to assess the methodological quality of those systematic reviews included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was evidence for an increased participation in physical or sporting activities. Secondary outcomes included public perceptions of sport during and after an Olympic games, barriers to increased sports participation and any other non-sporting health benefits. RESULTS: Our systematic search revealed 844 citations, of which only two matched our inclusion criteria. The quality of these two reviews was assessed by three independent reviewers as ‘good’ using the AMSTAR tool for quality appraisal. Both reviews reported little evidence of an increased uptake of sporting activity following an Olympic Games event. Other effects on health, for example, changes in hospital admissions, suicide rates and drug use, were cited although there was insufficient evidence to see an overall effect. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of evidence to support the notion that hosting an Olympic games leads to an increased participation in physical or sporting activities for host countries. We also found little evidence to suggest other health benefits. We conclude that the true success of these and future games should be evaluated by high-quality, evidence-based studies that have been commissioned before, during and following the completion of the event. Only then can the true success and legacy of the games be established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3549211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35492112013-01-23 Can the London 2012 Olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews Mahtani, Kamal Ram Protheroe, Joanne Slight, Sarah Patricia Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva Blakeman, Thomas Barton, Christopher A Brijnath, Bianca Roberts, Nia BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine OBJECTIVE: To examine if there is an increased participation in physical or sporting activities following an Olympic or Paralympic games. DESIGN: Overview of systematic reviews. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, DARE, SportDISCUS and Web of Knowledge databases. In addition, we searched for ‘grey literature’ in Google, Google scholar and on the International Olympic Committee websites. We restricted our search to those reviews published in English. We used the AMSTAR tool to assess the methodological quality of those systematic reviews included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was evidence for an increased participation in physical or sporting activities. Secondary outcomes included public perceptions of sport during and after an Olympic games, barriers to increased sports participation and any other non-sporting health benefits. RESULTS: Our systematic search revealed 844 citations, of which only two matched our inclusion criteria. The quality of these two reviews was assessed by three independent reviewers as ‘good’ using the AMSTAR tool for quality appraisal. Both reviews reported little evidence of an increased uptake of sporting activity following an Olympic Games event. Other effects on health, for example, changes in hospital admissions, suicide rates and drug use, were cited although there was insufficient evidence to see an overall effect. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of evidence to support the notion that hosting an Olympic games leads to an increased participation in physical or sporting activities for host countries. We also found little evidence to suggest other health benefits. We conclude that the true success of these and future games should be evaluated by high-quality, evidence-based studies that have been commissioned before, during and following the completion of the event. Only then can the true success and legacy of the games be established. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3549211/ /pubmed/23299112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002058 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Sports and Exercise Medicine
Mahtani, Kamal Ram
Protheroe, Joanne
Slight, Sarah Patricia
Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva
Blakeman, Thomas
Barton, Christopher A
Brijnath, Bianca
Roberts, Nia
Can the London 2012 Olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews
title Can the London 2012 Olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews
title_full Can the London 2012 Olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Can the London 2012 Olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Can the London 2012 Olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews
title_short Can the London 2012 Olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews
title_sort can the london 2012 olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? an overview of systematic reviews
topic Sports and Exercise Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23299112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002058
work_keys_str_mv AT mahtanikamalram canthelondon2012olympicsinspireagenerationtodomorephysicalorsportingactivitiesanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT protheroejoanne canthelondon2012olympicsinspireagenerationtodomorephysicalorsportingactivitiesanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT slightsarahpatricia canthelondon2012olympicsinspireagenerationtodomorephysicalorsportingactivitiesanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT demarzomarcelomarcospiva canthelondon2012olympicsinspireagenerationtodomorephysicalorsportingactivitiesanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT blakemanthomas canthelondon2012olympicsinspireagenerationtodomorephysicalorsportingactivitiesanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT bartonchristophera canthelondon2012olympicsinspireagenerationtodomorephysicalorsportingactivitiesanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT brijnathbianca canthelondon2012olympicsinspireagenerationtodomorephysicalorsportingactivitiesanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT robertsnia canthelondon2012olympicsinspireagenerationtodomorephysicalorsportingactivitiesanoverviewofsystematicreviews