Cargando…
Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
PURPOSE: This is a review of literature on the indications, technique, and outcome of portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS: A systematic literature search on outcome of PVE from 1990 to 2011 was performed in Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases. RESULTS: Forty-four articles were selected, incl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22806245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0440-y |
_version_ | 1782256395684413440 |
---|---|
author | van Lienden, K. P. van den Esschert, J. W. de Graaf, W. Bipat, S. Lameris, J. S. van Gulik, T. M. van Delden, O. M. |
author_facet | van Lienden, K. P. van den Esschert, J. W. de Graaf, W. Bipat, S. Lameris, J. S. van Gulik, T. M. van Delden, O. M. |
author_sort | van Lienden, K. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This is a review of literature on the indications, technique, and outcome of portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS: A systematic literature search on outcome of PVE from 1990 to 2011 was performed in Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases. RESULTS: Forty-four articles were selected, including 1,791 patients with a mean age of 61 ± 4.1 years. Overall technical success rate was 99.3 %. The mean hypertrophy rate of the FRL after PVE was 37.9 ± 0.1 %. In 70 patients (3.9 %), surgery was not performed because of failure of PVE (clinical success rate 96.1 %). In 51 patients (2.8 %), the hypertrophy response was insufficient to perform liver resection. In the other 17 cases, 12 did not technically succeed (0.7 %) and 7 caused a complication leading to unresectability (0.4 %). In 6.1 %, resection was cancelled because of local tumor progression after PVE. Major complications were seen in 2.5 %, and the mortality rate was 0.1 %. A head-to-head comparison shows a negative effect of liver cirrhosis on hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate seems to have a greater effect on hypertrophy, but the difference with other embolization materials did not reach statistical significance. No difference in regeneration is seen in patients with cholestasis or chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PVE has a high technical and clinical success rate. Liver cirrhosis has a negative effect on regeneration, but cholestasis and chemotherapy do not seem to have an influence on the hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate may result in a greater hypertrophy response compared with other embolization materials used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3549243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35492432013-01-22 Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review van Lienden, K. P. van den Esschert, J. W. de Graaf, W. Bipat, S. Lameris, J. S. van Gulik, T. M. van Delden, O. M. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Review Article/State of the Art PURPOSE: This is a review of literature on the indications, technique, and outcome of portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS: A systematic literature search on outcome of PVE from 1990 to 2011 was performed in Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases. RESULTS: Forty-four articles were selected, including 1,791 patients with a mean age of 61 ± 4.1 years. Overall technical success rate was 99.3 %. The mean hypertrophy rate of the FRL after PVE was 37.9 ± 0.1 %. In 70 patients (3.9 %), surgery was not performed because of failure of PVE (clinical success rate 96.1 %). In 51 patients (2.8 %), the hypertrophy response was insufficient to perform liver resection. In the other 17 cases, 12 did not technically succeed (0.7 %) and 7 caused a complication leading to unresectability (0.4 %). In 6.1 %, resection was cancelled because of local tumor progression after PVE. Major complications were seen in 2.5 %, and the mortality rate was 0.1 %. A head-to-head comparison shows a negative effect of liver cirrhosis on hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate seems to have a greater effect on hypertrophy, but the difference with other embolization materials did not reach statistical significance. No difference in regeneration is seen in patients with cholestasis or chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PVE has a high technical and clinical success rate. Liver cirrhosis has a negative effect on regeneration, but cholestasis and chemotherapy do not seem to have an influence on the hypertrophy response. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate may result in a greater hypertrophy response compared with other embolization materials used. Springer-Verlag 2012-07-18 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3549243/ /pubmed/22806245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0440-y Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article/State of the Art van Lienden, K. P. van den Esschert, J. W. de Graaf, W. Bipat, S. Lameris, J. S. van Gulik, T. M. van Delden, O. M. Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review |
title | Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Portal Vein Embolization Before Liver Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article/State of the Art |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22806245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0440-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanliendenkp portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview AT vandenesschertjw portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview AT degraafw portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview AT bipats portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview AT lamerisjs portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview AT vanguliktm portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview AT vandeldenom portalveinembolizationbeforeliverresectionasystematicreview |