Cargando…
Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR enteroclysis and to compare it to video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in the analysis of suspected small-bowel disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 77 patients who underwent both MR enteroclysis and VCE and compared the findings of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22527155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9892-4 |
_version_ | 1782256418434318336 |
---|---|
author | Van Weyenberg, Stijn J. B. Bouman, Koen Jacobs, Maarten A. J. M. Halloran, Brendan P. Van der Peet, Donald L. Mulder, Chris J. J. Van Kuijk, Cornelis Van Waesberghe, Jan Hein T. M. |
author_facet | Van Weyenberg, Stijn J. B. Bouman, Koen Jacobs, Maarten A. J. M. Halloran, Brendan P. Van der Peet, Donald L. Mulder, Chris J. J. Van Kuijk, Cornelis Van Waesberghe, Jan Hein T. M. |
author_sort | Van Weyenberg, Stijn J. B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR enteroclysis and to compare it to video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in the analysis of suspected small-bowel disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 77 patients who underwent both MR enteroclysis and VCE and compared the findings of these studies with the findings of enteroscopy, surgery, or with the results of clinical follow-up lasting ≥2 years. RESULTS: Findings included malignant neoplasms (n = 13), benign neoplasms (n = 10), refractory celiac disease (n = 4), Crohn’s disease (n = 2) and miscellaneous conditions (n = 10). Specificity of MR enteroclysis was higher than that of VCE (0.97 vs. 0.84, P = 0.047), whereas sensitivity was similar (0.79 vs. 0.74, P = 0.591). In 2/32 (6.3%) patients with both negative VCE and negative MR enteroclysis a positive diagnosis was established, compared to 5/11 (45.5%) patients in whom VCE was positive and MR enteroclysis was negative (likelihood ratio 8.1; P = 0.004), 9/11 (81.8%) patients in whom MR enteroclysis was positive and VCE was negative (likelihood ratio 23.5; P < 0.0001), and all 23 patients in whom both VCE and MR enteroclysis showed abnormalities (likelihood ratio 60.8; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: VCE and MR enteroclysis are complementary modalities. In our study-population, MR enteroclysis was more specific than VCE, while both produced the same sensitivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3549405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35494052013-01-23 Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease Van Weyenberg, Stijn J. B. Bouman, Koen Jacobs, Maarten A. J. M. Halloran, Brendan P. Van der Peet, Donald L. Mulder, Chris J. J. Van Kuijk, Cornelis Van Waesberghe, Jan Hein T. M. Abdom Imaging Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR enteroclysis and to compare it to video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in the analysis of suspected small-bowel disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 77 patients who underwent both MR enteroclysis and VCE and compared the findings of these studies with the findings of enteroscopy, surgery, or with the results of clinical follow-up lasting ≥2 years. RESULTS: Findings included malignant neoplasms (n = 13), benign neoplasms (n = 10), refractory celiac disease (n = 4), Crohn’s disease (n = 2) and miscellaneous conditions (n = 10). Specificity of MR enteroclysis was higher than that of VCE (0.97 vs. 0.84, P = 0.047), whereas sensitivity was similar (0.79 vs. 0.74, P = 0.591). In 2/32 (6.3%) patients with both negative VCE and negative MR enteroclysis a positive diagnosis was established, compared to 5/11 (45.5%) patients in whom VCE was positive and MR enteroclysis was negative (likelihood ratio 8.1; P = 0.004), 9/11 (81.8%) patients in whom MR enteroclysis was positive and VCE was negative (likelihood ratio 23.5; P < 0.0001), and all 23 patients in whom both VCE and MR enteroclysis showed abnormalities (likelihood ratio 60.8; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: VCE and MR enteroclysis are complementary modalities. In our study-population, MR enteroclysis was more specific than VCE, while both produced the same sensitivity. Springer-Verlag 2012-04-18 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3549405/ /pubmed/22527155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9892-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Van Weyenberg, Stijn J. B. Bouman, Koen Jacobs, Maarten A. J. M. Halloran, Brendan P. Van der Peet, Donald L. Mulder, Chris J. J. Van Kuijk, Cornelis Van Waesberghe, Jan Hein T. M. Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease |
title | Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease |
title_full | Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease |
title_fullStr | Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease |
title_short | Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease |
title_sort | comparison of mr enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22527155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9892-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanweyenbergstijnjb comparisonofmrenteroclysiswithvideocapsuleendoscopyintheinvestigationofsmallintestinaldisease AT boumankoen comparisonofmrenteroclysiswithvideocapsuleendoscopyintheinvestigationofsmallintestinaldisease AT jacobsmaartenajm comparisonofmrenteroclysiswithvideocapsuleendoscopyintheinvestigationofsmallintestinaldisease AT halloranbrendanp comparisonofmrenteroclysiswithvideocapsuleendoscopyintheinvestigationofsmallintestinaldisease AT vanderpeetdonaldl comparisonofmrenteroclysiswithvideocapsuleendoscopyintheinvestigationofsmallintestinaldisease AT mulderchrisjj comparisonofmrenteroclysiswithvideocapsuleendoscopyintheinvestigationofsmallintestinaldisease AT vankuijkcornelis comparisonofmrenteroclysiswithvideocapsuleendoscopyintheinvestigationofsmallintestinaldisease AT vanwaesberghejanheintm comparisonofmrenteroclysiswithvideocapsuleendoscopyintheinvestigationofsmallintestinaldisease |