Cargando…

Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: This is a review of literature on the indications, technique, and outcome of portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS: A systematic literature search on outcome of PVE from 1990 to 2011 was performed in Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases. RESULTS: Forty-four articles were selected, incl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Lienden, K. P., van den Esschert, J. W., de Graaf, W., Bipat, S., Lameris, J. S., van Gulik, T. M., van Delden, O. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22806245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0440-y
_version_ 1782256395684413440
author van Lienden, K. P.
van den Esschert, J. W.
de Graaf, W.
Bipat, S.
Lameris, J. S.
van Gulik, T. M.
van Delden, O. M.
author_facet van Lienden, K. P.
van den Esschert, J. W.
de Graaf, W.
Bipat, S.
Lameris, J. S.
van Gulik, T. M.
van Delden, O. M.
author_sort van Lienden, K. P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This is a review of literature on the indications, technique, and outcome of portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS: A systematic literature search on outcome of PVE from 1990 to 2011 was performed in Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases. RESULTS: Forty-four articles were selected, including 1,791 patients with a mean age of 61 ± 4.1 years. Overall technical success rate was 99.3 %. The mean hypertrophy rate of the FRL after PVE was 37.9 ± 0.1 %. In 70 patients (3.9 %), surgery was not performed because of failure of PVE (clinical success rate 96.1 %). In 51 patients (2.8 %), the hypertrophy response was insufficient to perform liver resection. In the other 17 cases, 12 did not technically succeed (0.7 %) and 7 caused a complication leading to unresectability (0.4 %). In 6.1 %, resection was cancelled because of local tumor progression after PVE. Major complications were seen in 2.5 %, and the mortality rate was 0.1 %. A head-to-head comparison shows a negative effect of liver cirrhosis on hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate seems to have a greater effect on hypertrophy, but the difference with other embolization materials did not reach statistical significance. No difference in regeneration is seen in patients with cholestasis or chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PVE has a high technical and clinical success rate. Liver cirrhosis has a negative effect on regeneration, but cholestasis and chemotherapy do not seem to have an influence on the hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate may result in a greater hypertrophy response compared with other embolization materials used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3549243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35492432013-01-22 Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review van Lienden, K. P. van den Esschert, J. W. de Graaf, W. Bipat, S. Lameris, J. S. van Gulik, T. M. van Delden, O. M. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Review Article/State of the Art PURPOSE: This is a review of literature on the indications, technique, and outcome of portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS: A systematic literature search on outcome of PVE from 1990 to 2011 was performed in Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases. RESULTS: Forty-four articles were selected, including 1,791 patients with a mean age of 61 ± 4.1 years. Overall technical success rate was 99.3 %. The mean hypertrophy rate of the FRL after PVE was 37.9 ± 0.1 %. In 70 patients (3.9 %), surgery was not performed because of failure of PVE (clinical success rate 96.1 %). In 51 patients (2.8 %), the hypertrophy response was insufficient to perform liver resection. In the other 17 cases, 12 did not technically succeed (0.7 %) and 7 caused a complication leading to unresectability (0.4 %). In 6.1 %, resection was cancelled because of local tumor progression after PVE. Major complications were seen in 2.5 %, and the mortality rate was 0.1 %. A head-to-head comparison shows a negative effect of liver cirrhosis on hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate seems to have a greater effect on hypertrophy, but the difference with other embolization materials did not reach statistical significance. No difference in regeneration is seen in patients with cholestasis or chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PVE has a high technical and clinical success rate. Liver cirrhosis has a negative effect on regeneration, but cholestasis and chemotherapy do not seem to have an influence on the hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate may result in a greater hypertrophy response compared with other embolization materials used. Springer-Verlag 2012-07-18 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3549243/ /pubmed/22806245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0440-y Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article/State of the Art
van Lienden, K. P.
van den Esschert, J. W.
de Graaf, W.
Bipat, S.
Lameris, J. S.
van Gulik, T. M.
van Delden, O. M.
Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
title Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
title_full Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
title_short Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
title_sort portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review
topic Review Article/State of the Art
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22806245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0440-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vanliendenkp portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview
AT vandenesschertjw portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview
AT degraafw portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview
AT bipats portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview
AT lamerisjs portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview
AT vanguliktm portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview
AT vandeldenom portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview