Cargando…

The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: In research with long-term follow-up and repeated measurements, quick and complete response to questionnaires helps ensure a study’s validity, precision and efficiency. Evidence on the effect of non-monetary incentives on response rates in observational longitudinal research is scarce. O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Mark, Lonneke B, van Wonderen, Karina E, Mohrs, Jacob, Bindels, Patrick JE, Puhan, Milo A, ter Riet, Gerben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-186
_version_ 1782256404131741696
author van der Mark, Lonneke B
van Wonderen, Karina E
Mohrs, Jacob
Bindels, Patrick JE
Puhan, Milo A
ter Riet, Gerben
author_facet van der Mark, Lonneke B
van Wonderen, Karina E
Mohrs, Jacob
Bindels, Patrick JE
Puhan, Milo A
ter Riet, Gerben
author_sort van der Mark, Lonneke B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In research with long-term follow-up and repeated measurements, quick and complete response to questionnaires helps ensure a study’s validity, precision and efficiency. Evidence on the effect of non-monetary incentives on response rates in observational longitudinal research is scarce. OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of two strategies to enhance completeness and efficiency in observational cohort studies with follow-up durations of around 2 years. METHOD AND INTERVENTION: In a factorial design, 771 children between 2 and 5 years old and their parents participating in a prospective cohort study were randomized to three intervention groups and a control group. Three types of lotteries were run: (i) daytrip tickets for the whole family to a popular amusement park if they returned all postal questionnaires, (ii) €12.50-worth gift vouchers for sending back the questionnaire on time after each questionnaire round and (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires without any reminder. Secondary outcomes were ‘100% returned with or without reminder’, ‘probability of 100% non-response’, ‘probability of withdrawal’, ‘proportion of returned questionnaires’ and ‘overall number of reminders sent’. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: After testing for interaction between the two lottery interventions, the two trials were analysed separately. We calculated risk differences (RD) and numbers needed to “treat” and their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Daytrip nor voucher intervention had an effect on the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires (RD −0.01; 95% CI-0.07 – 0.06) and (RD 0.02; 95% CI-0.50 – 0.08), respectively. No effects were found on the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the idea that lottery-style incentives lead to more complete response to postal questionnaires in observational cohort studies with repeated data collection and follow-up durations of around 2 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3549293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35492932013-01-23 The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial van der Mark, Lonneke B van Wonderen, Karina E Mohrs, Jacob Bindels, Patrick JE Puhan, Milo A ter Riet, Gerben BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In research with long-term follow-up and repeated measurements, quick and complete response to questionnaires helps ensure a study’s validity, precision and efficiency. Evidence on the effect of non-monetary incentives on response rates in observational longitudinal research is scarce. OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of two strategies to enhance completeness and efficiency in observational cohort studies with follow-up durations of around 2 years. METHOD AND INTERVENTION: In a factorial design, 771 children between 2 and 5 years old and their parents participating in a prospective cohort study were randomized to three intervention groups and a control group. Three types of lotteries were run: (i) daytrip tickets for the whole family to a popular amusement park if they returned all postal questionnaires, (ii) €12.50-worth gift vouchers for sending back the questionnaire on time after each questionnaire round and (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires without any reminder. Secondary outcomes were ‘100% returned with or without reminder’, ‘probability of 100% non-response’, ‘probability of withdrawal’, ‘proportion of returned questionnaires’ and ‘overall number of reminders sent’. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: After testing for interaction between the two lottery interventions, the two trials were analysed separately. We calculated risk differences (RD) and numbers needed to “treat” and their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Daytrip nor voucher intervention had an effect on the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires (RD −0.01; 95% CI-0.07 – 0.06) and (RD 0.02; 95% CI-0.50 – 0.08), respectively. No effects were found on the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the idea that lottery-style incentives lead to more complete response to postal questionnaires in observational cohort studies with repeated data collection and follow-up durations of around 2 years. BioMed Central 2012-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3549293/ /pubmed/23249323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-186 Text en Copyright ©2012 van der Mark et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Mark, Lonneke B
van Wonderen, Karina E
Mohrs, Jacob
Bindels, Patrick JE
Puhan, Milo A
ter Riet, Gerben
The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial
title The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial
title_full The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial
title_fullStr The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial
title_short The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial
title_sort effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-186
work_keys_str_mv AT vandermarklonnekeb theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT vanwonderenkarinae theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT mohrsjacob theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT bindelspatrickje theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT puhanmiloa theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT terrietgerben theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT vandermarklonnekeb effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT vanwonderenkarinae effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT mohrsjacob effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT bindelspatrickje effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT puhanmiloa effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial
AT terrietgerben effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial