Cargando…

Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for locally advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NST) in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Four hundred and nine patients were identified between January 1999 and December 2011. All p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angelucci, Domenico, Tinari, Nicola, Grassadonia, Antonino, Cianchetti, Ettore, Ausili-Cefaro, Giampiero, Iezzi, Laura, Zilli, Marinella, Grossi, Simona, Ursini, Lucia Anna, Scognamiglio, Maria Teresa, Castrilli, Graziella, De Tursi, Michele, Noccioli, Paolo, Cioffi, Pasquale, Iacobelli, Stefano, Natoli, Clara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23052698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1325-9
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NST) in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Four hundred and nine patients were identified between January 1999 and December 2011. All patients received NST followed by surgery, adjuvant treatments and radiotherapy, as appropriate. RESULTS: At Kaplan–Meier analysis, patients with surgical stage III disease were more likely to develop distant metastasis and die from breast cancer (p < 0.001). Luminal A and luminal B/HER2-negative patients had better prognosis; moreover, patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors had a significantly longer DRFS (p < 0.0049) and OS (p < 0.0001) compared with patients with HR-negative tumors as well as patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (DRFS and OS: p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, HR negativity (p < 0.001 for both DRFS and OS), mastectomy (DRFS: p = 0.009; OS: p = 0.05) and stage III disease (DRFS: p < 0.001; OS: p = 0.003) were associated with shorter DRFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: HR negativity, mastectomy and pathological stage III disease are the variables independently associated with a worse outcome in our cohort of patients. These data are of high interest since they derive from a very heterogeneous group of patients, treated with different neoadjuvant/adjuvant regimens outside of clinical trials and with a long follow-up period.