Cargando…

Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection

INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of pathogens, rather than colonising bacteria, is a prerequisite for targeted antibiotic therapy to ensure optimal patient outcome in wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers. Wound swabs are the easiest and most commonly used sampling technique but most published g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelson, E Andrea, Backhouse, Michael Ross, Bhogal, Moninder S, Wright-Hughes, Alexandra, Lipsky, Benjamin A, Nixon, Jane, Brown, Sarah, Gray, Janine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23293263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002370
_version_ 1782256398464188416
author Nelson, E Andrea
Backhouse, Michael Ross
Bhogal, Moninder S
Wright-Hughes, Alexandra
Lipsky, Benjamin A
Nixon, Jane
Brown, Sarah
Gray, Janine
author_facet Nelson, E Andrea
Backhouse, Michael Ross
Bhogal, Moninder S
Wright-Hughes, Alexandra
Lipsky, Benjamin A
Nixon, Jane
Brown, Sarah
Gray, Janine
author_sort Nelson, E Andrea
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of pathogens, rather than colonising bacteria, is a prerequisite for targeted antibiotic therapy to ensure optimal patient outcome in wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers. Wound swabs are the easiest and most commonly used sampling technique but most published guidelines recommend instead removal of a tissue sample from the wound bed, which is a more complex process. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between culture results from wound swabs and tissue samples in patients with suspected diabetic foot infection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with a diabetic foot ulcer that is thought to be infected are being recruited from 25 sites across England in a cross-sectional study. The coprimary endpoints for the study are agreement between the two sampling techniques for three microbiological parameters: reported presence of likely isolates identified by the UK Health Protection Agency; resistance of isolates to usual antibiotic agents; and, the number of isolates reported per specimen. Secondary endpoints include appropriateness of the empiric antibiotic therapy prescribed and adverse events. Enrolling 400 patients will provide 80% power to detect a difference of 3% in the reported presence of an organism, assuming organism prevalence of 10%, discordance of 5% and a two-sided test at the 5% level of significance. Assumed overall prevalence is based on relatively uncommon organisms such as Pseudomonas. We will define acceptable agreement as κ>0.6. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection (CODIFI) will produce robust data to evaluate the two most commonly used sampling techniques employed for patients with a diabetic foot infection. This will help determine whether or not it is important that clinicians take tissue samples rather than swabs in infected ulcers. This study has been approved by the Sheffield NRES Committee (Ref: 11/YH/0078) and all sites have obtained local approvals prior starting recruitment. STUDY REGISTRATION: NRES Ref: 11/YH/0078, UKCRN ID: 10440, ISRCTN: 52608451
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3549255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35492552013-01-23 Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection Nelson, E Andrea Backhouse, Michael Ross Bhogal, Moninder S Wright-Hughes, Alexandra Lipsky, Benjamin A Nixon, Jane Brown, Sarah Gray, Janine BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of pathogens, rather than colonising bacteria, is a prerequisite for targeted antibiotic therapy to ensure optimal patient outcome in wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers. Wound swabs are the easiest and most commonly used sampling technique but most published guidelines recommend instead removal of a tissue sample from the wound bed, which is a more complex process. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between culture results from wound swabs and tissue samples in patients with suspected diabetic foot infection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with a diabetic foot ulcer that is thought to be infected are being recruited from 25 sites across England in a cross-sectional study. The coprimary endpoints for the study are agreement between the two sampling techniques for three microbiological parameters: reported presence of likely isolates identified by the UK Health Protection Agency; resistance of isolates to usual antibiotic agents; and, the number of isolates reported per specimen. Secondary endpoints include appropriateness of the empiric antibiotic therapy prescribed and adverse events. Enrolling 400 patients will provide 80% power to detect a difference of 3% in the reported presence of an organism, assuming organism prevalence of 10%, discordance of 5% and a two-sided test at the 5% level of significance. Assumed overall prevalence is based on relatively uncommon organisms such as Pseudomonas. We will define acceptable agreement as κ>0.6. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection (CODIFI) will produce robust data to evaluate the two most commonly used sampling techniques employed for patients with a diabetic foot infection. This will help determine whether or not it is important that clinicians take tissue samples rather than swabs in infected ulcers. This study has been approved by the Sheffield NRES Committee (Ref: 11/YH/0078) and all sites have obtained local approvals prior starting recruitment. STUDY REGISTRATION: NRES Ref: 11/YH/0078, UKCRN ID: 10440, ISRCTN: 52608451 BMJ Publishing Group 2013-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3549255/ /pubmed/23293263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002370 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Nelson, E Andrea
Backhouse, Michael Ross
Bhogal, Moninder S
Wright-Hughes, Alexandra
Lipsky, Benjamin A
Nixon, Jane
Brown, Sarah
Gray, Janine
Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection
title Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection
title_full Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection
title_fullStr Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection
title_full_unstemmed Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection
title_short Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection
title_sort concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23293263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002370
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsoneandrea concordanceindiabeticfootulcerinfection
AT backhousemichaelross concordanceindiabeticfootulcerinfection
AT bhogalmoninders concordanceindiabeticfootulcerinfection
AT wrighthughesalexandra concordanceindiabeticfootulcerinfection
AT lipskybenjamina concordanceindiabeticfootulcerinfection
AT nixonjane concordanceindiabeticfootulcerinfection
AT brownsarah concordanceindiabeticfootulcerinfection
AT grayjanine concordanceindiabeticfootulcerinfection