Cargando…
The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial
BACKGROUND: In research with long-term follow-up and repeated measurements, quick and complete response to questionnaires helps ensure a study’s validity, precision and efficiency. Evidence on the effect of non-monetary incentives on response rates in observational longitudinal research is scarce. O...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-186 |
_version_ | 1782256404131741696 |
---|---|
author | van der Mark, Lonneke B van Wonderen, Karina E Mohrs, Jacob Bindels, Patrick JE Puhan, Milo A ter Riet, Gerben |
author_facet | van der Mark, Lonneke B van Wonderen, Karina E Mohrs, Jacob Bindels, Patrick JE Puhan, Milo A ter Riet, Gerben |
author_sort | van der Mark, Lonneke B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In research with long-term follow-up and repeated measurements, quick and complete response to questionnaires helps ensure a study’s validity, precision and efficiency. Evidence on the effect of non-monetary incentives on response rates in observational longitudinal research is scarce. OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of two strategies to enhance completeness and efficiency in observational cohort studies with follow-up durations of around 2 years. METHOD AND INTERVENTION: In a factorial design, 771 children between 2 and 5 years old and their parents participating in a prospective cohort study were randomized to three intervention groups and a control group. Three types of lotteries were run: (i) daytrip tickets for the whole family to a popular amusement park if they returned all postal questionnaires, (ii) €12.50-worth gift vouchers for sending back the questionnaire on time after each questionnaire round and (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires without any reminder. Secondary outcomes were ‘100% returned with or without reminder’, ‘probability of 100% non-response’, ‘probability of withdrawal’, ‘proportion of returned questionnaires’ and ‘overall number of reminders sent’. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: After testing for interaction between the two lottery interventions, the two trials were analysed separately. We calculated risk differences (RD) and numbers needed to “treat” and their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Daytrip nor voucher intervention had an effect on the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires (RD −0.01; 95% CI-0.07 – 0.06) and (RD 0.02; 95% CI-0.50 – 0.08), respectively. No effects were found on the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the idea that lottery-style incentives lead to more complete response to postal questionnaires in observational cohort studies with repeated data collection and follow-up durations of around 2 years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3549293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35492932013-01-23 The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial van der Mark, Lonneke B van Wonderen, Karina E Mohrs, Jacob Bindels, Patrick JE Puhan, Milo A ter Riet, Gerben BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In research with long-term follow-up and repeated measurements, quick and complete response to questionnaires helps ensure a study’s validity, precision and efficiency. Evidence on the effect of non-monetary incentives on response rates in observational longitudinal research is scarce. OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of two strategies to enhance completeness and efficiency in observational cohort studies with follow-up durations of around 2 years. METHOD AND INTERVENTION: In a factorial design, 771 children between 2 and 5 years old and their parents participating in a prospective cohort study were randomized to three intervention groups and a control group. Three types of lotteries were run: (i) daytrip tickets for the whole family to a popular amusement park if they returned all postal questionnaires, (ii) €12.50-worth gift vouchers for sending back the questionnaire on time after each questionnaire round and (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires without any reminder. Secondary outcomes were ‘100% returned with or without reminder’, ‘probability of 100% non-response’, ‘probability of withdrawal’, ‘proportion of returned questionnaires’ and ‘overall number of reminders sent’. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: After testing for interaction between the two lottery interventions, the two trials were analysed separately. We calculated risk differences (RD) and numbers needed to “treat” and their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Daytrip nor voucher intervention had an effect on the proportion of participants who returned all questionnaires (RD −0.01; 95% CI-0.07 – 0.06) and (RD 0.02; 95% CI-0.50 – 0.08), respectively. No effects were found on the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the idea that lottery-style incentives lead to more complete response to postal questionnaires in observational cohort studies with repeated data collection and follow-up durations of around 2 years. BioMed Central 2012-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3549293/ /pubmed/23249323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-186 Text en Copyright ©2012 van der Mark et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Mark, Lonneke B van Wonderen, Karina E Mohrs, Jacob Bindels, Patrick JE Puhan, Milo A ter Riet, Gerben The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial |
title | The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial |
title_full | The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial |
title_fullStr | The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial |
title_short | The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial |
title_sort | effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandermarklonnekeb theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT vanwonderenkarinae theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT mohrsjacob theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT bindelspatrickje theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT puhanmiloa theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT terrietgerben theeffectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT vandermarklonnekeb effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT vanwonderenkarinae effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT mohrsjacob effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT bindelspatrickje effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT puhanmiloa effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial AT terrietgerben effectoftwolotterystyleincentivesonresponseratestopostalquestionnairesinaprospectivecohortstudyinpreschoolchildrenathighriskofasthmaarandomizedtrial |